1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Position of need or Best Player Available?

Discussion in 'The Bill Nunn Draft Room' started by BK99, Mar 28, 2018.

  1. BK99

    BK99 Well-Known Member

    822
    42
    Oct 25, 2011
    Like a lot of fans I've been wanting the Steelers to go and get a CB in the 1st rd for years. And I've been disappointed for years as they seem to go with best player no matter what the position but now I'm having second thoughts.

    Anyway, Burns and Dupree were both considered a reach but they were probably looked at as the best at position when the Steelers were on the clock. I'm looking at how those guys are developing and I'm now hoping the team looks at BPA rather than need even though safety, LBer, and DL are needed badly.

    I'd like to hear what you guys think, should they go BPA even if it is on the offensive side? Do we go after a need even if there are better players at other positions available? I'm interested in how others are looking at the draft.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Mr.HammerZz

    Mr.HammerZz Well-Known Member

    131
    18
    Mar 13, 2018
    Mason Rudolph is the pick I think tbh, and here's why. The dinner and meetings with Guice is a play to check Bell and also to keep other teams on their toes. They filled the glaring needs on D with decent veterans now they'll look to fill the depth with 4-7 rounds on D. This draft is deep with talent on that side of the ball. They quietly met with Rudolph before and after his pro day. He's quite like BEN in many ways both physically and on the field. Ben said he wants to play at least 3 more years which gives the Steelers enough time to red shirt and groom the next franchise QB. (Dobbs or Landry ain't it.) This kid is an unbelievable competitor and will be a monster if given the time to mature. So yeah I think they throw a curve ball this year and draft a QB RD 1. I'll also add that he is the biggest sleeper of the qbs in this draft, go watch some tape on him. ;)
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
  3. SteelCity_NB

    SteelCity_NB Staff Member Mod Team

    5,418
    684
    Oct 23, 2011
    Before the Burnett and Bostic signing I would have said S and ILB needed to be high priority.

    I think Burnett has stabilized the S position. Burnett is a legitimate starter.

    Bostic had a nice year last season but is he a legitimate starter? I don't know.

    I still think ILB is a high priority, round 1 or 2.

    But with our 2 signings, I think it has freed us up to go BPA.

    I think if Mason Rudolph is available at #28, I think he is a legitimate possibility, as is RB or ILB.
     
  4. TarheelFlyer

    TarheelFlyer Well-Known Member

    2,129
    56
    Oct 25, 2011
    I don't think the Steelers typically do either BPA or position of need. It is a blend. They take the BPA at a position of need. If I can get the time, I will go through the roster and we can get a good list together of where the holes are on the current roster. That is really the only way to do this.

    For instance, let's look at WR. They basically have 3 or 4 guys on the roster. Right now DHB would be your #4. He is a special teamer only by now in his career. We may bring back Rogers, but who knows what he will be like after the injury. So, here is a position I think we have a need at, but we don't have a high need. If you take a guy #1 at WR, where does he play? You have Brown, Bryant, and Smith-Schuster already in your lineup. We need to target a guy in say round 5 and then some UDFA and see what we can stir up.

    S and ILB have had their starter holes filled, we basically have zero holes when it comes to starting positions on the roster, but we have basically zero depth at both of these positions. You want to play Dangerfield or Dirty Red as starters all year? Yeah, me neither. I will do the whole roster as soon as I can get some time.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. AskQuestionsLater

    AskQuestionsLater Writing Team

    21,307
    5,140
    Apr 21, 2016
    Under most circumstances, Round One is need and every other round is BPA.


    This year could be different considering how deep this draft is. Realistically, it can go either way.



    One thing is for certain; trades will be en masse in Round One without question.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    14,374
    2,196
    Oct 26, 2011
    If you have listened to KC for the past 10 years the Steelers always draft BPA LOL. I could actually believe him this year.
     
  7. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    27,525
    6,649
    Nov 14, 2011
    I hope they draft either safety or ILB, we need depth on defense more than anything else.
     
  8. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    27,859
    5,347
    Oct 22, 2011
    I don't think there is a question it has to be LB. Vince and matakevich are backups, bostic helps strengthen that spot and could start at one of the two spots, but we do still need another starter at that position. OLB is also a position of need. Moats and harrison gone and chickillo year to year. Then there is Dupree, if they are still trying to decide on him and his 5th year option then a new player is in the mix. We have two starters at safety now. RB, OLB, ILB are all in play I would say. Hubbard? Carter? LVE? Guice? Lewis? Evans I hate to say? Landry? Chubb? Jefferson? These all seem like guys to watch for.:cool:
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2018
  9. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    27,859
    5,347
    Oct 22, 2011
    Two guys I'm keeping an eye on are Lorenzo Carter and Leon Jacobs. Great speed. Long arms. Jacobs is pretty strong even with the long arms and both could play inside or outside in our defense. That gives us position flexibility from both of them. I think Jacobs was a little out of position at OLB for Wisconsin and would fit much better inside here. Carter brings that length that helps on STs too. He can block kicks as he has proven. Jacobs isn't a 1st rounder but he is moving up. You can't deny his speed and strength numbers, add long arms and ability to play inside and out. He has starts at both in a defense similar to ours. :cool:
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    14,374
    2,196
    Oct 26, 2011
    With the signing of Burnett, and maybe Tom Bradley can coach these secondary players up?

    I now see Harold Landry/Jaire Alexander in play for Steelers at BPA.
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2018
  11. TarheelFlyer

    TarheelFlyer Well-Known Member

    2,129
    56
    Oct 25, 2011
    Ironically, Landry is one player I do not want.
     
