1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Officiating

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by steel_d_curtain, Jan 4, 2015.

  1. Ray D

    Ray D Staff Member Mod Team

    11,049
    2,297
    Oct 18, 2011
    Knee being down means nothing if he wasn't touched. He can get back up or even crawl. Play isn't dead.

    That said, he was touched. It was bang bang, but he was touched as he caught the ball.
     
  2. Ender

    Ender

    7,837
    1,124
    Apr 5, 2014
    In the pros you have to be touched down and I don't think he was. You can crawl into the endzone as long as you aren't touched. I believe that is what we are referring to.
     
  3. gpguy

    gpguy Well-Known Member

    3,481
    21
    Dec 19, 2011
    Yes it does. In the NFL you have to be TOUCHED to be considered down, knee down or not.

    Anyways...the only person I think could have contacted him, was the guy to Browns right...might have touched him on the helmet.
     
  4. sjromano

    sjromano Well-Known Member

    1,763
    183
    Nov 3, 2011
    Got it... and I understand the point of the post is that the officiating was horrible.

    Either way, it was irrelevant, we scored on the next play. But I get it...
     
  5. gpguy

    gpguy Well-Known Member

    3,481
    21
    Dec 19, 2011
    Anyways...while the officials were not the best. The did had its worst day when it comes to getting penalized in a good while. That was a huge difference, especially when most of them are dumb personal fouls. While they factored in to the game outcome...still they had chances to win the game (settling for only FGs compared to TDs, etc), and they didn't do it. The end!
     
  6. Lizard72

    Lizard72

    21,856
    1,842
    Oct 23, 2011
    Just had a look at the Torrey Smith vs. Antwon Blake PI call. Total BS! He wasn't even trying to get to the ball! He clearly planted to get contact and then grabbed Blake! Blake has to have a better ball sense and if he just gets his head around then he's good, but come on! How do you not see what could be considered a flop? That's as much a flop as a punter flailing after he gets tapped.
     
  7. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    You might be right, but it really doesn't matter. You can't do what Blake did. If Blake had just turned his head and made a play for the ball, he could have ran over Smith and it wouldn't have mattered. You can't run into the WR without at least looking at the ball, it will get called every single time.
     
  8. Lizard72

    Lizard72

    21,856
    1,842
    Oct 23, 2011
    Unless....you're the Cowboys. :roflmao:

    Seriously, though if a receiver initiates contact for the sole purpose of drawing a penalty that has to factor in...
     
  9. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    No it doesn't, not if the WR appears to be trying to come back to the ball and the DB is running through him. Doesn't matter if the WR bearhugs the DB, as long as the DB is going through him and not looking back, it's going to get called. I just don't get how a professional corner can't get his head around to look for the ball. Maybe we should start drafting WR's to be our CB's
     
  10. Diamond

    Diamond Well-Known Member

    5,790
    469
    May 26, 2012
    That's exactly what happened in the dallas game when the refs picked the flag up, does interference only apply in certain games? I'm really tired of the poor officiating that seems to be getting worse each year, i'm sure there will be more of this low quality inconsistent officiating this week in the division round....
     
  11. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    It's no better in any other sport.
     
  12. Diamond

    Diamond Well-Known Member

    5,790
    469
    May 26, 2012

    But it can be better, for example before the refs can pick a flag up after a penalty is called there should be a replay review, or like Belichick proposed coach's should be able to challenge a foul called on the field for review.........
     
  13. Thigpen82

    Thigpen82 Bitter optimist

    10,523
    1,534
    Oct 17, 2011
    Expanding the number of calls that are reviewable would be a good move, imo. I'm not sure I buy the arguments that this shouldn't take place. A coach should be able to challenge the result of any play, whether there was a call or not. Same rules as before - only 2 challenges, lose a timeout, etc. - but not restrict what's challengeable or not.
     
  14. thesteeldeal

    thesteeldeal Well-Known Member

    13,841
    1,898
    Oct 18, 2011
    It's absolutely coached and intentional that's why it needed to be called. They also practice having their receivers come back and sell PI on under thrown balls. That actually is a tactic that we need to practice and get better at. I can think of a bunch of times this year where our guys could have easily drawn a flag if they came back to the ball a little. The officiating may not have directly cost us the game but it was extremely one sided and definitely didn't help our cause.
     
  15. Wreck

    Wreck Well-Known Member

    392
    12
    Oct 19, 2011
    AB went up for the ball, caught it, was hit mid air by a defender, and came down on his knees. That was contact by the defender that brought him down. He didn't need to have someone else run up and touch his pads while he was on his knees. The contact was already made.

    If he had gone up and caught the ball with no contact, and fallen to his knees, he could have crawled or got up and run.
     
  16. Busman

    Busman

    7,832
    1,077
    Oct 18, 2011

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!