Kyle Fuller

I have been thinking that if Dennard, Evans and Ebron are off the board when we pick - we could trade back if possible into the mid-20s and pick up Kyle Fuller. However, I was listening to NFL Radio this morning and heard several NFL scouts think Fuller may be the first corner off the Board - would love to hear thoughts on taking him at 15.

 

I've never had a problem with it. he or roby.

 

I agree and I have him ahead of Dennard esp. in a zone scheme ..

 

I am a huge VT fan and Fuller is a game changer; if Gilbert is off the board I would love him at 15.

 

FWIW...Mayock is a big fan too.

 

I would be happy with Fuller OR Roby over Dennard......but not if Evans or Gilbert or Ebron are still available...

 

I don't know it seems too high for Fuller, I haven't seen it anywhere that he's projected to go that high.

 

I'd be cool with Fuller. He seems to have the skill set to be productive in the league. I guess it just depends on the teams in front of us, and what they think of him. He could be the first CB taken or the fourth... I have a weird feeling that either Dennard or Gilbert will be available at 15, and I wouldn't draft Fuller over either of those guys.

 

I think after the top group, anyone is really an option if we end up staying at 15.

You have the 4 QBs.
You have Clowney and Mack.
You have Gilbert and Dennard.
You have Evans and Watkins.
You have the 3 O Tackles.

After that it is anyone's guess.

I have Gilbert, Dennard, and then Fuller.

I have Watkins, Evans, and then Benjamin.

There is so much movement right now as I think other than Clowney, Watkins and Mack, NO ONE agrees who the best 60 players are or when they should be drafted.

 

I'm not real worried about pick 15 or 46, it's who's left after that long wait until the 3rd round comp pick. I'd have to say we go one offense and one defense 1-2, but at which spot is most needed. wr,cb,de. which two positions get those first two picks.

 

When you have a franchise QB and one WR who had more than 40 catches last year which do you think?

 

would be nice trade down in the first to add an early third

 

when you lose 3 DE's in one off season and you have 3 cb's that haven't shown enough to be a #1 going forward, I guess it's not that cut and dry.

 

We have plenty of needs for the draft...plenty. IMO, the guy we take #1 needs to be the one who will have the largest impact on our team in the coming year. Other picks can develop over time, but we need an impact player. WR is the most likely position for this to happen at IMO. That may not be our best long-term strategy though. If we can get a WR who can help us this year in round #2, you could take a larger impact player for the long-term in round 1. We like to say rookies don't play here, but Bell, Williams, and Jones all got significant minutes last year.

 

The first 2 picks needs to be either CB, WR or WR, CB. DE with the Steelers takes too long to get on the field and make a impact.

 

when was the last time a cb started as a rookie?

 

when was last time we took a cb in first round ?

couple the two things and i'm not so sure they are thinking to take a cb in first round ...

 

When was the last time they drafted a CB in the first two rounds from a major school top tier talent. I don't think if they draft a CB this year he has to start right away, but he needs to a part of the rotation and get some playing time. That crap with Keenan Lewis where he sat for 3 years and then starts in his contract year doesn't work anymore.

 

is still think they are working as much as possible to find a partner to trade down , i would call cleveland ..

 

to be honest lewis didn't show he was ready to play before that either.

our defense worked because of LB'ers and D-line getting pressure, so we didn't really need a top pick cb for many years. our LB'ers were always the strength of the defense. now we are lacking up front and at LB and in the secondary. I wouldn't be surprised at any pick at any level of the defense.