  12. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    14,374
    2,196
    Oct 26, 2011
    Why, all he does is PRODUCE against high quality talent.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    27,525
    6,649
    Nov 14, 2011
    He was great in 2016, I think he led the NCAA in sacks. He was injured in 2017 and didn't produce the same stats.
     
  14. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    27,859
    5,347
    Oct 22, 2011
    He's put up quality numbers at the combine.:cool:
     
  15. TarheelFlyer

    TarheelFlyer Well-Known Member

    2,129
    56
    Oct 25, 2011
    Sorry guys. My head must not have been screwed on right. I was thinking about the OLB from GA. Him I don't like.
     
  16. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    14,374
    2,196
    Oct 26, 2011
    hey don't feel bad, I have had maybe too many Birthdays. Transpose numbers forget names
     
  17. AskQuestionsLater

    AskQuestionsLater Writing Team

    21,307
    5,140
    Apr 21, 2016
    Lorenzo Carter or Justin Reid as I see it currently for us. Not too sure even if teams who are desperate for Linebackers are sympathetic about something as a 40 time as others are in the top 20.


    Unless Mike Vrabel, Marvin Lewis or even Jason Garrett have other needs, I believe Pittsburgh's chances obtaining Leighton Vander Esch is likely not going to happen now.



    Oddly enough though, if I had a choice??... Justin Reid. Morgan Burrett does allow us to run the dime defense but having J.J. Wilcox as a primary option scares me. Reid being that primary option as a starting safety is a much better proposition assuming Sean Davis moves to Free Safety.



    Should Sean Davis stay at Strong Safety then Jessie Bates is the next best option.
     
  18. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    27,859
    5,347
    Oct 22, 2011
    Brian Allen or sutton with Burnett and Davis would let us run the dime well. Hilton, burns, haden. Sensabaugh, Wilcox. I'm leaning more towards a bigger SS with speed. Edmund's, flowers. Maybe a true FS later on. Maybe they are leaning towards a big fast CB that can tackle well. Many choices. Allen and sutton though I feel will get a shot instead of leaving them grow dormant on the depth chart. :cool:
     
  19. Ender

    Ender

    7,120
    986
    Apr 5, 2014
    I hope we don't draft a QB in the first.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. NY STEELERFAN

    NY STEELERFAN Well-Known Member

    8,604
    1,333
    Dec 10, 2012
    I guess it all depends on what people consider positions of need. Even though we signed Burnett and Bostic I would still consider both positions of need. I also put RB up there with what we are going thru with Bell and oline has to be in consideration. I think we go BPA of position of need which I feel could be ILB, OLB, oline, RB, S and even WR although with our record at WR I am not looking for one in the first. I also look at the depth in this draft class and I see S as a very deep class and OLB not so deep so if a guy like Carter is there I would consider him.
     
  21. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    27,859
    5,347
    Oct 22, 2011
    I do think they like Malik golden. We will see if he expands on the pretty good preseason he had last year. LB with speed is a must. Probably two would be better. We shall see but we have some options already here many are not giving a chance yet. Just to pick someone different for the sake of change isn't always a smart way to go. I want to see what some of these guys can do before we just make a pick because many think they will be better because they are new. I want to see keion Adams, Brian Allen, Sutton, huguenin, golden. We may not need more. :cool:
     
  22. NY STEELERFAN

    NY STEELERFAN Well-Known Member

    8,604
    1,333
    Dec 10, 2012
    The big question is do we have the time for that, the Ben clock is going tick tock tick tock. What if we ignore say OLB in the draft and FA and give Adams a shot at backing up and we lose a starter like last year? Then we have to worry about if he can dandle it no thank you, I am all about seeing what he can do but with us being so close I want plan c in place as well. IMO we don't have the time to hope guys on the practice squad can fill in when needed. I do not want to see another replay of the ILB position from last year and before anyone says well injury was the problem yeah it was but not having players in place for the "next man up" was the real problem. jmo
     
  23. coldrolled

    coldrolled Well-Known Member

    484
    46
    Dec 1, 2014
    The Pats picked up 23.. they need QB, ILB So if the ILB's are gone before 23.. Mason Rudolph may not be an issue for us to deal with he could be a Pat.
     
  24. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    27,859
    5,347
    Oct 22, 2011
    I don't think Colbert is in a panic as some fans are of we have to win before Ben goes and foresake the future to do that. He did draft these guys, like Adams and Allen and sutton. He did bring back golden for another shot as he did huguenin. We kept guys that showed up last year early and now they have a year under their belts of learning.

    Whomever they draft this year will help us win in some respect. It is an on going saga. We have never thrown away the future to win now or we would be bringing in more FAs like some of these other teams try to do. :cool:
     
  25. NY STEELERFAN

    NY STEELERFAN Well-Known Member

    8,604
    1,333
    Dec 10, 2012
    I am not talking about throwing away the future on FA's I am talking about throwing away the future because we don't have players ready, for example Moats. I am also not talking about Sutton cause he payed last year, I am more worried about guys like Adams and Allen being counted on as sterters is needed and I am not ready for that. I am fine with them being on the roster for depth but no way do I think a guy can come in this year from the practice squad and end up being starter material. If that was the case the Steelers would have moved Kelsey up from the PS to help us last season when we were so bad at ILB. I agree we need these guys (Adams and Allen) but just for depth and I am hoping we draft others for this spot as well.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!