I did, so there! I'm very clairvoyant in those regards and had you all listend to me, you wouldn't be suprised at the outcome of this season.
Yeah, looking at the video, that's exactly what I saw. Looked like the back judge went in to tell them they were not allowed to be set on top of...
Apparently the NFL can determine what would have happened as well as intent. Which is why Tomlin was fined $100k and the Steelers face the loss...
Mute point. Because then it would have been a scoring play and possession would have been established. All scoring plays are reviewed, so of...
Shocker, it's even worse on the Facebook page. I can guarantee that it would be insanity if the Steelers had lost after that call on the FG!
What's funny is that it's the opposite over in Packers Land. Apparently, they were really screwed by the refs on the last play......Guess they...
Wow, mailed it in didn't they?
I don't think you do that and expect the next play to get it in. You could take 2 knees and kick the FG, but you're still giving it back with...
Wow, got lucky there! Why they kept saying the block on Gay was good is beyond me! He grabbed him and spun him out of his angle.
wow........
Season on the line, deep in FG territory and you're still running single back sets......
Wheaton is not a blocker yet. That's why Sanders is a big loss.
Wow, holding his jersey all the way across in front of the ref and no flag.....
First thing I said, Clearly resulted in him getting that catch.
Wow, had to think about that holding call!
Yup because after that everything else is moot!
AHHHH! HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! YES!!!!
So basically they called it a non-possession through the entire play ensuring that there wouldn't be any kind of replay, since he couldn't...
Calm down....almost blew a TV on that one....
Someone make a play! Get that ball!
