Upon further review.........Sanders' "fumble"

I still think all those claiming a fumble was clear would have their eyes opened had he caught that pass in the endzone and then lost it the same way. I guarantee the refs would have ruled it incomplete on the field and after replay they would have upheld it as incomplete. It seems to me there are possibly diufferences in how these stupid definitions of catches are implemented depending on if they occur on the field of play or in the endzone.

 

Yes, I meant to mention that and forgot. For whatever 100% retarded reason, being in the end zone makes a difference, as does going to the ground.

 

I guess I'm in the minority. According to my interpretation of the rules, it was an incomplete pass. What he did was tantamount to a bobble. He never had total control of the ball.
But hey, it's all good-- we won!!