Should the Steelers run it back with Rodgers or not?

So were Trubisky and Fields "developed" when they arrived at Steelers? How good would Justin Fields or Mitch Trubisky be under McVey? Shanahan? Baker Mayfield seemed to "all of a sudden" miraculously play better when he was QB for Rams for only a few games. I wonder why that is? Was Mayfield "developed?"

What about Mack Jones with Shanahan? What about Daniel Jones with Steichen?

 

I could use your advice, and say I'm correct because nobody agrees with You ,but they did me, but I won't because that doesn't make something correct. Any person that believes a 12 year starting Qb was developed by a HC 12 years later is either high, or just trying to argue. The only difference between Stafford then , and now is he's on a better team. I've already said Darnold was getting better. I've stated many times on the board that I believe a player will continue to get better if he can keep himself in the NFL, until his body starts to betray him, and not only that, he was also put on a better team.
Here is an example: Did Tomlin, and Co. develop Justin Fields, or did he just play on a better team here?? Him losing his job after he left us should tell you the answer.

 

Trubisky and Field have never been developed. Neither one have ever been any good. Coaches TRIED to develop them but failed.

Mayfield played well everywhere he's been. Of course, his stats are going to be better on better run teams.

You're equating improving stats with being developed. Not the same. But I don't have a horse in this race. I just think you are mixing up "developed" and "getting the best out of".

 

Bring back Rodgers unless we can trade for Mathew Stafford.