1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Kazee hit discussion

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by 86WardsWay, Dec 16, 2023.

  1. 86WardsWay

    86WardsWay Well-Known Member

    17,008
    4,902
    Dec 27, 2012
    After further review it may have been clean. Brutal but clean. No?
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
  2. Da Stellars

    Da Stellars Well-Known Member

    8,127
    1,063
    Oct 22, 2011
    I didn’t see it, but Billy and Wolf said he was going for the ball.

    I wasn’t even aware NFL put the college targeting rule in? Shouldn’t it have been a flag for first offense?
     
  3. TuRnDoWnForWaTT

    TuRnDoWnForWaTT Well-Known Member

    8,155
    3,186
    Jan 1, 2018
    I feel the same way about it. It was worthy of a penalty but not an ejection.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. Ray D

    Ray D Staff Member Mod Team

    10,696
    2,096
    Oct 18, 2011
    He's getting fined and probably suspended either way. He launched. Doesn't even matter that he didn't actually lead with his helmet. He launched at his head.

    Bang bang and couldn't be avoided? Maybe. But it won't matter.
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 2
  5. Arch Stanton

    Arch Stanton Well-Known Member

    1,616
    317
    Oct 10, 2022
    It was a clean hit. The penalty was a joke, and getting ejected was an even bigger joke
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  6. Steel the Win on Sunday

    Steel the Win on Sunday Well-Known Member

    369
    148
    Jan 7, 2016
    Clean hit. Bang bang play. Receiver basically dove into a low stroke zone hit.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. DSteelerCT

    DSteelerCT Well-Known Member

    4,220
    193
    Nov 15, 2011
    Ejection was big time overreaction
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  8. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,374
    9,388
    Oct 16, 2011
    The rules have made it impossible to play defense. A defenders job is to break up passes and he did that but because of the launching rule it is an illegal hit.

    So basically the only thing Kazee could do on that play because of how the rules are drawn up is allow Pittman to make the catch and just touch him to make sure he is down.

    Ruining. The. Game.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  9. RobertoC#21

    RobertoC#21 Well-Known Member

    583
    176
    Nov 24, 2011
    The defender has to be able to make as play on the ball or the receiver! If the receiver dives for a ball, then he is basically eliminating himself from protection and should be allowed to be hit, the defender should not have to allow the receiver a free path to the ball!! I call this a very bad call and it was clean, ejection should have never been an option!!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. JAD

    JAD Well-Known Member

    3,275
    361
    Jan 2, 2012
    Penalty okay, but not ejection.
     
  11. Jammasterc

    Jammasterc Well-Known Member

    14,892
    1,307
    Oct 26, 2011
    Receiver was airborne head first.

    Contact was unavoidable.
     
  12. Wolfepack88

    Wolfepack88 Well-Known Member

    3,907
    794
    Oct 16, 2022
    Yeah the only other option is just to let him catch it now if you cant get to the ball before the receiver, that's it. Any hard "Ryan Clark" hit is immediate flag and fine, etc!!!
     
  13. Voice of Reason

    Voice of Reason Well-Known Member

    459
    129
    Jan 7, 2019
    The NFL has taken this to a new level of softness.

    Receiver laid out for the ball - safety also heading full speed. Bang - bang play.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  14. jeh1856

    jeh1856 Just chilling

    29,045
    10,740
    Oct 26, 2011
    I was watching a post game local pittsburgh show with a clear still shot and it looks hard but clean he did not use his helmet and he was low

    Cris Hoke said if they had reviewed it they would of canceled the penalty
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. woofermazing

    woofermazing Guest

    Nah, he lowered his head, wasn't close to playing the ball.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. SteelerNole

    SteelerNole Well-Known Member

    1,390
    298
    Nov 24, 2019
    It’s not even football anymore. So many of the 70’s Steelers would be ejected every week.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. doubleyoi

    doubleyoi

    6,676
    1,415
    Apr 26, 2012
    No you cannot have forcible contact to the head on a defenseless WR
     
  18. The Sodfather

    The Sodfather Well-Known Member

    15,780
    3,241
    Nov 17, 2014
    These plays need to be reviewable. So does roughing the QB calls. It was a hard hit. Kazee lowered his head to hit with his shoulder. You hate the penalty call, but the ejection was a knee-jerk overreaction.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. Voice of Reason

    Voice of Reason Well-Known Member

    459
    129
    Jan 7, 2019
    The penalty is fair, but the quick ejection…..
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. Formerscribe

    Formerscribe Well-Known Member

    23,478
    3,907
    Dec 18, 2016
    And if the league has fined him and possibly suspended him later, maybe that was the right call. There is no targeting call in the NFL. No way in hell that warranted an ejection. The officiating crew screwed the Steelers royally tonight.
     
  21. ljkjr74

    ljkjr74 Well-Known Member

    479
    136
    May 7, 2015
    Tag football anyone. Just sayin
     
  22. biggbunch68

    biggbunch68

    13,218
    2,268
    Apr 26, 2012
    His feet are still touching the ground how is that launching?. I thought launching was when you left your feet and dove at the other player?.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  23. mikeyg

    mikeyg Well-Known Member

    4,728
    1,064
    Dec 23, 2020

    this

    it is the NEW NFL, like it or not. easy call I think.
     
  24. SteelReal

    SteelReal Well-Known Member

    1,708
    303
    Oct 1, 2020
    I thought initially they were both diving for the ball at the same time. Upon replay i did see Pittman definitely had it in his grasp before Kazee went for the hit. I think he was trying to separate Pittman from the ball but unfortunately Pittman had it grasped up close to his helmet and the hit looked a lot worse then what it really was. I didn't agree with the ejection either and it was a bit knee jerk.
     
  25. Ray D

    Ray D Staff Member Mod Team

    10,696
    2,096
    Oct 18, 2011
    I don't disagree. I'm not even sure it warranted a flag.

    I'm just saying that is what will happen. Welcome to Goodell's NFL
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!