1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Rumors of Kyler Murray to Steelers?

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Steelpens65, Nov 10, 2023.

  1. AskQuestionsLater

    AskQuestionsLater Writing Team

    23,814
    5,981
    Apr 21, 2016
    Kyler Murray alone isn't solving the Steelers Offensive Woes. Kenny Pickett, even with his regression, isn't the main contributing explanation either. Issue stems from an overall lack of cohesion overall; Matt Canada being the tip of the spear.


    There is enough evidence to seriously question whether or not Kenny is the guy moving forward. There isn't enough evidence to conclude that the Steelers need to "Kick Out Kenny" like so many want. Getting rid of Canada first is but a lengthy list of Off Season Objectives for the 2024 Steelers.


    Finding out if Kenny really is or isn't it will be the focus in 2024. As for 2023?! Hell, finishing on a high note needs to be the entire Offenses top priority.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Steelrules

    Steelrules Well-Known Member

    2,201
    676
    May 12, 2013
    If both Murray and Canada are somehow with the team next year then there will be two people who refuses to watch game film
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 3
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    32,981
    8,045
    Nov 14, 2011
    Remember the rumor the Steelers were the favorite to trade for Chase Young :facepalm:, Arizona overpaid for Murray, no thanks.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. BigBensBigBong

    BigBensBigBong Well-Known Member

    6,338
    960
    Dec 14, 2014
    We should get a QB who can run really fast, LOL.

    Actually, maybe not a bad idea. Bring that guy in for trick run plays sometimes.
     
  5. Arch Stanton

    Arch Stanton Well-Known Member

    1,760
    335
    Oct 10, 2022
    The last thing we need is a midget QB that's always hurt
     
  6. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,849
    4,933
    Nov 4, 2011
    Just for kicks I tried to figure out the contract numbers if Arizona trades him in the offseason (pre June 1). This is all based on my back of the envelope calculations, and assumes that an option bonus paid in March is treated like any other signing bonus and remains on Arizona’s cap (I’m 95% sure that’s the case).

    1. Arizona would take a dead cap hit of $46 million, which actually saves them $5 million vs. the 2024 cap.

    2. His new team would have the following dollars as a combination of salary and various bonuses:
    2024 $38.85 million
    2025 $32.6 million
    2026 $43 million
    2027 $36.335 million
    2028 $46.35 million

    I can see why there’s speculation. If Arizona wants to move on, they can trade him and push $35 million in guaranteed salary to his new team. If there’s a team out there that loves the 2020 & 2021 version of Murray, the cap numbers aren’t terrible for a “franchise” QB (if the acquiring team thinks that’s what he is). There’s flexibility in his deal to restructure to manage the cap hits. From what I can tell, his salary for 2024 is mostly guaranteed, but then the team is exercising a year by year option with little dead cap hit (unless they create the dead cap by restructuring). 2024 basically becomes a “let’s see if this works out” kind of year with minimal cap implications beyond 2024.

    Of course, there’s a risk that he seeks to have his deal redone to eliminate much of that year by year optionality.
     
    • Informative Informative x 3
  7. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    15,610
    2,465
    Oct 26, 2011
    What a joke, you guys believe these writers?
     
  8. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    15,610
    2,465
    Oct 26, 2011
    Or know what their watching.
     
  9. Karl

    Karl Well-Known Member

    2,280
    1,476
    Jan 19, 2022
    Kyler Murray.
    I have no idea what Arizona was thinking. The troll joins the group of dubious honor - worst 1st draft picks.
    I despise Murray. He was good in a college system and that's all.

    The thought of Canada and Murray in the same system.... wait.... my mind just smoked.
    It would be awful
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  10. mikeyg

    mikeyg Well-Known Member

    5,686
    1,224
    Dec 23, 2020

    that would continue the lost decade.....
     
  11. mikeyg

    mikeyg Well-Known Member

    5,686
    1,224
    Dec 23, 2020

    maybe - but we can do better than them all, we have failed miserably for YEARS at backup QB
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. Vox Ferrum

    Vox Ferrum Well-Known Member

    7,038
    2,453
    Apr 22, 2019
    there are not 32 joe Burrows or Mahomes, but yes you need A QB that can be consistently good. IDK if KP is the guy, but another year on the rookie deal before having to decide on the 5th year option is worth the wait (and perhaps getting a high quality if one drops in the draft rd 2). If you get Murray you get everything that comes with it, huge CAP hit, how many picks it costs, and the injury potential already shown, plus (warranted or not) the drama he brings. No doubt he is a good and exciting player, but that cost is very high.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Vox Ferrum

    Vox Ferrum Well-Known Member

    7,038
    2,453
    Apr 22, 2019
    I'm not saying you are wrong, but getting and keeping a good back up is not an easy task. Batch was not a great QB, was a good and competent guy, who came home and built a nice life. If you draft a guy who is decent, other teams are going to offer more when the time comes to see if he could be their guy, or be a back up for a young guy they are developing. It's easy to say we should have got so and so, but the CAP still generates what you are able to pay. Trevor Simmon is still on a roster, that shows QB depth is sparce.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. The Sodfather

    The Sodfather Well-Known Member

    16,419
    3,340
    Nov 17, 2014
    This is a talking point and nothing more. Anyone that's followed the Steelers for any amount of time knows full well they'd never go down this rabbit hole. If he is on the block, someone will. It just won't be the Steelers. I'm not saying Murray couldn't help a team. His cost is too high for what he is in my opinion.

