1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Does the NFL really care about helmet to helmet contact

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by bettissb40, Jan 28, 2016.

  1. bettissb40

    bettissb40 Well-Known Member

    688
    35
    Oct 16, 2011
    I really wonder about that. And it is because of what happen to our team this year from one guy. He gets fined the first time and then goes out and does the same thing again. Now remember we have to play against the Bungles again next year will this happen again. I think the NFL needs to set a rule: 1st time, $30,000 fine, 2nd time 50,000 and you are out of the NFL. I know there are a lot of politics in involved in the NFL but that should be set aside under these conditions.
     
  2. bigsteelerfaninky

    bigsteelerfaninky Well-Known Member

    7,235
    366
    Oct 24, 2011
    No they don't
    They just don't want to get sued anymore
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
  3. steelgirl84

    steelgirl84 Well-Known Member

    517
    63
    Sep 28, 2014
    I don't think they career either, but they have to make it seem like they do.
    I think it should depend on the hit. For the 1st offense, it wasn't intentional, the fine should be like $40,000. But if it was intentional, it should be like $60,000-$80,000. I know that's steep but these guys make enough. The 2nd offense: Unintentional- $60,000, suspended 1 game. Intentional- $110,000, suspended 3 games. The 3rd offense: intentional or unintentional- suspended indefinitely.

    They should take it more seriously- but it's not.
     
  4. Clive From PIT

    Clive From PIT I'm starting to drink the Koolaid! Site Admin

    3,146
    975
    Dec 14, 2015
    Rather than an arbitrary amount, why not set the fine at "an amount equal to one game's pay"? (Or whatever multiple you desire.) At least then a fine would actually be meaningful to the highly-compensated players, instead of a fly landing on a rhino's back.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Diamond

    Diamond Well-Known Member

    5,790
    469
    May 26, 2012
    I think they should adopt the college targeting rule, revue the play after the hit and determine if the defender targeted the offended player and if so toss him out of the game and make him sit out the first half of the next game, adopt that rule change and add a fine to the punishment as well.........
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Cali Steel

    Cali Steel

    1,003
    66
    Jan 4, 2012
    I dont think the nfl cares at all about helmet to helmet contact. They dont like bad PR.
    I cant stand the new rules and how they are applied unfairly. Best way to handle this is improved helmets. Its pretty simple physics...time vs change of velocity. Speed dosent kill, its the sudden lack there of that causes problems.
    There has to be a way to slow down the sudden changes in brain velocity
     
  7. Cali Steel

    Cali Steel

    1,003
    66
    Jan 4, 2012
    You could make football fields 12 inches of mud or foam that slows these super atheletes down. Would be pretty fun to watch.
     
  8. Jammasterc

    Jammasterc Well-Known Member

    15,715
    1,363
    Oct 26, 2011
    If they did, running backs would not be allowed to get hit in head or dish it out. That happens more than anything.
     
  9. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    12,014
    2,986
    Nov 5, 2011
    Goodell and his henchmen only care about one thing. Guess? They are only driven to show they care by the public outcry. Any person in reality and not a lemming knows this is total BS. The money train is a plenty. They will continue to dupe the public. It's a violent game but the head hunting does have to stop. They could have made a colossal step by suspending Berfict for the year. He got 3 games and the talking heads say he will appeal and it will be reduced. Yep, they care. Oh, and let's not leave out the owners either.
     
  10. Griswald

    Griswald Well-Known Member

    472
    41
    Oct 21, 2014
    If they really cared, they would make any contact with the helmet off limits. This NEEDS to include offensive players. Why can a runner grab and twist a face mask as hard as they want to, but a defensive player Can't?
     
  11. GoalLine

    GoalLine

    2,542
    987
    Oct 16, 2011
    They care only when $ is involved on both sides. They don't like to pay out for the settlement(s) but like to market the big hits as well.
     
  12. GoalLine

    GoalLine

    2,542
    987
    Oct 16, 2011
    Very much agree. I've seen them call it before against the O but rarely. I've never cared much for the stiff arms to the face.
     
  13. Lizard72

    Lizard72

    21,867
    1,845
    Oct 23, 2011
    Well, I'm looking at it and it looks like there was a decline in reported concussions for a couple years.

    Possibly the increase can be attributed to having an independent observer present and the increased awareness among the organizations and players in general.

    I really don't think as an entity they have the genuine care for the players health in mind other than how to protect the integrity and the bottom line at the same time. I do believe there are individuals in the organization(s) that have player safety very much in the forefront.

    I relate it to the military where there's a perception that there's more sexual assault than in the general public because we're bombarded by PSA's and have an actual avenue for reporting and action being taken. Naturally you're going to look at hard numbers and say it's worse, but in reality there's more likely to be action taken based on a system being in place to handle it.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!