1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Pass Interference now a 15yd penalty ??

Discussion in 'General NFL Talk' started by turtle, Feb 25, 2015.

  1. turtle

    turtle

    8,542
    1,375
    Jan 14, 2015
    When it comes to drawing pass interference penalties, Baltimore's Joe Flacco is elite.
    Since Flacco came into the league in 2008, his passes have led to 78 accepted defensive pass interference penalties, by far the most in the league (Eli Manning is second with 65). That's a flag for pass interference on one of every 57 throws, including the playoffs.
    The concept is celebrated in Baltimore.
    [​IMG]
    Perhaps it should be. The Ravens scored 56 points from drives that had a defensive pass interference penalty accepted. That's an extra field goal a game.
    Of the 15 successful Heave 'n Prays attempted by Flacco this season, drives on which the flag flew resulted in a punt just one time.
    That may be hindered a bit in the future.
    The NFL is reportedly discussing making defensive pass interference a 15-yard penalty, not giving the offense the ball at the spot of the foul. An automatic first down comes with it, but it won't likely change the patterned philosophy of chucking it short to a deep receiver and making him come back to the ball.
    It's a 15-yard penalty from the previous spot in college.
    It's one of multiple options regarding the use of instant replay as well as the issue of pass interference that was presented to the league's competition committee, on which sits Steelers coach Mike Tomlin and Ravens coach John Harbaugh.
    Ravens pending free agent Torrey Smith was on the receiving end of a whopping 12 of those 15 accepted interference penalties. Perhaps not coincidentally, Ravens owner Steve Bisciotti said Tuesday, "I think we're going to have to take it on the chin and move on," in regards to Smith's contract situation.
    One might interpret that as a negotiation tactic, sending a message to the league's most prolific receiver in terms of drawing pass interference (Smith had 767 receiving yards on 49 catches, and his 12 pass interference penalties drawn resulted in 261 additional yards). Perhaps it speaks to the league discussing changing the current rules, to diminish the hugely slanted penalty a little bit.
    Certainly, Baltimore can find another fairly one-dimensional receiver to be on the receiving end of the 10-plus pass interference penalties Flacco has drawn per year over his career. But the rule itself changing may cause aggressive downfield passing teams like the Ravens to re-think their strategy.
    Or at the least, it may simply give them less of a reward for doing it.

    http://www.behindthesteelcurtain.co...ibility-of-making-pass-interference-a-15-yard

    I've been clamoring this for awhile as I'm sure everyone else has too. Nice to see its under discussion and could become a reality.
     
  2. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    When I saw this the other day I thought the rats would probably seriously lobby to keep this from happening. I hate them. There are no real words for me to describe how much I despise everything that team stands for.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  3. thesteeldeal

    thesteeldeal Well-Known Member

    13,841
    1,898
    Oct 18, 2011
    I hope my prayers are finally answered ,would be the best rule change in ages.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  4. turtle

    turtle

    8,542
    1,375
    Jan 14, 2015
    Is this up for discussion by the league owners this year again?? still hate the current rule
     
  5. Guest

    Guest Guest

    Well, it's not like Mike Wallace is going to jump to try and catch those moonballs anyway. :lolol:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. MorrisFoster

    MorrisFoster Well-Known Member

    1,209
    108
    Feb 8, 2014
    15 yards is much more fair rather than assuming a receiver would one hand catch a 50 yard bomb every time.
     
  7. Dean

    Dean Well-Known Member

    1,166
    51
    Mar 1, 2016
    ditto.
     
  8. SteelinOhio

    SteelinOhio

    5,832
    1,542
    Oct 16, 2011
    I am 100% in favor of this happening.
     
  9. turtle

    turtle

    8,542
    1,375
    Jan 14, 2015
    I just saw the 7 rules that were passed. Changing the pass interference penalty was not one of them unfortunately. Not sure when the competition committee meets, but maybe there's some discussion there.

    edit: I guess the committee is meeting now, as they just passed 2 more rules - automatic ejection after 2 personal fouls and touchbacks at the 25
     
  10. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,576
    10,167
    Oct 16, 2011
    I think you'll just see DB's mug the receivers much more if they make it only 15 yards.

    I'd rather see them just use instant replay to determine if it was PI or not. Too hard to call that penalty full speed.
     
  11. turtle

    turtle

    8,542
    1,375
    Jan 14, 2015
    good point
     
  12. SteelersWorld

    SteelersWorld Well-Known Member

    142
    14
    Oct 20, 2011
    I am 100% for this as well. There's no way pass interference penalties should be for more yards than personal foul penalties.
     
  13. Lizard72

    Lizard72

    21,866
    1,844
    Oct 23, 2011
    Yeah, maybe go ahead and make it a judgement call again?

    I mean, the throw it short and come back to the ball pray for PI or maybe you actually catch it crap pisses me off. Especially when it seems your team can't get the benefit of an actual PI where the defender is holding the receivers' arms as they attempt to catch the ball in a play-off game on National TV.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!