1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Political Correctness gone WILD!

Discussion in 'General NFL Talk' started by blountforcetrauma, May 29, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    I heard today that 10 congressmen have sent a letter to Dan Snyder asking him to change the name of the Redskins to something that's not offensive. I know there has been talk of this in the past but for elected officials to seriously ask him to consider doing something like this is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard. Do you guys think there's any chance he will actually do it? I mean I at first thought there's no way but then I remembered this is the genius that gave Haynesworth a $150 million contract. So I guess anything is possible but if I were a huge Skins fan I would be threatening to NEVER go to another game or buy another thread of merch if he went through with this insanity. Just wanted to get your guys opinions on this. Surely NO one can support this. Well maybe... LOL.
     
  2. blackandgoldpatrol

    blackandgoldpatrol Well-Known Member

    5,455
    2,143
    Dec 5, 2011
    i don't see it changing anytime soon......... this has been going on as long as I can remember (and i'm no spring chicken!!!!).. in fact, I believe the Atlanta braves have been dealing with it even longer......... believe me when I say the redskins name will still be in place long after these particular congressmen have been voted out of office.
     
  3. ScottChab

    ScottChab Well-Known Member

    3,575
    0
    Oct 17, 2011
    I think the government should worry about more important stuff like the job industry, the housing industry, corruption, etc.

    just sayin'.
     
  4. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,092
    9,946
    Oct 16, 2011
    He said he won't change it and I quote:

    "We'll never change the name, it's that simple. NEVER -- you can use caps."

    That said, Government should stay out of it but I think people should be a little more understanding of Native Americans point of view on this. Do you think if their name was the Washington (N word) that it would be well received? Same exact thing. We basically stole their land and wiped out their race, they suffered a great deal, they still aren't afforded the same liberties even this many years later.
     
  5. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    But the gvt has given many reparations in regard to all that. I mean they literally ARE Indians right? I mean that if someone says I'm half Cherokee and you say "Cherokee what?" they would then say "indian" right? So do they mind being called indians or do they just not like being called "Redskins"? Where does the term actually come from? There is also a chew called "Red Man" which has an indian on it. I wonder if they've ever targeted that company or if they find that offensive? How many teams can you think of that are named after indians? I can think of the Cleveland Indians, the Braves, the Jayhawks, just off the top of my head. I wonder if indians have actually petitioned these congressmen or if they've just taken it upon themselves to solve all the world's "problems". LOL. But I can certainly see what you are saying about the n word though.
     
  6. Da Stellars

    Da Stellars Well-Known Member

    8,330
    1,096
    Oct 22, 2011
    He should change it. It is derogatory. Its wrong and this has nothing to do with political correctness era. Its wrong plain and simple.

    They would root for the team of D.C. no matter what it is called. Give me a break. Its not like they will move the team in Mayflower trucks over night to Indy.

    Tell me how "Redskins" is any different than this:
     

    Attached Files:

  7. Bleedsteel

    Bleedsteel

    2,425
    94
    Oct 16, 2011
    While I get your point, and agree that I am lucky I`m on the beneficial side of this equation.
    I have a great deal of sympathy for the Native Americans, who still want to keep their culture alive, and have a VERY hard time doing it, on the reservations, with their numbers severley thinned...
    For exactly the reasons you pointed out, I think they have bigger grievances, and it seems to be a small but vocal minority among them, who even really give a ... Ahem... I mean, CARE about an "insulting" sports team`s name, compared to the real issues they face...
    Not to be insensitive. That`s just how I see it.
    Living close to Cleveland, I have heard the debate about "Chief Wahoo", and the "Indians", all my life, and, like I said, it only seems to be a few "extremists"(pardon the choice of words, I guess their people would have been the "insurgents", pre-revolutionary war days), who really care about what our sports teams call themselves.
    For the most part, the majority of what is left of the Native American population has bigger things to care about...
    Just sayin...
    At least we let them have their casinos... (Sorry, that`s just wrong.) I should be ashamed of myself. "Lord, I apologize,that ain`t right, and God bless all them starvin pygmies in Africa"...:facepalm:
     
  8. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    I think San Franciso would really be named after a different group. I actually find stereotypes to be HILARIOUS. I think the Titans should be called the "Rednecks" really. There was a scene on The Office once where Jim accidentally caused everyone to be locked in and they were waiting on the black security guard to come and get them out and then the cleaning crew showed up and Jim said to the mexican named Oscar "hey the cleaning crew is here. Oscar ask them to let us out." and Oscar says "why do you just ASSUME they speak only spanish" and then he asks them in english and they stare blankly. He then asks them in spanish and they do it immediately and it's hilarious. I don't think the Redskins is MEANT to be derogatory and I would really love to see a poll among their people seeing what they think of it. Those hats are awesome though. LOL.
     
