1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

With the 21st pick in the 2025 NFL Draft the Pittsburgh Steelers select

Discussion in 'The Bill Nunn Draft Room' started by steelersrule6, Feb 24, 2025.

  1. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,444
    1,724
    Sep 9, 2013
    True, he can make big plays... but its not consistent enough. He's caught 53 balls in 2 years. We need a lot more than a couple 3-4 big plays a year from someone other than GP.
     
  2. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,465
    4,791
    Nov 4, 2011
    I think you’re underselling what Austin can bring to the table. He’s a system guy. He’s the kind of receiver that can be a nightmare running choice routes like the Pats used to run with their slot receivers with high success. Do a few of this and then pop him on a vertical here and there out of the slot, and he’ll produce. The problem is we have a primitive passing offense that doesn’t play to his strengths. It really doesn’t play to ANY WR’s strengths other than allowing for some deep shots to GP.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    11,888
    2,933
    Nov 5, 2011
  4. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,444
    1,724
    Sep 9, 2013
    I actually have been a defender of Austin's, but I am also not delusional to think he's our #2 option for the future. He's a fine player as a 3rd/4th option in the offense that can make some big plays with his speed when the focus of the defense shifts elsewhere. He can bring a lot to the table, but when he is the #2 option on an offense, he's going to get stifled. He would thrive in an offense that is littered with threats, where he can get some room to operate and hit a big play.

    We gotta get more weapons... it just has to happen. Austin will benefit from it, but more importantly, the offense as a whole will be better for it.
     
  5. Thor

    Thor

    3,114
    1,222
    Mar 20, 2014
    Getting more weapons is always a good thing, but I think the pain point is Tomlin's preference for safer, more vanilla schemes on both sides of the ball that fail to take advantage of the weapons he actually has. In this day and age it's hard to rely upon having a bevy of talent at any one time, whether that be from cap limitations or injury.

    Basic schemes rely more upon the talent and execution of each individual player for success. We had DBs out there not knowing assignments in Week 16 while blitzing at the lowest rate we've had in over eight seasons. This allowed QBs to pick apart the secondary. Fitzpatrick is accounting for over $20M in cap to play a prevent version of free safety.

    Time and again you hear postgames that mention execution, doing a better job, weighty downs, etc., and they're all part of the game. But so is putting yourself in the best position to attack the opposition with the talent you have.
     
  6. SGSteeler

    SGSteeler Well-Known Member

    7,444
    1,724
    Sep 9, 2013
    Hard to argue with that. It makes having good players all the more important for us. If we aren't winning by out scheming them, we have to win by out playing them. Simply put, we just need to have better players.
     
  7. Thor

    Thor

    3,114
    1,222
    Mar 20, 2014
    I'm not disagreeing, just posing the thought that we also need better schemes. One can follow a rabbit hole down a long way trying to find answers for execution and 'we need to do better.'
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!