    These sports journalists whether real or imagined come up with all manner of outrageous "headlines" to discuss. This is another example.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. mytake

    mytake Well-Known Member

    3,806
    1,922
    Dec 26, 2016
    Could you imagine Murray asking Canada for advice in playing Madden?
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  16. mikeyg

    mikeyg Well-Known Member

    5,686
    1,224
    Dec 23, 2020

    you never draft a guy to be your backup QB - that is part of where Tomlin and Co have failed miserably. you want a veteran, like Batch. Washed out as a starter. Mitch could have been that guy, but he really does suck.

    Garrapolo might be that guy soon. Dobbs could be that guy. He could be.

    Better, a 30 yr old journeyman, been a starter for 5+ years than a draft pick, that is for SURE!
     
  17. Vox Ferrum

    Vox Ferrum Well-Known Member

    7,038
    2,453
    Apr 22, 2019
    I would tend to agree, but finding that vet who can consistently perform is often a shot in the dark. QB's often come into a game and play well, only to go back to the reason they failed as a starter. and while you do not draft for a back up, there has been talk in the past about failing to develop young QB's, but again that is a demonstration in futility because after a 3 or 4 year window they can go to greener pasture. Mike White is a guy who stuck with it, likely knows he has reached his limit on how far he will go, but still turned it into 2 year 4.5 guarantee, with a possible 8 mill total. That's not a bad cap number, but basically what a team pays..some more, some less for journeymen.
     
  18. Thor

    Thor

    3,718
    1,420
    Mar 20, 2014
    Not sure what you mean here. In general, option bonuses go with the player to his new team because there are triggers for them to be earned (i.e., still a member of the roster, worked out with the rest of the team in the offseason, etc.). These differ from signing bonus prorations which represent money that has already been paid to the player for signing the contract.

    That said though, your calculations all look good to me. You allocated Murray's workout and per game bonuses in 2024, in addition to his future roster bonuses, to the club hypothetically trading for him. As you mention, it offers a prospective trade partner cap flexibility since they wouldn't be burdened with the signing bonus prorations, and should they want to keep him and mitigate the cap hit from his larger base salary years they could convert money there, or the roster/workout/per-game bonuses, to signing bonus and extend the contract. Though I'd expect Murray's camp would want a restructure with any trade (if not already included somewhere in the current framework) since it would eliminate the bulk of guarantees/commitment away after the $35M in 2024.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  19. steel machine

    steel machine Well-Known Member

    15,074
    5,484
    Sep 21, 2017
    There was a member who had Malik Willis is the answer in his signature. I never heard of the guy until then so I looked him up. I too thought he could be a possible contender to Ben's throne but as of now I'll take Pickett. Still early in both players career.
     
  20. SteelersFanCanada

    SteelersFanCanada Well-Known Member

    2,505
    602
    Nov 14, 2019
    Kyler Murray is 1 year older than Kenny Pickett
     
  21. steel machine

    steel machine Well-Known Member

    15,074
    5,484
    Sep 21, 2017
    Fuzzy memory but I think Fran's great scrambling ability was his biggest asset. He made a lot of throws on the run so he could see downfield.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  22. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    25,376
    4,139
    Dec 18, 2016
    He has had more time in the NFL to show what he is, and that is a gifted but inconsistent quarterback who struggles to stay healthy. No way is he worth the draft capital and cap hit.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  23. AFan

    AFan Well-Known Member

    3,716
    793
    Oct 24, 2011
    Trading for Kyler would be the most un-Steeler move of all time. Give up a high pick, take on a huge salary and admit after only 2 yrs that the QB drafted in Round #1 was a flop. Even if it as a a good football move - and it’s not- organizational arrogance would preclude it.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  24. Thor

    Thor

    3,718
    1,420
    Mar 20, 2014
    I think it bears mentioning that Murray was relatively healthy until 2022. He played all of 2019 and '20 and half of 2021 until missing three games with an ankle injury. In 2022 he missed two games (can't recall the specific injury) just before tearing the ACL.

    That said, his diminutive size for the position has always been a concern, whether over potential health or performance issues in the NFL. And I agree that he would be too much risk for the price tag he carries.
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2023
    • Agree Agree x 1
  25. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    11,969
    2,964
    Nov 5, 2011
    [​IMG]


    A nice joke. I feel Pickett will get 2 more years with a new offensive coordinator.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!