1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Should Dick Lebeau pass the baton?

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by JackAttack 5958, Jan 4, 2015.

Should Dick LeBeau retire?

  1. YES, Dick LeBeau should retire and give someone else a shot

    44 vote(s)
    69.8%
  2. NO, Dick LeBeau should remain the Steeler DC

    19 vote(s)
    30.2%
  1. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    Just trying to take the temperature of the board regarding Dick LeBeau. Do you think it's time for DL to finally retire and pass the baton to someone else or should DL be allowed to remain the Steeler DC for life if he so chooses? What do you think and why?
     
  2. thorn058

    thorn058 Well-Known Member

    16,389
    4,300
    Oct 19, 2011
    Not sure if I would ask for him to call it but he is going to be forced to go back to the lab and reinvent everything he has established to this point just based on personnel. Just don't have the experience going forward to run the defense the way he wants. So like everyone else he has to adjust.
     
  3. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    Please exercise your constitutional right and civic duty and VOTE. :)

    I got the poll up after you posted.
     
  4. biggbunch68

    biggbunch68

    13,209
    2,265
    Apr 26, 2012
    Yes and no, .. Yes because if he don't retire soon, i'm afraid he will pass away during a season, and that would be devastating to the team, and fans..... No because i believe he is a great Def coach, and right now we really don't have the players to make his scheme work. So :shrug:
     
  5. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,022
    4,612
    Nov 4, 2011
    The one big change that I am certain I want to see is for DL to pass the torch. My eyes tell me that the offensive trends in the league are beating his scheme more and more frequently, and it seems to take too darned long for young players on our team to figure it out. We need a scheme that puts young, aggressive players in positions to be successful immediately and not have them need to be broken down and rebuilt into the image of what DL wants them to be. I've said much more on this in other recent threads, so I'll just leave it at that for now. It's time, maybe even for a 4-3.
     
  6. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    22,995
    2,158
    Oct 12, 2011
    I don't think he should be DC for life, but I don't think he should be forced to step down today either.

    Look what he was working with this year...
     
  7. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    ...and last year for that matter.
     
  8. WWW

    WWW Writing Team

    1,164
    80
    Oct 24, 2011

    ... and do you really expect a huge upgrade for next year, in order to demand results?
     
  9. bigplaywillygay

    bigplaywillygay Well-Known Member

    224
    0
    Oct 17, 2011
    Yes he needs to pass the baton, besides almost no pressure up front and terrible secondary the past ~5 years, the thing that irks me the most is 3rd and LONG (this mainly has to do with playing 15+ yards away from a receiver instead of bump and run). They never get off the field unless the QB (like Dalton) makes a terrible throw or a receiver drops it.
     
  10. WWW

    WWW Writing Team

    1,164
    80
    Oct 24, 2011
    As far as I'm aware, the two strongest arguments against LeBeau are on his scheme:
    • His scheme is out of date to today's NFL offensive schemes and officiating rules
    • The Scheme's learning curve doesn't allow an immediate impact for draft picks

    And while most people assume that changing DC will mean a change of scheme, it doesn't necessarily turn into short-term results, while it requires different personnel in some positions, and that takes time and money (free agents, draft picks).
     
  11. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    I believe if we weren't so strapped for cash we could get some "proven commodities" in FA on defense and maybe even the 0 line and we could be SB contenders instantly. The problem is that we've paid too much for people and that is really costing us. If Troy wants to stay he should take a paycut just as Ike did. I think Ben deserves a big payday but, as a fan, I would honestly love for him to take a more bargain price to try and spread that money around to the weaker elements of the team. That's easy for me to say though. I know we like to "build through the draft" and all that but our picks haven't been working out as much as they used to and while we have a franchise qb in a qb driven league it might be the most prudent thing to do to abandon that for the present to try and make one last run at it. Although we may very well have some true up and coming studs but it's certainly not looking like we've found the "next" Troy or Woodson or Harrison or even Woodley for that matter. We might have found the "next" Franco and Bettis and maybe the "next" Stallworth and Ward but on the defensive side we've got some major concerns that I don't know if a single draft is gonna be able to fix.
     
