1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Steelers sign Ben to a new contract

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Blast Furnace, Mar 4, 2021.

  1. HeinzMustard

    HeinzMustard Well-Known Member

    10,787
    2,653
    Nov 18, 2015
    Steelers are gonna suck in '21. What a train wreck. :facepalm:
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  2. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    27,525
    6,649
    Nov 14, 2011
    You say the same thing every year :facepalm:.
     
  3. Maddog78

    Maddog78 Well-Known Member

    3,444
    748
    Oct 12, 2020
    Someone has to take over since the Paxton Lynch era ended.
     
  4. HeinzMustard

    HeinzMustard Well-Known Member

    10,787
    2,653
    Nov 18, 2015
    And every year I've been right. Steelers sucked last year from week 11 until playoff debacle.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  5. biggbunch68

    biggbunch68

    12,652
    2,163
    Apr 26, 2012

    :rolleyes::facepalm::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::lolol::lolol::lolol::lolol::lolol::lolol::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao:
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    27,525
    6,649
    Nov 14, 2011
    BS, you had them going like 7-9 last season :facepalm:.
     
  7. Thor

    Thor

    2,424
    944
    Mar 20, 2014
    Well, technically it was the contract restructure that 'saved' them money in 2021. They converted Ben's base pay (minus the $1.075m vet minimum) into prorated bonus spread over five years. Had he not taken the $5m cut to his base the Steelers would have had $1m more added to each year, so saving $14m in 2021.
     
  8. AskQuestionsLater

    AskQuestionsLater Writing Team

    21,310
    5,140
    Apr 21, 2016

    He did say "until" mind you. This is quite the development indeed.


    It showcases to all of us that @HeinzMustard is aware that not even his "Legendary Clairvoyance" is absolute and must make compromises.
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  9. Thor

    Thor

    2,424
    944
    Mar 20, 2014
    I'll hear none of this.
     
  10. AskQuestionsLater

    AskQuestionsLater Writing Team

    21,310
    5,140
    Apr 21, 2016
    I have heard too much of it! :eek:
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. HeinzMustard

    HeinzMustard Well-Known Member

    10,787
    2,653
    Nov 18, 2015
    They played like a 7-9 team from week 11 on. Actually more like 4-12 team. :facepalm:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. biggbunch68

    biggbunch68

    12,652
    2,163
    Apr 26, 2012

    Nostradamus was a hack..:cool:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  13. Seven4Steel

    Seven4Steel Well-Known Member

    1,169
    542
    Nov 28, 2020
    Actually, they weren't so great for the first 12 games either. When the fanbase (those with their eyes open) questions how we're actually winning games, then we're not that good. I'd opine that we weren't really any good after the Titans game.

    Now maybe that coincides with the loss of Bush. But I think that's giving him a little too much credit. Injuries piled up, and that really did us in. But the offense was really never in synch all season.
     
  14. HeinzMustard

    HeinzMustard Well-Known Member

    10,787
    2,653
    Nov 18, 2015
    Agree. I thought the Dallas game exposed the Steelers as a pretender. Minus the 2nd half of the Colts game, the offense fell apart from Cowboys game until the end of season.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. Thor

    Thor

    2,424
    944
    Mar 20, 2014
    I wouldn't go that far. I actually thought that they opened the season with a good dynamic mixing run, pass, and misdirection plays. IMO it was around the Tennessee/Baltimore weeks when things started to go downhill. The Ravens dominated stats across the board in the first matchup. Unfortunately for them that included turnovers as well and the Steelers escaped with the win.

    But it appeared to be against the Titans in Week 7 where the offense began to collapse, becoming increasingly one-dimensional. Rushing attempts and effectiveness both decreased dramatically, only posting 100+ team yards in a game once the rest of the way.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    41,604
    9,013
    Oct 16, 2011
    Agreed and I think at a minimum, thats what you can expect this season from Canada. Hopefully Ben buys into doing some of the other things Canada has in mind.

    Would be interesting to know why they moved away from the stuff they did early on. Popular opinion was Ben didn’t like it but there has never been any reporting on that to verify or dismiss.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    27,525
    6,649
    Nov 14, 2011
    And you had them starting the season something like 2-5 :facepalm::facepalm:.
     
  18. Seven4Steel

    Seven4Steel Well-Known Member

    1,169
    542
    Nov 28, 2020
    You're right, but I don't think the offense changed much from week 1 to week 5-6. It was the same offense. It was the same scheme. It was just more effective because our opponents weren't prepared for the Steelers to play small ball. Once they adjusted, the same Week 1 offense was exposed for what it was. Unprepared coaches trying to distract opponents from a one-dimensional offense resulting from a one-dimensional qb.
     
  19. Roonatic

    Roonatic Well-Known Member

    8,558
    1,814
    Sep 4, 2017
    No picks for Rudolph, he might see a second contract as a backup.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. Thor

    Thor

    2,424
    944
    Mar 20, 2014
    I'd agree that teams adjusted. But I'd still hold that the Steelers also adjusted, and for whatever reason thought that turtling back to rely increasingly on the short passing game was the way to go. To be fair, there were also injuries to Connor, a marked decline in o-line play, the receivers got a case of the drops, Ben purportedly injured a knee against Dallas, etc.

    But through it all the mentality seemed to be that the passing game was their Alamo. A strategy more effective when Ben was closer to 30 than 40.
     
  21. biggbunch68

    biggbunch68

    12,652
    2,163
    Apr 26, 2012
    I just saw where the Bears was interisted in Ben, before he signed his new deal.:shrug:
     
    • Like Like x 1
  22. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    41,604
    9,013
    Oct 16, 2011
    I agree, they were definitely running a different game plan to start the season. You could see that with just the ground game which evaporated then the short game became much more prominent with not as many shots down field.
     
  23. Seven4Steel

    Seven4Steel Well-Known Member

    1,169
    542
    Nov 28, 2020
    I heard that, too. They had an opening in their church men's group.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!