1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Will Howard

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by THREE RIVER SHIVER, Jan 16, 2026.

  1. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    47,730
    11,736
    Oct 16, 2011
    That hand injury was really unfortunate. Big set back.
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
  2. NorthernBlitz

    NorthernBlitz Well-Known Member

    1,566
    467
    Sep 5, 2025
    Mason is probably somewhere around an average backup. Maybe even a little above average.

    And after almost getting drummed out of the league, I bet he appreciates being here.

    He's a good guy to have on the roster IMO. Cap hit < $5MM this year.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. jeh1856

    jeh1856 We want in so we can bark to go out again

    38,557
    13,404
    Oct 26, 2011
    Rudolph is your main concern

    Really

    I see bigger holes
     
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2026 at 10:29 AM
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. Steelpens65

    Steelpens65 Well-Known Member

    13,809
    2,557
    Nov 28, 2021
    This is true
    And we actually have a coaching staff
    With a coach that has actually developed qbs
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Trafalgar

    Trafalgar Well-Known Member

    2,752
    419
    Sep 26, 2016

    Who said it was my main concern?
     
  6. forgotten1

    forgotten1 Well-Known Member

    11,665
    2,899
    Mar 4, 2022
    to not show "interest" is lazy
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Born2Steel

    Born2Steel Well-Known Member

    4,514
    1,610
    Jul 7, 2023
    @MojoUW@MojoUW asked me in one thread, what QB development and team building has MM actually done for him to have earned this reputation. So...I went on the interweb and did some research on it. The ONLY QB of note that MM has drafted is Brett Hundley in the 5th round of the 2015 draft. Now, McCarthy was hired by the Packers for the 2006 season, and Rodgers was drafted in 2005, so maybe he some gets credit for Arod's career? MM went to coach Dallas in 2020, and Dak had been the QB since 2016. Although, MM did get the Cowboys to 3 consecutive 12-5 seasons, I don't believe Dak had some big leap during those years.
    All this to say, I don't have an answer for @MojoUW@MojoUW.

    Now, as you point out, it could be the staff around MM that is developing QBs. Our QB coach is still Tom Arth. I don't know anything about our new OC. I need to take some time and research him a bit before the draft gets here. Try to get some idea how this group will approach draft 2026.

    My opinion only. For this draft, QBs that have not taken snaps from under Center should be taken off the draft board. I know about Big Ben and how he hated direct snaps, but there are no Big Bens in this draft. If the plan is to go with a rookie QB, we have one already. Use Will Howard first.
     
    • Like Like x 4
  8. MojoUW

    MojoUW Well-Known Member

    1,014
    369
    Aug 16, 2023
    I found another one....https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BrooAa00.htm

    McCarthy was offensive coordinator from 2000-2004. I think he gets credit for whatever anyone thinks of Aaron Brooks. Because it certainly wasn't Jim Haslett doing QB things.
     
  9. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    47,730
    11,736
    Oct 16, 2011
    MM’s QB school is renowned for improving QB’s. Rodgers obviously had elite talent but MM helped refine his game. People think Rodgers hit the ground running but his first year starting was uneven with inconsistency and accuracy problems as well as bad turnovers in key moments. He didnt breakout until 2009. MM helped fix his mechanics and developed the offense around his strengths. Rodgers has talked about how much he helped develop him.

    Dak was of course already a good QB but supposedly he had his best years under MM, I have not looked that up to confirm but seems silly to lie about such an easily verifiable claim. He also made Cooper Rush look good.

    His work with Flynn had him cash in on a starting job and also developed Alex Smith.

    I have no doubt that is the biggest reason the Steelers hired him like they claim, to develop the next QB whomever that may be.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  10. Mr.wizard

    Mr.wizard Well-Known Member

    134
    33
    Aug 27, 2025
    In my opinion Will Howard has a steep hill to climb to get to starting QB, I doubt Mcarthy took the job with the idea of "developing" Will Howard, I'm sure Mcarthy has his guy already in mind.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  11. Born2Steel

    Born2Steel Well-Known Member

    4,514
    1,610
    Jul 7, 2023
    This SI article gives a brief synopsis on the subject as far as the on the field practical. Personally, I don't care about what he did in the past as much as I do moving forward. I believe McCarthy and Arth have a very good rookie QB to work with in Will Howard. As good as any they might draft in this draft. Arth has already been working with Will since the last draft, which I think is important.
    https://www.si.com/nfl/steelers/ons...eelers-mike-mccarthy-quarterback-track-record
     
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2026 at 11:55 AM
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    47,730
    11,736
    Oct 16, 2011
    He took a job with a QB in mind that he doesnt have? Unless you’re are talking about Rodgers than that would be foolish of him. How could he be sure he would obtain the QB he wants.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. MojoUW

    MojoUW Well-Known Member

    1,014
    369
    Aug 16, 2023
    If you look past what MM "claims" you can see it is a pattern of exaggerated claims during the interview process, that MM doesn't even really believe.

    MM worked with Alex Smith his rookie year while Smith went 2-5 in his 7 starts and completed 50% of his passes with 1 TD and 11 INTs.

    MM was the o coordinator during Aaron Brooks first 4 seasons. Look up the stats and judge for yourself how impressed you are with the work there.

    MM can claim Matt Flynn: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/F/FlynMa00.htm -- for what you may judge that is worth. Flynn played out his career as a pretty good back-up QB.

    https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/G/GannRi00.htm -- Rich Gannon and MM were in KC together while Gannon was the back-up/starter with Grbac. Then Gannon left and took off with Oakland. MM claims it is him. Some say it was Jon Gruden once Gannon got to Oakland. Again, form your own opinions.

