1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

"Jarvis Jones Disappoints at Pro Day" -- Good News?

Discussion in 'The Bill Nunn Draft Room' started by HugeSnack, Mar 21, 2013.

  1. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,233
    100
    Oct 17, 2011
    "Jarvis Jones Disappoints at Pro Day"
    "Jarvis Jones Not Doing Himself Any Favors"
    "Jarvis Jones Has Lackluster Pro Day"

    In the mocks this guy has been fluttering between #2 and #20 over the last couple of months, bouncing up and down due to health concerns, and now, a "lackluster" pro day.

    To me, out of all the pass rushers in this draft, Jones is the only one I feel comfortable taking. I think the others have too much bust potential, especially Mingo. And they aren't as NFL ready. Personally, I want to roll the dice with Worilds, but considering this is the final year of his contract, it's easy to imagine that he won't be with us next year no matter what he does in 2013. So for that reason alone I'm okay with an OLB, as long as it won't bust. I've been hoping Jones would slide so that he'd at least be an option for us. For awhile that seemed probable, and then impossible. I'm hoping this does the trick.

    The details on his pro day... a 4.92 40-yard dash, 20 bench reps, and a possible tweaked hamstring. That's exactly the kind of thing that scares away the stupid teams. I think Jerry Rice ran a 4.68 or so, and he was a 4.4 guy. Jones is clearly fast on tape, and strong. My gut tells me he still won't make it out of the top 10, but my gut told me the Bengals would take David DeCastro over Kevin Zeitler, so what does my gut know. Hopefully I'm wrong again.

    Mike Tomlin was in attendance.
     
  2. steel1031

    steel1031 Well-Known Member

    3,825
    239
    Oct 16, 2011
    that is good for us. i bet he falls to us now. i would not hesitate to pick him. jones, unlike teo who also ran slow, is great on tape
     
  3. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    22,613
    1,983
    Oct 12, 2011
    I'm sure it'll affect his stock, but I'd still be (pleasantly) surprised if he fell to us.
     
  4. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,233
    100
    Oct 17, 2011
    Just curious, TTF, where would you like to see us go in round 1, ideally?
     
  5. numbah58

    numbah58 Staff Member Mod Team

    1,856
    29
    Oct 16, 2011
    I love what he does as a player. He's a plug and play 3-4 edge rusher. He's not going to excel in coverage and some people (not me) value that aspect highly..I do worry about his condition though. There's documented history of it and I'd be surprised if he plays into his 30's.. That being said, if we could get two contracts out of him it's worth the 17th pick, IMO.
     
  6. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    27,859
    5,347
    Oct 22, 2011
    brandon jenkins didn't wow them either at his pro day. he ran in the 4.9 range too. maybe the foot isn't healed yet.

    i see the steelers interested in the 6-2 250lb OLB types. lemonier,stansly maponga, jarvis jones instead of the bigger pass rushers. trouble is these guys are not big in number in the draft.

    DLB said he wants a safety early. i still think they go that way.

    i'm still leaning towards washington from georgia as the pass rushing OLB i want.:cool:
     
  7. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,233
    100
    Oct 17, 2011
    These days it's hard to get 2 or 3 contracts out of a guy no matter how good and healthy he is. :(

    He doesn't need to be a stud in coverage, he just needs to be athletic and not an idiot. I think he passes that test.
     
  8. numbah58

    numbah58 Staff Member Mod Team

    1,856
    29
    Oct 16, 2011
    I agree.If he can backpedal and has some lateral agility, which I think he can and does, he'll be fine. He should get a 2nd contract one year before his rookie deal expires if he impresses. So while I agree the third contract will be very iffy, I think a good 1st rounder gets a second contract. He's a good player, I'd be happy with it.
     
  9. biggbunch68

    biggbunch68

    12,653
    2,163
    Apr 26, 2012
    :offtopic: If the Steelers dont go WR in the first they will go S
     
  10. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,233
    100
    Oct 17, 2011
    I think there's a really good chance that there will not be appropriate value for either of those positions when we pick. And they're not about to reach.
     
  11. steel1031

    steel1031 Well-Known Member

    3,825
    239
    Oct 16, 2011
    there is talk about us being interested in dumervil. do we still take jones at 1 if we sign him?
     
  12. biggbunch68

    biggbunch68

    12,653
    2,163
    Apr 26, 2012
    Agreed, ....but just like we moved up to get Troy, i think we will move back to get either one of these positions..
     
  13. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    27,859
    5,347
    Oct 22, 2011
    DLB said he wants a safety early. do you pick the 1st or 2nd best safety or wr, or the 3rd,or 4th or later OLB? it just depends who the first 16 take. if you wait until pick 48, we could end up with missing someone else then. i wouldn't rule vaccaro or elam out at 17 or woods or hunter, or jarvis jones for that matter. it depends how the team values these guys not the draft boards. is it a reach if he starts for the next 10 years? a good safety would be a very solid pick this year to solidify the defensive backfield this year. heck i wouldn't rule out a CB this year if the plan is too replace ike by next year either.

