1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Two-year extension for Jaylen Warren

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Steelersfan43, Sep 1, 2025 at 10:59 AM.

  1. forgotten1

    forgotten1 Well-Known Member

    8,932
    2,323
    Mar 4, 2022
    Sure if Jaylen gets the yips
    Tomlins patience be Warren thin.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. Chucktownsteeler

    Chucktownsteeler Well-Known Member

    260
    111
    Dec 9, 2022
    Didn't Najee sign a 1 year deal with the Bolts?
     
  3. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    25,863
    4,259
    Dec 18, 2016
    The ongoing discussion of the two backs was dragged into this thread. I did not do the dragging, but I'm certainly not going to stop supporting my side of it here. The Steelers went with the lesser back because he is cheaper, younger, and has less mileage on him. I'm sure Harris being vocal about wanting running backs to get paid was a factor, too.

    If the question is only who do they think is the better back, the answer was made clear on the field when they played Harris more and gave him the ball more.
     
  4. Chucktownsteeler

    Chucktownsteeler Well-Known Member

    260
    111
    Dec 9, 2022
    Tomlin has very little tolerance for turn overs.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. jeh1856

    jeh1856 Im a happy camper

    34,434
    12,242
    Oct 26, 2011
    Doesn’t seem debatable

    But I’m guessing it will be
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. jeh1856

    jeh1856 Im a happy camper

    34,434
    12,242
    Oct 26, 2011
    Apparently not
     
  7. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,904
    10,343
    Oct 16, 2011
    You’re contradicting yourself a bit here. You argued that they would have played Warren over Harris if they felt he was better which completely disregards the draft capital and the benching of a first rd pick for a UDFA, I believe you said they would be idiots for letting that influence them.

    Yet here you are saying they chose the player they felt is worse just to save about a million dollars. That wouldnt be idiotic? Especially when they had more cap space than they have in years?

    However, in light of the extension, the whole cheaper RB narrative isn’t even true anymore, they are actually paying Warren more than if they had just picked up Harris option and kept him.

    Clearly they both like and think Warren is the better RB.
     
  8. jeh1856

    jeh1856 Im a happy camper

    34,434
    12,242
    Oct 26, 2011
    Just because you liked your ex wife to marry her doesn’t mean she is your favorite now

    Warren is the favorite now

    See isn’t that simple

    And the money comment is pure foolishness :facepalm:
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  9. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,904
    10,343
    Oct 16, 2011
    When a person spends an entire year making an argument only to see that argument go up in smoke, it can be hard to let go.

    upload_2025-9-3_12-26-5.gif
     
  10. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    25,863
    4,259
    Dec 18, 2016
    I am not contradicting myself at all. I am not saying they chose the lesser back only to save about $1 million. I stated four reasons why they chose to hang on to Warren while letting Harris go. I don't know why you chose to leave three of them out. Warren is younger. He has less mileage on his body. He has not been vocal about teams needing to pay running backs like Harris. You chose to ignore those reasons, so your post does not accurately reflect my argument.

    Your claim regarding money is also dubious. Harris would have only been under team control for one year with a $7 million commitment. Warren will make slightly more this season, but the team has him locked up for three seasons while only being committed to paying him $12 million. They got Warren longer for less average guaranteed money per season.

    So no, it is not clear at all that they think Warren is better. They think he is younger, with less mileage, and not vocal in a way they don't like. If you look at guaranteed money per season and years of control, you could argue that Warren is still cheaper, too.

    This all ignores the very good chance that Warren will not play the same role as Harris, at least not in the long term. He could continue to play the same role has for the team if Kaleb Johnson can be what they hope he is. Warren still needs to show he can stay healthy and protect the ball while getting more touches.
     
  11. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    38,854
    10,163
    Dec 23, 2020
    Actually they (I believe) accounted for fumbles lost, not actually the fumbles.
    Again I will not talk bad, he is our running back, and Najee isn't. Nuff said.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!