    The one extremely hard to deny success story is Aaron Rodgers. You can visually see that MM rebuilt Rodgers mechanics. Now, Rodgers had some good college stats: https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/aaron-rodgers-1.html and Rodgers was almost universally regarded as a first round pick. The biggest knock was that he was a "tedford qb" and viewed as mechanically rigid and robotic.

    You can read about it here: https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft05/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2039797 and here: https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl...ng-packers-draft-mvp/gywqhu5wifeau6gzt0ilawi4

    Almost all Tedford Qbs ended up being NFL busts (Harrington, Boller, Smith). The two success stories are Qbs that developed out of being rigid and robotic and then flourished - Goff and Rodgers. Rodgers shed it earlier and became a HOF Qb. Goff did it later and took his game to another level.

    Now, most living former NFL Qbs when asked to identify the "best" QB they have seen throw the ball, identify Rodgers. I've never read anyone doubting Goff's physical capabilities, just his mental approach.

    So, the question is....did MM rewire Rodgers brain and unleash his natural abilities or was that who Rodgers was going to be no matter what once he left Tedford's system? All those that failed, would say no. The similar journey that Goff took might say possible.

    But, lets give MM Aaron Rodgers. The rest? Look dubious at best. Certainly his claims for Montana, Prescott, and Favre are highly suspect. Smith as well. Flynn is his. Gannon, I figure he gets some credit but Gruden should likely get the lions share.

    Long story short...MM QB whisperer status rests largely (solely?) on how you judge his role in Aaron Rodgers career.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    47,730
    11,736
    Oct 16, 2011

    I know, you dont like MM but the QBs I mentioned all had success or went on to have success under MM’s tutelage. You can choose to believe he did or didnt have anything to do with it.

    I think most around the NFL feel his QB school is beneficial to getting the most out of QB’s. We’ll see.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    44,625
    11,630
    Dec 23, 2020
    They have seen him. Just because we haven't means nothing, because we won't be making the decisions.
     
  16. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    44,625
    11,630
    Dec 23, 2020
    Oh Geez that's a bad thing. I had a roommate during that time that was our bass player, and we both had Sunday ticket, and if the Steelers, and the Saints didn't play at the same time, we watched each other's games. I wouldn't use Aaron Brooks as a reference. LOL
     
  17. Mashburn

    Mashburn Well-Known Member

    6,294
    1,519
    Apr 30, 2021
    Some of these boys look great on college and camps, but game time is a different breed.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. MojoUW

    MojoUW Well-Known Member

    1,014
    369
    Aug 16, 2023
    It isn't about whether or not I like him or not.

    I do not trust anything that anyone claims about themselves. In my experience, people that make vast claims about themselves are almost universally full of crap.

    MM is a ceaseless and shameless self-promoter. Again, I have no experience with the NFL or anything NFL adjacent, but I have lived a lot of life outside the NFL. And I have never met anyone that is actually good at things that made the claims about themselves that MM does.

    The intriguing thing is that we can all look up the stats, the games, the "data" if you will that the claims are built on. To my totally untrained eye, the data is ambigous at best supporting MM's claims about his capabilities as a coach.

    I have no idea if it will or won't work out for MM with the Steelers. What I am asking people to do is to not just assume things to be true. Look at things and ask yourself if their is evidence to support the idea that MM was responsible for Montana, Favre, Brooks, Flynn, Gannon, Rodgers, Prescott, and the others he claims as his own.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. MojoUW

    MojoUW Well-Known Member

    1,014
    369
    Aug 16, 2023
    Yeah. I have no idea other than MM touts Brooks as a success story of his QB school approach.

    I couldn't even tell you what school Brooks went to much less how he played in college. Maybe, MM made him better even if that ultimate ceiling wasn't what people had hoped for?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    44,625
    11,630
    Dec 23, 2020
    I'm sure they have seen him running the offense at times in practice, of course that's different, but what I'm saying is they have seen a hell of a lot more than anyone here has.
     
  21. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    44,625
    11,630
    Dec 23, 2020
    All I can add, and believe me I don't dislike MM, I actually hope when he's done here we say he's the greatest HC the Steelers ever had, but I keep looking at a Qb that most everyone I know said was the greatest Qb ever, and I see one SB appearance, and it makes me think if he only got one SB appearance with the so called greatest Qb ever, what chance do we have.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  22. Mashburn

    Mashburn Well-Known Member

    6,294
    1,519
    Apr 30, 2021
    I rather trade a 3rd for Mac Jones. Abs ride with it. If Howard shows him up, awesome. If not, we have a decent QB.
     
  23. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    44,625
    11,630
    Dec 23, 2020
    I'm not against that. I thought Mac Jones would be a decent Qb in the NFL, but I'm not sure how good. My only thing is teams tend to play whomever cost them more , until they can't. So If we traded a 3rd for Mac Jones, and pay him, would that influence the team to try, and stick with him longer than they had to, even if a only slightly better Qb was on the team???
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  24. jeh1856

    jeh1856 We want in so we can bark to go out again

    38,557
    13,404
    Oct 26, 2011
    Ya think
     
  25. jeh1856

    jeh1856 We want in so we can bark to go out again

    38,557
    13,404
    Oct 26, 2011
    I stand corrected

    I mistakenly lumped him in with the click post riff raff
     
    • Like Like x 2

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!