1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Higher in the all-time list:Brees vs Ben?

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Steelersfan43, Jul 20, 2026 at 5:27 PM.

  1. Steelersfan43

    Steelersfan43 Well-Known Member

    12,986
    3,562
    Aug 10, 2016
    This is very impressive that Warner was able to lead one of the worst franchise in sports history to the super bowl!...And it was with a terrible head coach.Whiz was a great OC but his record without Warner in his career as head coach was hot garbage!
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  2. jeh1856

    jeh1856 Chilling by the pool

    41,239
    14,308
    Oct 26, 2011
    Ben does not belong in the same sentence with asparagus
     
  3. NorthernBlitz

    NorthernBlitz Well-Known Member

    2,431
    802
    Sep 5, 2025
    We agree on the bold part.

    But you seem to be arguing that this made Brees more "dominant". Really it made him more "consistent"...which he certainly was.

    I think it's clear that the highs that Ben had (early in his career) were better than Brees ever was.

    Ben was much better than Brees early in their careers.

    Brees was better than Ben later in their careers. Because he stayed more consistent than Ben as he aged. I think because what made Ben special was (1) his ability to take physical abuse (2) his willingness to take big risks (and win) and (3) his competitiveness / need to win. As he got older, points (1) and (2) declined (but not 3). So he couldn't take as many big risks, and his ability to convert on those risks declined. Brees was more of a traditional QB, so he stayed more consistent (declined slower).

    Brees was a very good player. Deserves to be in the Hall of Fame. You'd be very happy to have him as your QB (unless you're the Chargers apparently). He was more consistent across his entire career. But I don't think there's a run for Brees like Ben had from 2004 - 2010.

    So I'd take Ben for their entire careers because his highs were higher.

    If we're only talking post GB SB, I think there's a much better argument for Brees. Although since Brees won his SB before that, it's still close. Although Brees won more playoff games after 2010 (5 vs 3), Ben made the playoffs more times (6 vs 5). I think we would have had better playoff results if we were in the NFC too. Because the AFC has had the majority of the elite QBs for all of Ben's career.
     
  4. NorthernBlitz

    NorthernBlitz Well-Known Member

    2,431
    802
    Sep 5, 2025
    As always QBs are much more important than HCs.

    Even for very good HCs. Especially for mediocre HCs like Whiz.
     
  5. NorthernBlitz

    NorthernBlitz Well-Known Member

    2,431
    802
    Sep 5, 2025
    Aside from all of this, I really thought Brees did good stuff off the field re: hurricane Katrina.

    And thinking that he isn't as good as Ben isn't anything close to a slight.
     
  6. HeinzMustard

    HeinzMustard Well-Known Member

    14,398
    3,875
    Nov 18, 2015
    Also... Brees didn't have to deal with the Ravens and Bengals (Palmer, Dalton, Burrow years). The NFC South has been one of the worst divisions since the realignment in 2002. While AFC North has usually been strong.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Steelvision

    Steelvision Well-Known Member

    2,541
    595
    Jun 28, 2022
    i already have.
     
  8. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    49,164
    12,520
    Oct 16, 2011
    Dude you are losing me more and more with this argument, there is no universe that I am picking Brees to QB my team over Ben. Rodgers yes but not Brees.

    It’s extreme hyperbole IMO to say a QB as great as Ben cant be mentioned along other QB’s but that goes back to my first post in this thread, Ben doesnt get the appreciation he deserves.
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!