1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Warren > Harris

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Joel Buchsbaum, Oct 18, 2025 at 7:24 AM.

  1. forgotten1

    forgotten1 Well-Known Member

    9,460
    2,435
    Mar 4, 2022
    Too far north and Canada wouldn't be happy
     
  2. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    26,601
    4,391
    Dec 18, 2016
    Do you disagree that a strong passing game can open things up for the running game?
     
  3. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    26,601
    4,391
    Dec 18, 2016
    No, it really isn't. Warren was dominant when he played. Gainwell may have only gotten three carries, but the snap count was much closer. There were far too many plays when Warren was on the sideline. The Steelers don't trust him with as heavy a workload as they gave Harris in the past. Given how well he was running, I would have liked to see Warren get five more carries. It is fair to argue that he didn't get them because the Steelers don't have as much faith in his durability as they had in Harris when he was a Steeler.
     
  4. forgotten1

    forgotten1 Well-Known Member

    9,460
    2,435
    Mar 4, 2022
    Cincy game

    Warren 37 of 57 snaps

    Gainwell 20 of 57
     
  5. Steelvision

    Steelvision Well-Known Member

    1,554
    382
    Jun 28, 2022
    Yeah i am. 14 carries on the season with an ave below 3. Its not looking good so far. But notice i said it “looks” like a wasted pick, not “is”. Keep in mind Warren went undrafted and yet has performed better than our 1st round pick (Najee) and our third (Johnson). Maybe we need to spend our high end draft capital on other areas…
     
  6. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    26,601
    4,391
    Dec 18, 2016
    That's odd. Weren't they both on the field at the same time for a few plays?
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!