I'm curious, because of some of the personnel decisions they've made over the course of several years. Looking at the situation they had and having to play guys that were cut multiple times and not dressed for most of the year, what goes into those decision? You had a bunch of unproven players showing that they could step up and play (some better than the starters they replaced). What's really going on with the player evaluations? Or is it just that those guys were more hungry for the chance that they played above their ceilings?