1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

What if the Steelers played with deflated balls?

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by 86WardsWay, Jan 21, 2015.

  1. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,507
    10,133
    Oct 16, 2011
    Obviously :lolol:

    Good gravy :facepalm:
     
  2. Myronwemissyinz

    Myronwemissyinz

    3,055
    12
    Oct 17, 2011
    Stranger things have happened!!:emperor:
     
  3. BobbyBiz

    BobbyBiz Well-Known Member

    6,800
    816
    Nov 30, 2011
  4. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
  5. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    There's nothing damming about it. Anytime you have statistics, there's going to be a statistical outlier. There's always exceptions, always. Besides, there's always this...

    Bill Belichek very quickly yanks guys from games that fumble. Not to mention that for a few years they had a RB who simply doesn't fumble (BJGE). When you have a RB who never fumbles, that's going to make your numbers look pretty good.
     
  6. Lizard72

    Lizard72

    21,853
    1,840
    Oct 23, 2011
    Of course there are ways to manipulate that data any way you want to get conclusions...

    There are even guys arguing that the gauge was not calibrated properly or that a different gauge was used etc...

    One guy in the comments even said the same (sic) "We don't know how much lower the pressures were, it could have only been .7 which could be explained by temperature" (sic). When we do know they said it wasn't a minor change.

    To me it comes back to the fact that someone did it and it couldn't have been the first time. Brady had to know they were different and if it doesn't help anything...Why do it?
     
  7. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    "It couldn't have been the first time." You're quite possibly right, but I don't believe in crucifying people with proof. If there was proof it happened in previous games then fine, but simply going back to show they were better than their competition isn't proof of anything except them being good at ball control. If you believe something, you can usually find some statistic somewhere to support your argument.
     
  8. AFan

    AFan Well-Known Member

    3,730
    800
    Oct 24, 2011
    Agree, beware the article with the words "Statistically Impossible" in the title. In a world of 7 billion people, one in 16000 shots happen every minute.

    Over the last 2 yrs the Pats have fumbled more than the Pittsburgh Steelers. They've also outfumbled their two playoff opponents so far this yr. Does that prove anything?
     
  9. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,507
    10,133
    Oct 16, 2011
    Difference being is Rodgers has never been caught cheating, if people want to give NE the benefit of the doubt, that's their choice but as far as Im concerned, NE lost that right. I dont care who is responsible for deflating the footballs, this is the second time that organization has been involved in a cheating scandal. If it waddles and quacks like a duck...
     
  10. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    You'd think I would have that attitude considering I work around convicted felons, but I always want proof, and past wrongdoing isn't proof to me. Besides, taping defensive signals (which at one time was legal) is very different than tampering with game balls.
     
  11. Lizard72

    Lizard72

    21,853
    1,840
    Oct 23, 2011
    It was more than just taping those signals. They had practices in there and had a guy assigned to dissect and catalog them.


    No telling what else was there though. When Anti-trust exemptions are on the line, you get rid of evidence quickly.
     
  12. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    Absolutely, Blast! They are establishing a culture of cheating in New England and that's been proven on more than one occasion now. The point is that they are knowingly breaking the rules to try to give themselves an advantage.
     
  13. thesteeldeal

    thesteeldeal Well-Known Member

    13,841
    1,898
    Oct 18, 2011
    I will never forgive them for robbing us of a chance at another SB in 2004. We trounced them in the regular season ,then they returned the favor the n the playoffs. It was the game that Hines said after the game they were calling out our plays. I hate them scumbags...l
     
  14. Myronwemissyinz

    Myronwemissyinz

    3,055
    12
    Oct 17, 2011
    This is a excerpt from a article published today written by Howard Ulman of AP sports....

    A former NFL ball boy said it's easy to remove air from a ball discreetly with a small pin that fits in the palm of a hand.
    "This isn't a big deal. Everyone does it because each quarterback likes a different grip," Nader Kawash, a Philadelphia Eagles ball boy from 1996-2000, told The AP. "I'm not saying a ball boy or equipment guy did anything on purpose to cheat. Sometimes the balls are overinflated so it's easy to take some air out on the sideline without the referees noticing. You can use a helmet pin. Players can stand around in a circle. Anybody can do it."


    Complete article.....

    http://www.myfoxal.com/story/27925858/nfl-says-no-conclusion-yet-on-pats-deflated-footballs
     
  15. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,507
    10,133
    Oct 16, 2011
    I know, I'd think you'd be more of a cynic!
     
