The #4 pick in the draft.... Who to take????

Interesting part of this article on the impact of the Rams trade. Last paragraph, concerning the Steelers.......

http://www.grantland.com/blog/the-trian ... ftershocks

C'mon Matt Kalil!!!!!!!!!!

 

That is possibly the dumbest article I've ever seen... Not flaming you, but them.

"Wouldn't you rather have Wallace than Blackmon?"
Ummm... no. I'd trade Wallace for Blackmon in about .3 seconds. Wallace is an elite talent for sure, but I think Blackmon = T.O. (in skill set not attitude)... and as bad a rap as T.O. gets, he's a hall of famer as far as talent goes.



But to answer your question, I'd go Kalil if he were there (but he'll go to the Vikes), so it'd be Morris Claiborne.

 

blackmon and hill in the first? teamed with brown and sanders? somebody get on the horn to BA.

 

No, I wholeheartedly agree with you. The article just spurred a dreamlike state in me that we could get to the #4 pick and only lose Wallace.....

 

If the Brown's were to sign Wallace and give that pick to us, they should turn around and dangle it in front of Cincinnati for there 17, 21 picks and maybe something else like next yrs 1st or 2nd. But could you imagine - picks 17, 21, 24. Just think what they could be lining up for the future.

 

Mike Holmgren is WAY too smart to do something this dumb.

 

i'd have to disagree with you on blackmon over wallace............... we all know that supposed can't miss prospects have missed badly before............. blackmon could be the next t.o. (talent wise), but he could easily be michael crabtree 2.0.............. stick with the proven talent whenever possible.