why no move?

we are going into bradyland with just 7 O-linemen.

it took 8 last week to finish the game and was one player away from using a TE as a tackle. why didn't we bring hubbard up from the PS if only to watch from the sideline? at the rate we lose linemen , how is this a good strategy? do we really need 40 TE's on the roster?

why has joe long not been tried at tackle? why is gilbert not even considered for the LT spot since he was the starter as camp started? didn't they know how he played before this? we brought in levi brown and lost him before he saw the field and no other move has been made. why?

 

Strategy? What is this strange word of which you speak?

 

along the lines of gameplanning
strateegeries

 

true jack.

 

i'm really leaning toward your two NC picks in the draft dar. ebron and hurst 1-2. now that's a stragetty.

 

As much as I hate to ask, what does our O-line (including backups) look like for this game?

 

LT beachum, foster,velasco,whimper,gilbert. Wallace, adams on the pine.

 

This doesn't inspire a lot of confidence. But neither does the regulars.

They should of brought Hubbard or Long up from the practice squad.

 

Why? Maybe the staff knows Hubbard and Long and their abilities better than we do. I thought they were not very good in preseason. That's why we kept Whimper and traded for Levi.

Also we need more DB's because we'll be playing a lot of 6 DB sets.

Cajun-

 

Serious question. Where does the idea that guys on the practice squad are better than the current starters come from?

 

I watched them play pretty well in preseason.

 

i thinkits probably like all the love for backup qbs
they are backups and PS for a reason

 

i beg to differ , personal evalutation is a big question mark here , dwyer - redman , mesko -butler, beachum- adams , mcfadden - kion wilson all the t. ends brought up ...
yes probably backups are nothing special but i willl not be sure at 100 %

 

so they are worse then our starters? impossible.

 

let's review now in the 4th qtr. , 2 down.