For you Aaron Rodgers haters....

No of course not, there are no professional opinions. They are not professionals.

 

I do not see it like that. The brass was all in on Rodgers even though Rodgers was not signed. They had Rudolph signed. The plan was already in to improve the rest of the team. Khan took when it fit him.

 

So what's the problem?? I maybe don't understand, and You aren't complaining, if so , my bad , and I apologize.
We are in a good position this year with Rodgers, and Mason. Let's worry about next year, next year.

 

I see it as being in a good position with the QB room. Mike decides who plays because he sets the course for Super Bowl run. He can choose Rodgers, I am fine with whoever he chooses.
From a GM position, Khan provided him excellent options for this year and beyond. If I was the GM, I would not do that. I would not give him the Rodgers option. That is because we are not the Packers, we are not grooming young quarterbacks behind a veteran. Eventually we will have to play a young quarterback for that first year. I would always do that first rather than sign Rodgers.

 

Yes, that is another way to look at it. I do not trust it though because we do not execute these transitions like that.
Also, another way to look at it is as you said, they do not view Howard as heir apparent and will draft a QB when that time comes. I do not agree with that.

 

Check out the throw from Rodgers to Heyward.

Not bad for a very old guy moving to his right throwing across his body to his left while in the air using all arm!

https://x.com/KTSmithFFSN/status/1977450856246071570

 

3 Days

 

Well this is today’s nonsensical post

 

We saw shadows of the morning light, shadows of the evening sun
'Til the shadows and the lights were one
Shadows of the morning light, shadows of the evening sun
'Til the shadows and the lights were one, oh

 

Mad respect;