In the last game an extra ten yards would have meant Rudolph getting sacked but not for a safety. Anything that can help the offense needs to be...
It is great to see him stepping up and becoming a receiving threat. He has already established himself as a very willing and capable blocker.
Yeah, I get where you are coming from but I think with our offense really struggling we can't continue to give them terrible starting position...
So your 'defense' of Switzer is that other guys have also sucked and none of us could do better. Ok then.
That return was brutally bad. He started doing the right thing and would have at least gotten to the 10 but then suddenly decided he was a...
I don't care how ugly they are. 4 straight wins with all the injuries plus the inexperience on offense is impressive. Say what you want about...
The rest of the offense needs to up their game and help Mason out.
Rudolph is definitely not at the top of the list of problems with the offense today. Everyone on offense needs to step it up.
I agree. Given how loose with the ball the rest of the offense is, Rudolph deserves praise for at least not costing us games. In his interview...
I think Rudolph has been fine given the overall situation he finds himself in but I would trade him in a heartbeat for Mahomes. Even that doesn't...
Yeah, but they did have a long of 8! Lol. Mason is getting very little help. That he hasn't been tragically bad is encouraging to me.
Their defense doesn't approach average over those years because it has been above average, not below. In 2005 they were the 17th ranked scoring...
And Minkah is a stud. It is so refreshing to once again have a safety that opposing QBs worry about. I think he has helped the CBs play more...
I seem to remember Troy covering T.O. when he was with the Eagles.
I feel like I am watching a different game from a lot of people. No running game. Everybody on offense tried to turn it over. Inopportune...
We weren't a good run blocking team when Munchak was here. LB covered up a lot of run blocking warts.
I guess you aren't going to attempt to explain how "if not for the Rooney Rule, he wouldn't have sniffed the position" is not implying he wouldn't...
I didn't say you said they hired him because of the rule (I did say you implied it, because you did). The quote you used from me made that clear....
I never claimed you said hire (although you did originally say "if not for the Rooney Rule, he wouldn't have sniffed the position", which...