  12. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    28,761
    5,757
    Oct 22, 2011
    do you guys think if we had a different DC we could do all the things we need to upgrade these players for a successful defense? is that all we need? are our players good enough that a change at the top would be the difference? the new guy will be coaching the same players.:cool:
     
  13. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    No. I've said it's more a personnel issue and that's what I believe. It's POSSIBLE that someone could come in and make them look instantly better but that's rarely the case. Marinelli seems to have turned the Dallas d around and Harbaugh turned the 9ers d around but I really don't think those are frequent cases. It would be like saying the next guy to coach the Jets is gonna have a phenomenal offense next year. They don't have the personnel to be phenomenal. That's my opinion anyway.
     
  14. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,373
    9,386
    Oct 16, 2011
    Some good points on both sides of the argument. The defense is still behind the offense in terms of rebuilding and their last two #1 draft picks spent significant time on the bench with injuries this year. I think DL is more than capable to continue coaching, the best argument against him to retire is that it takes players too long to learn his system but we've been seeing guys get on the field quicker now.

    The Ravens game not withstanding, the defense had been playing pretty well as of late. The thing I don't understand is, why don't they bring pressure more, seems that the few games that they did that, the defense was smothering the opposition. If he stays, I'd like to see a return to Blitzburgh.
     
  15. Ray D

    Ray D Staff Member Mod Team

    10,687
    2,096
    Oct 18, 2011
    I'm fairly certain he'll outlive me if I make it to 75. (I turn 45 in a few weeks)

    The guy is very healthy and probably in better shape than the majority of us on this board. He looks great. If you passed him on the street, you'd guess he was in his early 50s, not nearing 80.

    That said, there's one thing that we cannot keep young. The brain. Sure, you can keep it active and as sharp as possible, but it goes as surely as time.

    I do not believe he is as sharp as he once was. More to the point, I don't believe he's creative as he once was. And his problem solving skills have likely deteriorated. He has lost his edge. More often than not, he appears to coach "scared." When things ARE working, he still backs off in fear of giving up a big play. Our defense doesn't appear to have the ability any longer to adapt to what the offense is trying to do. That's on him too.

    Give most coaches probowl caliber players, and they'll look good. The proof is in what they can do with average players.
     
  16. Steelsax

    Steelsax Well-Known Member

    246
    42
    Oct 25, 2011
    Great point :this!:
     
  17. freakfontana

    freakfontana

    5,445
    23
    Oct 19, 2011
    i think yes because we need a lot of fresh dbs that should see the field quickly and gain experience lebeau is afraid to do it but is the only way to find better players .. playing cam thomas instead of mauro is an aberration , since one is already know (s.diego and steelers camp) as not nfl material , we need to risk we don't need mediocrity . they seems they are already happy they won a division , and save they are asses
     
  18. WWW

    WWW Writing Team

    1,164
    80
    Oct 24, 2011
    This team misses its playmakers. And none of the players from which a huge impact was expected, performed. And I'm calling Worilds, Jarvis Jones, Mike Mitchell and Cortez Allen.
    Several of them underperformed, from the scheme point of view: you need your OLBs to be able to win one-on-one matchups, while your DBs must be able to create turnovers. Can some cap guru tell us what % of our salary cap went on these four guys, plus Woodley (who accounted for almost 8 million this year to the Steelers). This goes to the FO and to the Coaching Staff too.

    Also, defensive playcalling has lacked of creativity the last several seasons, particularly with the exotic blitzes packages (which were shown on consecutive weeks this Season against HOU, IND, BAL, but missed the rest of the way).

    There's no easy solution to our Defensive situation, while it requires a change of scheme (which has an implicit change of personnel in several positions) or an upgrade grabbing impactful free agents (which we know won't happen). Otherwise, if we're going to maintain this scheme and DL is still the DC, players drafted in 2015 will most probably see meaningful playing time and have positive impact sometime in 2016.
     