  16. contract

    contract Well-Known Member

    2,185
    16
    Jan 11, 2014
    It had to have been the Pats, because the Magic Football Fairy has a rock solid alibi.
     
  17. BobbyBiz

    BobbyBiz Well-Known Member

    6,800
    816
    Nov 30, 2011
    This.
    I was going to reply until I saw your post.
    Everyone forgets, especially New England fans, that it wasn't just "video taping" signals but rather a much deeper and more involved process. It drives me nuts when I hear a Chowda Head dismiss the whole thing as just stealing signals and everyone does it.
     
  18. BobbyBiz

    BobbyBiz Well-Known Member

    6,800
    816
    Nov 30, 2011
    Did anyone catch BBs presser yesterday? My thoughts as written in another thread.....

     
  19. BobbyBiz

    BobbyBiz Well-Known Member

    6,800
    816
    Nov 30, 2011
    Ok, I just read the transcript here.....http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/new-...cript-bill-belichicks-defense-of-the-patriots.


    What Im getting from this is that at best they can explain a drop of 1 PSI through ball preparation. And the addition .5 to 1 PSI they can't explain so he's putting that on the refs. :rolleyes:

    I understand that intense rubbing of the ball to scuff and prep the outside surface can cause the bladder and air inside to raise and will give a false reading, but I still have questions. How long after the ball prep is stopped does it take for the bladder and internal air pressure to equalize and return to normal? I ain't no scientist, but I cant imagine that it would take very long. And how long after this intense prep and subsequent heating of the internal air are the balls inflated by the refs? Is it quick enough that the internal air and bladder are still high enough to give a false reading? Any scientists here what to chime in? And what about the sheer number of balls? It seems to me that there would have to be numerous people, possible as many as 12, one per ball, preparing these things because if it were only one or two guys by the time they got to the last few balls, wouldn't the first few have already started to equalize their internal air temps?

    IMO for his explanation to be true, there would have to be 12 guys each prepping a ball at the same time. They then would have to immediately take the balls to the refs who would have to immediately inflate the balls to something less than the minimum PSI and measure them with faulty equipment.

    To me this doesn't explain anything and is what happens when a bunch of dumb jocks play scientist. :facepalm:
     
  20. thesteeldeal

    thesteeldeal Well-Known Member

    13,841
    1,898
    Oct 18, 2011
    Another question is how come if they are so precise and calculated in how they prep their footballs and the weather was the factor,how come when they have played in much worse and colder conditions under inflation was never a issue? Hmm. They are blaming a approximate 25 degree temp difference made this happen. What happened when they payed in sub-freezing temperatures the ball would be flat as a pancake. Or do they have to adjust the Psi accordinggly ?They knew and know exactly what they're doing. Brady said he likes his footballs at exactly12.5 then goes on to say he can't tell a difference. They sent the bold face liar up their to talk to the media because they know Brady is about to crack.
     
  21. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    Well I don't think any of us can answer this because we are mostly a bunch of dumb jocks too. LOL. My buddy, a big Brady fan, yesterday told me that he saw a Harvard professor on some sports show saying that it is totally plausible what Brady was saying and that the weather played a role in this. I don't think we will ever truly know unless TMZ pays their ball boys to spill the beans.
     
  22. snipit73

    snipit73

    1,697
    96
    Oct 23, 2011
    Sorry! I can't see it! Out of ALL of those footballs 11 were underinflated and they all belonged to the Patsy's! Not buyin' it:thumbsdown:
     
  23. Yogi4

    Yogi4 Well-Known Member

    1,018
    14
    Oct 24, 2011

    Your right!
    That would be fine if all the balls were the same for each team. I wonder why all of the Colts balls were properly inflated???????

    This is only speculation but I think that Brady either has paid with money or some other type of bartering like tickets to the ball boys or someone that has control for that brief window before the game. I would also bet this has been happening at home games for a long time. Just a thought to ponder.
     
  24. thesteeldeal

    thesteeldeal Well-Known Member

    13,841
    1,898
    Oct 18, 2011
    To me it boils down to this ,what is easier to believe, them lying/cheating or the weather only effecting their footballs. I know what my money is on.
     
  25. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    A Harvard professor? Harvard is where again? Oh that's right, NEW ENGLAND! Probably a delusional Pats fan!
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!