Some folks just hate him for having worn the wrong uniform in college. You can't reason with them. Edit: It is laughable that anyone could...
That isn't really true, either, but some folks hae been fooled by Rudolph getting to play without Canada against three easy opponents. At least...
No, he wasn't going to start there, but he had an opportunity to show what he could do in a competent offense, but the injury short-circuited that.
Of course, he does, but I think that was a terrible offensive design for a rookie, and even worse for his second season. They refused to trust...
It is a fair question despite the foolishness coming from the Penn State fan who hates Pickett for having gone to Pitt. Pickett reacted angrily...
I doubt Cobert buys into what he is saying either, but I'm not as charitable in my reasoning. He is defending his own legacy, which includes many...
Actually, you did try to dismiss everything but touchdowns and Super Bowl performances. Now that you are losing the argument, you are backing away...
Nobody. He's adding a strawman argument to his other logical fallacies.
See, there is another problem. You are misrepresenting my parameters to try to sell your flawed argument. I care about it all. You are the one...
You mean how success rate is subjective, and yards per carry is objective? :drinks:
Yes. I look at everything. That is what makes my argument so much better than yours.
That is also an excellent point. This is what happens when you focus too heavily on one or two factors instead of looking at the whole picture....
Availability is the closest you get to a valid argument. My parameters are looking at everything. Yours are to focus on just one or two things...
The difference is I look at everything while you try to narrow it to only one or two categories. My approach is valid, and yours is not. You are...
And you need these false implied premises to push your argument. You try to narrow things down to parameters that make your guy better, but the...
Maybe people actually understand and still think you overrate a statistic that isn't as much in the back's control as yards per carry. Oh wait....
I just get wound up about player safety stuff like that...and perhaps, on occasion, some other matters. :drinks:
Let's look at what Parker did to help the Steelers get to that Super Bowl. Wild Card game vs. the Bengals: 16 carries for 38 yards (2.7 per rush)...
That one-play sample size really means something to you, huh? I guess you forgot that Bell is the one who holds the Steelers' record for rushing...
It wasn't close. Parker wasn't much of a factor in the passing game. Bell was a great receiver and blocker.
