Same Old

Crazy

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Browns are +5 in takeaways today. Since the Browns returned to the NFL, teams with a turnover margin of +5 or better in a game are 132-4-1. The Browns are responsible for two of those losses and the tie.</p>&mdash; Bill Barnwell (@billbarnwell) <a href="">September 9, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

Did the browns not turn the ball over?

 

Jesus tap dancing Christ kid. The browns had one turnover taking us from -6 to -5.

 

I want to see them replace those "BELIEVE-LAND" signs with "UNFKNBELIEVABLE-AND".

 

And lol wow 1 more turnover. Again keep trying make the numbers look significantly better. Look at what the jets just did last night to the lions. Its because darnold actually made plays. Had that been Baker and not tyrod we lose that game. Isnt hard when you have a qb who was replaced by nathan peterman and is scared to throw the ball past 10 yds.

 

In other words:

 

One more turnover makes a huge difference. Look at the winning percentage when committing 2 turnovers versus 3. With that being said we aren’t talking about 1 turnover. We are talking about 6 with a turnover differential of -5. As for your Taylor prognostication it has nothing to do with the conversation.

 

It does because your whole point was we were "lucky" to be in that game when the only reason we were lucky is because of how bad tyrod is. Not the turnovers. And one of aaron Rodgers picks in that game was essentially a punt. Wasnt like it was one that gave the seahawks great field position and put them in position to score.
Stop trying to minimize how bad tyrod is you will see what the truth about Pitt is when we play kc next week.