1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Noll vs. Bellicheat

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Da Stellars, Feb 3, 2012.

  1. Da Stellars

    Da Stellars Well-Known Member

    7,874
    972
    Oct 22, 2011
    If Bellicheat gets 4 SB's is he a better coach than Noll all time? Will he at least be Noll's equal?
     
  2. diehardsteel

    diehardsteel Well-Known Member

    1,049
    0
    Oct 19, 2011
    Noll won 4 super bowls in 6 years and never lost one. He's got my vote as #1. :bowdown:
     
  3. 4EvrH8O'donnel

    4EvrH8O'donnel Well-Known Member

    920
    0
    Nov 18, 2011
    SPYGATE discredits most of everything that Belicheat has accomplished.
     
  4. diehardsteel

    diehardsteel Well-Known Member

    1,049
    0
    Oct 19, 2011
    yeah, that too. Noll = #1
     
  5. TarheelFlyer

    TarheelFlyer Well-Known Member

    2,129
    56
    Oct 25, 2011
    Living in Charlotte, I find it incredible to listen to people try to talk with authority about this issue. Personally I put Lombardi at #1, Noll at #2, Paul Brown at #3.

    Walsh
    Gibbs
    Belicheat
    Parcells
    Shula
    Halas
    Landry

    These guys all make top 10. Where? Not sure, but it is a REALLY hard list to do.
     
  6. aces4me

    aces4me Well-Known Member

    268
    13
    Jan 2, 2012
    It is impossible to compare pre-salary cap to salary cap coaches. Completely different set of circumstances to deal with.
     
  7. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    10,944
    808
    Oct 16, 2011
    He's definitely up there. I don't know about #1 though. Not sure I would take Noll either. I unfortunately didn't really get to see much of Noll's coaching, and what I did see were some of the not so great years for the Steelers. I have spent a ton of time reading about the history of the NFL, including past coaches and players. Noll is top 10 for sure, probably top 5. Bellichek likely is too, especially considering that he's not done yet and could very well add a few more SB's to his resume.

    It's hard to ignore Walsh and Lombardi as 1 and 2. After all, if it wasn't for Lombardi, the Green Bay Packers may not even exist today. The only issue I have with putting Lombardi as the clear #1, is that he mostly coached in a different era when there wasn't nearly the same amount of competition. It's far easier to win the championship with far lesser teams in the league. There is absolutely no denying his record though. Everywhere he went he was a winner.
     
  8. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    10,944
    808
    Oct 16, 2011
    I disagree. I hear this a lot about players. ie. "You can't compare QB's of the 70's with today's QB's because the rules are so different." I think you can absolutely compare. Regardless of the rules or the salary cap, you work with what you have available. If you have a ton of money available, then you are competing against every other coach who also has a ton of money. If you don't have money to spend, well then neither does any other coach. It's what you can do with what you have that counts.
     
  9. colsteveaustin

    colsteveaustin Well-Known Member

    582
    0
    Oct 17, 2011

    Agree.Also Noll won 4 Super Bowls in 6 years.He never lost one. So,I feel Noll is better.




    Oh,I almost forgot.....Noll never cheated. :hehehe:
     
  10. aces4me

    aces4me Well-Known Member

    268
    13
    Jan 2, 2012
    Feel free to disagree but you are wrong. Being able to keep any player you want ( a lot of those coached were pre free agency) means never having to let go a of your 3rd or 4th starting quality OG or OT because you have to have the money for another position. The salary cap makes every personnel decision a triage case.
     
  11. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    10,944
    808
    Oct 16, 2011
    I'm wrong? I didn't know opinions could be wrong. Anyway, my point still stands, Lombardi isn't competing against Belichek even though they're being compared, Lombardi was competing against every other coach in the league, all of which were operating under the same rules. Lombardi had advantages due to their being no free agency, but so did every other coach in his time, yet he bested all of them. Belichek has to compete against other coaches who try to steal his players, but at the same time, he can steal other teams players via free agency.

    You don't have to compare the systems in place, you just compare the results they achieved against every other coach at the time who had to operate under the same rules. Not every coach in the 70's was successful, despite being able to keep all their players.
     
  12. BobbyBiz

    BobbyBiz Well-Known Member

    6,796
    812
    Nov 30, 2011
    You know youre safe saying that on this board. But taking it elsewhere is asking for punishment.
     
  13. BobbyBiz

    BobbyBiz Well-Known Member

    6,796
    812
    Nov 30, 2011
    You are wrong.

    Free agency and expansion have changed the game dramatically. Talent is thinner and players are more mobile. Rosters less stable. And thats not even considering the enormity of the egos of todays players given footballs exalted status in our society.

    Much harder now.
     
  14. mdbates2

    mdbates2 Well-Known Member

    1,359
    1
    Nov 3, 2011
    Disagree to an extent. The old phrase is "Familiarity breeds contempt. Noll somehow found a way to contain quite a few egos over a long period of time. No one ever got beyond the idea that the team was more important than the individual. Think about it. When did you ever see Jack Lambert or Joe Green do a "sack dance"? The closest you got to hot-dogging was Swann and Stallworth and their little hand-slap routine. When Harris would score a touchdown, he would just flip the ball to the official like he was ready for the next play.

    Noll always considered himself to be a teacher more than a coach, and he did a better job than anyone I've ever seen at keeping the best team in the NFL learning new technique and new ways to remain dominant over those 6 years. Even though they only won 4 Super Bowls in those years, they were the best team in the NFL for those years - except maybe the injury year.

    I'm not saying that Belicheck doesn't do a good job, but I really think that it is more difficult to do it repeatedly with the same group.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!