  9. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,092
    9,946
    Oct 16, 2011
    I think they prefer Native Americans, not sure if they ever targeted the Cleveland Indians name but do find the logo offensive. Not sure about Braves or Jayhawks, I don't know if those are considered racist names. But again, why is it that racists name for blacks, spanish, Jewish and so on, all completely unacceptable but no one bats an eye about racists names for native Americans. It's like people look at them as less then human, always been that way with their people.
     
  10. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    Remember that Tim McGraw song "indian outlaw"? There were a few people that found that offensive because it perpetuated stereotypes. It really is interesting though how people don't even really think about them. Actually it was a president from my state that sent them on the "Trail of Tears" and I've read that some of the soldiers that he sent to enforce the move were actually very disturbed and haunted for life by the treatment inflicted on them. Andrew Jackson had a pretty hardcore vendetta against them. I just don't think any offense is intended by the name and given the fact that it has existed for so long I just don't think it's that big of a deal and congressmen should really find something better to do than being the "PC Police". A dj on ESPN Radio was saying that he honestly thinks that a name like "hurricanes" could never be used for a new team because of Katrina and Sandy and people are just sorta sensitive about that kinda stuff now. It's like in South Carolina when they wanted the Confederate Flag taken down because they thought it represented slavery but really that's not at all what it was actually about but it was sorta guilt by association ya know? Ole Miss is still represented by a Confederate Flag right?
     
  11. Bleedsteel

    Bleedsteel

    2,425
    94
    Oct 16, 2011
    Yep...
    "Heritage, not hate"...
    But there are MANY who would disagree with that statement, and not understand that you truly believe that...
     
  12. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    Yeah for me when I see that flag I just think that it sorta represents "standing up to the man". I'm actually sort of a Civil War buff I guess you'd say and read a lot about it because I like that period of history. Actually a month or so ago I went to a museum that had an exhibit of a Confederate Flag that was carried during Pickett's Charge at Gettysburg. It was pretty cool. I could understand why people would think it means something different though. Even after 150 years most people don't even know why the Civil War was fought. It's a huge misconception to say that it was fought over slavery because that's really only telling the northern side of the story. The southerners thought they were fighting to preserve state's rights. There's actually a video on youtube of a Confederate soldier who was one of the oldest living veterans who actually got to testify before congress in the late 40's about why the war was fought and he flat out says that it was about state's rights from his perspective. They felt that the north was too politically dominant and was sorta bullying them and they considered the north to be aggressors. Actually the Confederate Flag was not the "Official" flag of the confederacy. I read a book a few months ago that went in to the history of the flag. I'm a huge dork. I know. LOL.
     
  13. ScottChab

    ScottChab Well-Known Member

    3,575
    0
    Oct 17, 2011
    There was a survey done a while ago (I posted a link in another thread but I'm too lazy to go look for it) that showed that a majority of Native Americans don't care about the name.
     
  14. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    Yeah I actually looked in to it last night and in 2004 there was a poll taken and like 91% of them said they were fine with it. Here it is http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycen...munication/naes/2004_03_redskins_09-24_pr.pdf
     
  15. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,092
    9,946
    Oct 16, 2011
    Yeah, I'm calling bull****, not that you posted the poll, but the poll itself. They probably polled people who have like an 1/8th of Native blood in them. There is no chance that a full blooded Native American, actual tribal members that would not be offended by it, it's a slur, why wouldn't they be??? And even if there are some who don't care, there are still others who do and that's all that matters.
     
  16. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,092
    9,946
    Oct 16, 2011
    Well considering there are roughly 5.2 million American Indians and Alaskan Natives residing in the US and they only polled 768 of them this survey is :bscow:

    Convenient too that they couldn't poll Alaska and Hawaii too. There are 565 Federally-Recognized Tribes, go walk into one of those and call them a Redskin.
     
