1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

dj swearinger

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by freakfontana, May 11, 2015.

  1. freakfontana

    freakfontana

    5,445
    23
    Oct 19, 2011
    freakfontana, May 11, 2015
    freakfontana, May 11, 2015
    #1
  2. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,923
    4,968
    Nov 4, 2011
    I kinda liked him in college, although I put a lot less value on him than the Texans.

    I have to wonder what's going on when a starter playing under his rookie contract is deemed expendable. If he brings anything to the table, why would the Texans be looking to part ways with him? Even as a backup he's relatively cheap. It doesn't add up.
     
    Steel_Elvis, May 11, 2015
    Steel_Elvis, May 11, 2015
    #2
  3. thorn058

    thorn058 Well-Known Member

    16,570
    4,362
    Oct 19, 2011
    It could just be that he doest fit the scheme at all which does happen when you have a coaching change. He was drafted by Kubiak wasn't he?
     
    thorn058, May 11, 2015
    thorn058, May 11, 2015
    #3
  4. SC Gamecock

    SC Gamecock

    1,893
    299
    Oct 18, 2011
    SC Gamecock, May 11, 2015
    SC Gamecock, May 11, 2015
    #4
  5. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,923
    4,968
    Nov 4, 2011
    So i read a PFT article on this, and the reader comments pretty much universally slammed Swearinger fir being dirty. I don't recall much about what he's done, but one of the plays mentioned was a career ender for Dustin Keller. If indeed he is a dirty player, we don't need that type of addition to the roster. Note that I said "if." I don't know whether he is a dirty player as many claim. It would make the release of a starter playing under a rookie contract more explainable though.
     
    Steel_Elvis, May 11, 2015
    Steel_Elvis, May 11, 2015
    #5
  6. Busman

    Busman

    7,824
    1,072
    Oct 18, 2011
    Busman, May 11, 2015
    Busman, May 11, 2015
    #6
  7. steel1031

    steel1031 Well-Known Member

    3,825
    239
    Oct 16, 2011
    i dont know. if he was any count why are they letting him go. he was a good college player but nobody wanted landon Collins in the draft because he was a liability covering. have you seen dj?
     
    steel1031, May 11, 2015
    steel1031, May 11, 2015
    #7
  8. SC Gamecock

    SC Gamecock

    1,893
    299
    Oct 18, 2011
    Yeah well people call Ryan Clark and James Harrison dirty too...
     
    SC Gamecock, May 11, 2015
    SC Gamecock, May 11, 2015
    #8
  9. SC Gamecock

    SC Gamecock

    1,893
    299
    Oct 18, 2011
    Oh, and how can we forget the Baltimoron fans calling Hines Ward cheap... :rolleyes:
     
    SC Gamecock, May 11, 2015
    SC Gamecock, May 11, 2015
    #9
  10. cajunyankee

    cajunyankee Well-Known Member

    4,126
    684
    Oct 27, 2011
    PPF had him ranked 71 out of 87 eligible players in 2013 and 78 of 86 in 2014. He was good in college and was drafted high but couldn't translate college success to the NFL.

    I say no to brining him in. Also this is what scares me about Golson. Here's to hoping for the best.

    Cajun
     
    cajunyankee, May 11, 2015
    cajunyankee, May 11, 2015
    #10
  11. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    33,228
    8,092
    Nov 14, 2011
    Not interested in him cheap shot artist.
     
    steelersrule6, May 11, 2015
    steelersrule6, May 11, 2015
    #11
  12. SC Gamecock

    SC Gamecock

    1,893
    299
    Oct 18, 2011
    :rolleyes: Funny how the league didn't fine him on numerous hits that people consider "cheap." This is what the NFL has asked for with not hitting high, so take it up with them
     
    SC Gamecock, May 12, 2015
    SC Gamecock, May 12, 2015
    #12
  13. Steellamb86

    Steellamb86 Well-Known Member

    253
    111
    Apr 8, 2015
    What I read today is that he did not want to play special teams so the Texans cut him...no need for that on our team.
     
    Steellamb86, May 12, 2015
    Steellamb86, May 12, 2015
    #13
  14. SC Gamecock

    SC Gamecock

    1,893
    299
    Oct 18, 2011
    if that's the case, I agree
     
    SC Gamecock, May 12, 2015
    SC Gamecock, May 12, 2015
    #14
  15. freakfontana

    freakfontana

    5,445
    23
    Oct 19, 2011
    anyway he has to clean the waivers and bucs and falcons seems very interested .
     
    freakfontana, May 12, 2015
    freakfontana, May 12, 2015
    #15
  16. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    33,228
    8,092
    Nov 14, 2011
    What a surprise you're defending him, it must be due to the fact he played at South Carolina.
     
    steelersrule6, May 12, 2015
    steelersrule6, May 12, 2015
    #16
  17. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    33,228
    8,092
    Nov 14, 2011
    Tampa Bay claimed him.
     
    steelersrule6, May 12, 2015
    steelersrule6, May 12, 2015
    #17
  18. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    23,288
    2,324
    Oct 12, 2011
    Steelers were reportedly 1 of the 8 teams that put in a waiver claim.
     
    TerribleTowelFlying, May 13, 2015
    TerribleTowelFlying, May 13, 2015
    #18
  19. SC Gamecock

    SC Gamecock

    1,893
    299
    Oct 18, 2011
    Always running your mouth. I'm stating "facts," consider googling the meaning of that word
     
    SC Gamecock, May 13, 2015
    SC Gamecock, May 13, 2015
    #19
  20. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    33,228
    8,092
    Nov 14, 2011
    Why don't you google sucky player which Swearinger is :roflmao:
     
    steelersrule6, May 13, 2015
    steelersrule6, May 13, 2015
    #20
  21. SC Gamecock

    SC Gamecock

    1,893
    299
    Oct 18, 2011
    Dunno...wasn't too sucky for your boy Tomlin considering he put a waiver on him :hmmm:
     
    SC Gamecock, May 13, 2015
    SC Gamecock, May 13, 2015
    #21
  22. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    33,228
    8,092
    Nov 14, 2011
    It's not Tomlin decision anyway, Colbert makes the personnel decisions :shrug:
     
    steelersrule6, May 14, 2015
    steelersrule6, May 14, 2015
    #22
  23. SC Gamecock

    SC Gamecock

    1,893
    299
    Oct 18, 2011
    Alright, thus meaning that Tomlin liked him and Colbert apparently agreed...lol
     
    SC Gamecock, May 16, 2015
    SC Gamecock, May 16, 2015
    #23

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!