1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Steelers fans get ready for another year of Dan Moore Jr. as your starting LT

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by steelersrule6, Mar 30, 2024.

  1. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    22,046
    3,631
    Dec 18, 2016
    He put up great numbers against two truly horrid defenses.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Rollers

    Rollers Well-Known Member

    4,667
    1,720
    Nov 8, 2016
    He was an absolute turnover machine. over 70 turnovers all told
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    41,967
    9,191
    Oct 16, 2011
    So how come Rudolph and Pickett couldn’t put up those kind of numbers against horrid defenses.

    It’s the NFL, that kind of performance is hard no matter who you are playing.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  4. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    22,046
    3,631
    Dec 18, 2016
    No, that simply isn't true. That other quarterbacks fell is not evidence that Pickett would have fallen.

    Also, there is no evidence at all that their draft plan changed because Haskins died. That is just made-up nonsense.
     
  5. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    22,046
    3,631
    Dec 18, 2016
    Rudolph couldn't do it because he is a mediocre player. Pickett was saddled with a bad situation for two years, then got hurt before he really got to take advantage of Canada being gone. Remember also that Fields did that in his third season. We haven't seen Pickett's third season yet.

    That is my problem with Fields. He still couldn't put up numbers against good defenses three seasons into his career. More importantly, he consistently failed in the fourth quarter, which was when Pickett was at his best.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  6. mikeyg

    mikeyg Well-Known Member

    4,105
    843
    Dec 23, 2020

    be careful - you are moving into the arena of logic and reason now
     
  7. S.T.D

    S.T.D Well-Known Member

    31,667
    8,299
    Dec 23, 2020
    So what I'm seeing is people talking about tds scored, but not the turnovers at the inopportune times that actually lost the games. LoL
     
  8. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    22,046
    3,631
    Dec 18, 2016
    Yes, but it is also interesting to note that sometimes you want to focus on touchdowns while ignoring everything else, but other times you want to criticize other posters for doing the same thing.
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  9. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    14,654
    2,272
    Oct 26, 2011
    Dan Moore would qualify as a development player. How is he doing?
     
  10. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    28,487
    6,899
    Nov 14, 2011
    Chicago is where QB careers go to die, before last season Fields best WR was Mooney, Fields didn't get along with the OC they had he wasn't any good.
     
  11. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    22,046
    3,631
    Dec 18, 2016
    Last season he had a stud receiver, better than anyone the Steelers had, and a very good tight end. He still wasn't good outside of two games.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Born2Steel

    Born2Steel Well-Known Member

    1,254
    477
    Jul 7, 2023
    Not worried about Fields. Today, Russ is QB1. Fields needs to learn from Smith and Russ this season.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  13. Brice

    Brice Well-Known Member

    6,003
    1,708
    Jul 18, 2018
    If the Steelers take a RT at #20, I would not be surprised at all to see Dan Moore get traded during the draft.

    You have a late round pick in Spencer Anderson from last year, and then the Dylan Cook, a free agent they kept on the 53 man roster for the entire year last year, despite the fact that he was not active for a single game. To move a player to your practice squad you first have to waive them, and something tells me the Steelers were afraid of not getting Cook back if they released him from the 53 man roster.

    The weight I see listed everywhere is from his college playing Days 6'6 and 305 where he went from a QB to an OT in 2 years. I would love to know what his real weight is when training camp begins this year.
     
  14. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    28,438
    5,608
    Oct 22, 2011

    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=f467...ZGRlbi1nZW0td2hvLW1hZGUtdGhlLXJvc3Rlci8&ntb=1

    was 290 this says when he played at montana. put on 15 in the pros. :cool:
     
  15. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    28,487
    6,899
    Nov 14, 2011
    Better than the Steelers group of QBs, the Bears OL is trash too.
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  16. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    28,438
    5,608
    Oct 22, 2011

    well if you win games by stats but that isn't the case. i do believe that bad steelers group of qb's won 10 games. how many did fields win with better stats? who cares if we throw for 3 yards a game but win them. one stat matters.:cool:
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  17. Brice

    Brice Well-Known Member

    6,003
    1,708
    Jul 18, 2018
    From the Article: He was 290 when he was playing QB at Montana state northen. The university of Montana had him down his Junior year at 305 playing RT. I would hope he has spent some more time in the Gym and is now weighing 325+.

    LOL... I love this freshman picture.

    upload_2024-4-10_21-45-30.png
     
  18. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    28,438
    5,608
    Oct 22, 2011
    wrong again. the bears had a pretty good offensive line last year. :cool:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  19. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    28,487
    6,899
    Nov 14, 2011
    Fields first two years the Bears OL was trash, they were pretty good but gave up 44 sacks in 2023 :facepalm:.
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2024
  20. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    28,438
    5,608
    Oct 22, 2011
    many were because he couldn't read defenses. :cool:
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  21. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    28,438
    5,608
    Oct 22, 2011
    • Winner Winner x 1
  22. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    28,438
    5,608
    Oct 22, 2011
    • Winner Winner x 1
  23. Steelersfan43

    Steelersfan43 Well-Known Member

    5,397
    1,889
    Aug 10, 2016
    Sacks % for the bears QB last season

    Fields(10.6% sacks...44 sacks in 370 pass attempts)...His backup,Tyler Bagent,3.4% sacks,5 sacks on 143 pass attempts

    Fields has some potentiel but he hold the ball way too long too,so you can't blame just the bears o-line for the sacks when it was not a problem with his backup in 4 starts for him
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  24. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    22,046
    3,631
    Dec 18, 2016
    Exactly. Fields does not read defenses well and he holds the ball way too long, both of which contribute to way too sacks and turnovers.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  25. mikeyg

    mikeyg Well-Known Member

    4,105
    843
    Dec 23, 2020

    don't see much trade value / worth for him, but Khan may fish him...
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!