  17. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    But do they consider the word "indian" to be an insult? The thing I noticed in that study is that the more educated ones thought it offensive but the less educated ones didn't. I would almost figure that either that comes from going to universities where political correctness runs amok or maybe they've studied their history more in depth and feel they've been really given the short end of the stick. I wonder if the reason that they don't really get noticed more is because slavery was such an issue and came after their horrible treatment and people have basically forgotten about it. On a side note though there have been other polls taken that show the same overwhelming support for the name.
     
  18. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    Well that's pretty much true because when something is found "offensive" it is generally the people in the minority that wind up getting something changed. Like the way that most people say "Merry Christmas" but there are a few who don't like it and they complain and people cave to them. A couple of years ago on Desperate Housewives a guy was going to have to get an operation and he wanted to be sure he had a good dr so he said "I don't want some guy that got their degree from the Phillipines working on me" and a couple of days later a spokesmen for a group of people from the Phillipines came out demanding an apology and said he would only accept their apology if they removed the line from all future dvd releases! I think if I were an indian I would want them to change the name because they've sucked so bad for so long and they're making them all look like losers. LOL.
     
  19. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,092
    9,946
    Oct 16, 2011
    I'm not a history buff, so I can't really answer why blacks have made so much strides in society while Indians haven't. It could be that Indians never wanted to be part of our society, it's why you still have tribes, they don't want to give up their heritage. And while 5.2 million Indians is a big umber, its tiny compared to how many African Americans there are in the US.

    Sorry Blount, but I'd have to see the data on any poll claiming that Indians don't care about the name, polling some college kid with no clue of his own heritage and just a trace of Indian blood in his veins is not going to give you an accurate result. And there probably are some who are ok with it, I mean black people are ok with calling each other the N word but you better not try it :lolol: Maybe to some Indians, since it's a sport thing it's ok but still, to many others it is not.

    (Oh, and no, they are Indians so I don't believe they have a problem with the word. But maybe they do and prefer Native Americans.)
     
  20. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    Well in the poll it said the college ones WERE offended by it. The reason they have tribes is because the gvt settled with them and gave them the land and they have certain sovereignty on their property. But they can't overrule federal law such as murder and things like that. There's actually a reservation in Cherokee NC about and hour and a half from here and I used to get to go there when I was little because I thought it was pretty fun. The old indians would come out there and do shows and play with the kids and stuff and it was pretty cool then. I went through there about 10 years ago and I was like "man this place is so little and lame but when I was little I thought it was awesome" LOL. Basically the reason they got sent out west was because Andrew Jackson believed in what's called "manifest destiny" which meant that he thought America should completely overtake the land all the way through Mexico. Jefferson Davis also thought this and to make that happen you had to move people that weren't willing to conform to your system of gvt. That's what caused the Trail of Tears. My wife's cousin is a history teacher and me and him debate history all the time and he was saying that he thought Andrew Jackson was the best president ever and that he was a good man and I said "tell that to the indians" and another history teacher that we are friends with was in on the discussion to and he was like "YEAH REALLY"! LOL.
     
  21. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,092
    9,946
    Oct 16, 2011
    What we did to Indians is a very ugly piece of our history and gets swept under the rug because of it. We murdered them and stole their land.

    What was the teachers response to you about the Trail of Tears? :lolol:
     
  22. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    He just thinks you can't sum up Andrew Jackson by that statement and I was like "dude he's like an early version of Fidel Castro" but as it is with most people who have pet politicians there is no convincing them otherwise. I mean he would never convince me that my two favorite presidents weren't great either. Lincoln is one and I might get in trouble if I say the other one but I was wearing a shirt with his face on it just today and someone said "I can't believe you would wear that shirt here at UPS" and I said " I can't believe you WOULDN'T!" but as it turns out he actually likes the guy too and said it was just disrespecting him to bring him in to UPS. LOL.
     
  23. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,092
    9,946
    Oct 16, 2011
    Why would anyone try and convince you that Lincoln wasn't great? I hope the other one isn't who I think it is! You'll have to page me with that one.
     
  24. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    Ok. I will. Just to make it fun though you should send me a pm with your best guess. LOL. Also I bet I know who you think it was too and it's probably not who you think.
     
  25. Myronwemissyinz

    Myronwemissyinz

    3,055
    12
    Oct 17, 2011
    And I catch **** here for bashing Obama??????:shrug:Go figure!!!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!