They Beat the Browns, But....

I don't need to rewatch the game. He was credited by the people who watch and tabulate the games with 0 sacks, 1 tackle, 1 QB hit, 0 QB hurries. It is impossible for him to "get pressure often" and be credited with only a single QB hit for the game. I'm not arrogant enough to say I know the game better than the people who tabulate the stats. I remember Garrett's hit too. I literally don't remember him existing the rest of the game. You are just factually wrong, and that's okay. Just don't try to throw it in someone's face like "I'm right, go watch the game" because you know I am not going to do that just to prove you wrong. You've already been proven wrong.

 

No, I'm not factually wrong. Anybody who credited Garrett with zero quarterback hurries is factually wrong.

https://steelersdepot.com/2023/09/f...rrett is able to,positive play for the Browns.

 

I was on an article that had quoted PFF's evaluation. Even if he gets credit for the two he is credited with here... Is 0 sacks, 1 QB hit and 2 hurries pressuring often? We dropped back to pass 30 times. Is pressure on 6.66% of the snaps and 3.33% time hitting the QB considered often? Are those big time win rates?

These were the cherry picked best snaps of the game for him. You still are factually incorrect in the assessment that he had pressure all game long. Could've switched his jersey with anyone else and would have barely noticed.

 

At least one of the plays they showed there probably wasn't credited as a hurry, but he was the one who flushed Pickett from the pocket. There were others. Nice try, though.

 

Statements of uncertainty "Probably"... Followed by broad definitive statements meant to put the onus on others to prove you wrong instead of proving your point "There were others"... End with a standard "I'm speaking down to you" phrase. Top tier post. Good work.

 

No. No those are not big time win rates.

 

It's better than your lame attempt at a gotcha, but I do appreciate the sarcasm.

I don't know which two plays they credited a hurry. If a defender flushes a quarterback from the pocket but isn't close to him when he finally throws it, I've seen it judged multiple ways. That is why I used the word probably. I'm sorry the gotcha attempt didn't work out fo you. Maybe next time.

 

I don't need a gotcha, that tactic is usually reserved for people who don't deal in facts. I've put out the facts and they say you are wrong. You're just wrong. But I guess if you say it loud enough, someone other than you will believe it.

 

So far the Browns are dominating the Titans with the great Derrick Henry and Hopkins. Steelers may be bad, but the defenses that they’ve faced are really good

 

Yeah as bad as Kenny was against the Browns, he still played better against them than Burrow or Tannehill. Both the Bengals and Titans were held to 3 points against the Browns defense.