Thanks for totally missing the point.
Short answer is no.
It may be B.S. to you, but there sure are a lot of people mad about it. Remember how mad you were when the Steelers signed Vick ( I was too) ?...
I don't think those rights apply here of the NFL.
The fact that they were even in the tunnel is disrespectful. You're not going to change people's minds. I don't care if they were sitting ,...
Nothing worse than some schmuck telling me how I'm supposed to feel. If you don't want to be mad about it then don't. That's your choice and I'm...
I support you 100%
Once is one time too many!
Fair enough.
Ok that's fine. Then what's the pre 2009 talk about?
Then why the need to have a team meeting to decide to stay in the tunnel? That's my issue.
I've heard this 2009 argument a few times and it a pretty silly one. It's irrelevant. It's a rule now.
Those people didn't all get together and have a meeting and decided to skip it. They didn't conspire to purposely break protocol.
For a guy who doesn't care you sure are posting a lot about it and stirring the pot. I call B.S. on that.
If your point is that if AV would have stayed in the tunnel that nobody would be complaining, you're wrong.
Not some perspective, his perspective.
You keep posting these tweets. But they don't support what you're suggesting.
I said it before I'll say it again. Doesn't matter to me whether AV was inside or outside the tunnel. I didn't like the situation.
Who is disputing any of that?
