True for the rams....Seattle and Philly deserve to be mentionned too
I think Austin is a very good position coach....He is just a terrible DC
This is 2 complete different thing....
This is about the report card by the NFLPA.....
Why answer a question you already know the answer? But not because it's never happened before means it will never happen. The NFL has first...
Why this is so important for you?
For most people, not having a losing season doesn't matter much, and the opinion on Tomlin would have been the same if he'd had a losing season in...
Because he never had the opportunity... But reviving Goff's career after a historic bad rookie season is a great accomplishment... He doesn't need...
:shrug:
don't matter,rookie or not
C'mon,what a joke...You think Gailey had been fired after 1999 by Jerry Jones because he had a losing season 11 years...
Your point make no sense.And the job Sean McVay has done since he joined the Rams speaks for itself... The rest, like your criteria for fitting...
Stupid criteria again but just in the same year,Chan Gailey Those who want to win and compete for a title don't care about the non losing thing...
The rookie thing is such meaningless criteria especially he's never had a rookie QB, so that criteria makes no sense.
Pete Carroll in New England
It don't matter since McVay has proved he could coach a very young QB who had a historic bad rookie season under Jeff Fisher and he has been in...
Just look at the Bills head coach....7 winning season in a row,7 playoffs apparence in a row,6 season in a row with a playoffs win but he has been...
Khan is awful in free agency...He sign way too many old players.It was not the case under Colbert
The current eagles head coach is on the hot seat for the next season........
I don't understand why it's so important to you that he's a rookie in McVay's case? Because this is not
