1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

What to do with Ben?????

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by SteelerFanInKC, Feb 7, 2012.

  1. SteelerFanInKC

    SteelerFanInKC Well-Known Member

    331
    9
    Nov 14, 2011
    Steelers must let Big Ben air it out

    Pittsburgh must cut ties to some old views on offense and let Roethlisberger loose

    Email
    By Peter Keating
    ESPN Insider
    Archive


    The New York Giants won Super Bowl XLVI because ultimately, their receivers made big plays and New England's didn't. After 56 minutes of thrilling, occasionally sloppy, dink-and-dunk chess, the Patriots tried to go deep, and couldn't, while the Giants tried to go deep, and did.

    And looking forward to next season, there is one team more than any other that should draw inspiration from the Giants' success: the Pittsburgh Steelers.

    Like the Giants, the Steelers are a venerable franchise and a smart organization, run by old-school ownership and led by a quarterback drafted in 2004 who has made a boatload of clutch plays on his way to winning two Super Bowls. And like the Giants, the Steelers are proud of their blue-collar identity: These are teams with long traditions of smashing opponents at the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball. But while the Giants successfully morphed into a big-play offense this season -- Eli Manning not only threw for 4,933 yards, but averaged 13.7 yards per completion, third-best in the NFL -- the Steelers were in flux.

    It's not just that Ben Roethlisberger suffered a broken thumb and a high ankle sprain, or that injuries kept Pittsburgh's offense from any semblance of continuity. It's that the Steelers kept relying on RB Rashard Mendenhall even though he completely lacked explosiveness, averaging just 1.6 yards after contact per carry last year, 46th in the NFL. (And you can't lay that on the O-line, because Isaac Redman ranked second in the league, but had fewer than half as many carries as Mendenhall.) It's that TE Heath Miller was effective but targeted just 75 times, 20th among tight ends, and often seemed to disappear toward the end of games. It's that WR Mike Wallace started out as a superstar, with 43 catches for 800 yards in the first eight games of the season, but then drifted to just 29 receptions for 393 yards in the last eight. Does Wallace need more help with double coverages? Does he need to run better routes? Did his rapport with Big Ben lose something when Antonio Brown arrived? Nobody's quite sure. But the bombs stopped falling his way after Halloween.

    Steelers fans loved to bash former offensive coordinator Bruce Arians for everything wrong with their team, and last month Arians packed his bags and went back to work for the Colts, where he was quarterbacks coach from 1998 to 2000. But Arians wasn't responsible for the fundamental problem that underlies all of Pittsburgh's issues: The Steelers want to remain a running team, but they're more effective when they pass. Without Arians, the big question is: How should they run the offense under Roethlisberger now?
     
  2. Bleedsteel

    Bleedsteel

    2,425
    94
    Oct 16, 2011
    Great article.
    No replies?
    My short answer...
    More balanced, and less predictable.
     
  3. black hat

    black hat Well-Known Member

    105
    10
    Oct 17, 2011
    I am so sick of people saying that Rooney and the fans want the Steelers to be a running team. I hear very few fans saying that. Most fans are saying what Mr. Rooney said: We need to be able to run more efficiently.
     
  4. ScottChab

    ScottChab Well-Known Member

    3,575
    0
    Oct 17, 2011
    x2
     
  5. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,477
    Oct 18, 2011
    Good article. A little contrary to most of the criticism we see on this board though. We all think we need to get back to establishing the pass with the run.
     
  6. SteelerJJ

    SteelerJJ Well-Known Member

    8,241
    465
    Oct 16, 2011
    Airing it out is fine but airing it out with 5 wide on 3rd and 1 not so much ... it's not as much about airing it out as how you're airing it out.
     
  7. diehardsteel

    diehardsteel Well-Known Member

    1,049
    0
    Oct 19, 2011
    I agreed with pretty much everything in the article except for this line: "But Arians wasn't responsible for the fundamental problem that underlies all of Pittsburgh's issues". Oh yes he was!
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!