  19. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,022
    4,612
    Nov 4, 2011
    So, at the risk of being controversial, I think there is an "easy" fix - passing the torch. I mentioned the possibility of going to a 4-3 above, but that was just a "toss out" idea. I don't really think we need to make a dramatic scheme change, I think we need to tweak and simplify. Simplify responsibilities so that our athletes can make quick reads and do what they do best. I've said before, I'm not the biggest X's and O's guy in the world. I don't study every scheme to pick up every subtle detail about how DL's version of the 3-4 differs from, say, Vic Fangio's. However, when I watch our defense and many others, I see our defense being more passive in coverage and run defense. We occasionally blitz aggressively, but I can usually tell when we line up who is coming from where. It's predictable and stale IMO.

    Now, back to my toss out subject of a 4-3, I'm not sure w're as far from having the personnel to make that switch as some seem to think. I think Shazier was made to be a weak side OLB in a 4-3, chasing plays from behind like Lance Briggs in his prime. I also think McClendon would be even better lining up in gaps than head-up. There were a few times Saturday where he just killed Zuttah from a 1 technique gap position. He's pretty good at holding 2 gaps, but he's even better blowing up 1 gap. Tuitt also looks like a very good penetrator. Heyward can do it all, and could probably be very effective at LDE in a 4-3 on 1st & 2nd down, dropping inside in passing situations. JJ may ultimately be better suited as a strong side OLB in a 4-3 than his current role. Timmons becomes a 2 down inside thumper who comes off the field in the nickel. What we're missing are the outside pass rushers, but we're missing those anyway.
     
  20. jaygorius

    jaygorius Well-Known Member

    659
    18
    Nov 6, 2011
    I think the team should move on from LeBeau, however, I don't see it happening unless he chooses to step down. They can fire him outright, the players love him and I don't think it would go over well. They also can make him "retire" like they did with Ariana as they ended up looking silly after that whole fiasco. I feel like it is going to be his choice.
     
  21. snipit73

    snipit73

    1,697
    96
    Oct 23, 2011
    Nah! I'm pushin' 60 and he definitely looks older than me! So speak for yourself!:lolol:
     
  22. dinochoppers

    dinochoppers Well-Known Member

    340
    0
    Sep 11, 2014
    I like DL being there. I voted for him to stay but with that some things need to definitely change.

    I believe that there has been something going on in the locker room, with coaches and FO. If any of you remember Coach T calling DL an old white guy (during the whole "players coach" thing), it is a moment that (for someone with such a gift for talking -like Coach T) shows some dissension in the ranks.

    I'm not tying to get into whether Tomlin took the players coach thing racistly, or that Coach T is racist or any thing like that.

    My point is for someone as gifted as Coach T to make such an ignorant statement means:
    #1- He wasn't thinking
    #2- He has been hiding some disdain
    #3- Someone has pushed DL. and Tomlin together (and the 2 just aren't seeing eye to eye).

    I don't think its fair to say either of them is better or worse, they both have their ways (and they work).

    We all know Coach LeBaeu's system takes time to learn- Does that mean that our new players are dumb? No, just that it is complicated.

    We aren't asking DL to "dumb it down" anymore than we are asking the players to step it up.

    In all, I hope you understand what I am trying to say is-
    Something more is going on--and it needs to be dealt with.

    Not by just getting rid of DL.
     
  23. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,373
    9,386
    Oct 16, 2011
    Don't know if they will but I've often wondered if they are drafting with an eye towards an eventual shift. Tomlin was a 4-3 guy at Tampa, yes?
     
  24. dinochoppers

    dinochoppers Well-Known Member

    340
    0
    Sep 11, 2014
    Damn good point.
     
  25. CK 13

    CK 13 Well-Known Member

    11,412
    2,846
    Nov 5, 2011
    It's time...

    The Defense is going to be even younger next year. This does not bode well with LeBeau's teachings and scheme. Players need to get on the field sooner. Coach them up. The scheme is outdated. I appreciate all he has done, but fresh ideas with a simplified scheme I believe needs to be implemented. Butler I fear will be a carbon copy but he has stayed to take over. I would give him the nod and hope he could inject some new ideas.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!