    :cool:
     
  14. numbah58

    numbah58 Staff Member Mod Team

    1,856
    29
    Oct 16, 2011
    I'd take the 3rd or 4th best OLB if all of those players are better than the best Safety.. It depends on which position is more talented at the front end. However, I do agree that we need players at multiple positions. We could go in alot of different directions in the 1st, maybe even NT?
     
  15. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,477
    Oct 18, 2011
    If we're comfortable with his health, I'd be happy if the Steelers drafted him at 17. I still don't think he'll make it to us though.
     
  16. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,233
    100
    Oct 17, 2011
    That's my dark horse position. They could take one at #17 or trade back and take one. You're right, even if they tie up Cortez long term, so far we can't count on Curtis Brown, and we all know what Gay offers. We'll need another one assuming Ike is forced out soon. The safeties, I'm not so sure. Maybe Vaccaro at #17, but he could be gone, and I don't see trading up for him. You can't trade back for him because he won't make it. If you trade back for one of the others, will they provide value at our new spot? Most don't have them carrying a 1st round grade, so could still be a reach. Seems like things have to fall just right for us to land a safety in the first.
     
  17. mort159

    mort159 Well-Known Member

    190
    0
    Nov 14, 2011
    If he is there at #17 and we don't take him it will be very disappointing. He is the best FOOTBALL PLAYER in this draft. Everything else outside of football (spinal stenosis diagnosis, 40 times, bad drills, ect...) dragged his stock down. All i know is he dominated in the SEC and to do that you must be a great player.

    Although, I could see us passing on him and trying to get a later round devleopment OLB and going with Worilds for now.
     
  18. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    27,859
    5,347
    Oct 22, 2011
    i'd rule out QB,DE,RB,OT,C,ILB,OG,NT,TE,FB in the 1st.

    QB, well just not going to happen.
    DE, we have drafted the last two in the 1st.
    RB, i don't think there's one in the draft good enough for a 1st round grade.
    OT, wouldn't say no to lane johnson but i highly doubt it.
    C, just no.
    ILB, i don't think any of them rate this high of a selection.
    OG, with the re-signing of foster, i don't think we go for one this high.
    NT, i think we will be fine out of mclendon,ta'amu, and fangupo. that is 3 good prospects we have.
    TE, we wait on heath to play with spaeth,paulson,DJ,pianalto,mccoy.
    FB, i love willj. no change there.

    that leaves: FS,SS,CB,WR,OLB

    FS,clark has 1 year remaining. he is up in age but played well. golden behind him.
    SS, troy, near the end of his career, but still plays well. health is a big issue. cromartie-smith behind him.
    CB, we will be alright this year without injuries. ike could be in his last year with a 7 mil. cap hit next year. allen would move to his #1 spot then we would need a starter at the #2 spot by then.
    WR, we have brown as the high paid guy. sanders 1 year left, along with cotchery and buress with a year left.
    OLB, we have a 2nd rounder ready to step in but only signed for 1 year and another 2nd rounder on the other side that can't stay healthy. a 3rd year guy behind them and a 2nd year guy behind him.

    i say our #1 will come at one of these positions. i'd have to say 4 of these spots will be drafted and RB and ILB will come into the mix too after rd.1 to find new starters. it's the defenses turn to go first, so it comes down to OLB,S,CB. one of these spots get the 1st pick. scratch who they have on the boards at the other positions. who's the highest ranked guy at one of these spots when we pick is the question. that's my thinking on it anyway.

    :cool:
     
  19. numbah58

    numbah58 Staff Member Mod Team

    1,856
    29
    Oct 16, 2011
    Well thought out and I agree with one exception. I believe NT is slightly in the mix. I like McClendon but other than him all I see are question marks. We really don't know how the legal issues will play out with Ta'amu. As for Fangupo, well he was a late round pick that hasn't proved anything yet in an NFL uniform. As I said, I think NT might be in the mix but I find it a bit unlikely because that would be (3) 1st round picks on the DL. However, I believe the Patriots had (3) 1st rounders on their DL a while back.
     
  20. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,233
    100
    Oct 17, 2011
    Nice breakdown, mac. There are OLBs, S, and CBs in this draft worth the #17 pick, but I think there's a chance none of them will be around. I don't doubt that one of the six pass rushers will make it, but I kind of doubt that the Steelers have all six of them rated high enough to take at #17. Surely they don't have all of them at #17 or higher on their big board, and we know they don't reach. This is the first draft I can remember where I can really, really see them trading down. And depending on who's left, I kind of want to. It's definitely the first time for that. Normally I'm all about one or two guys guy that I am desperately hoping will fall to us or would totally trade up for (DeCastro, Mike Pouncey, Maurkice Pouncey, Mike Iupati, Alex Mack, Brandon Albert, Ryan Kalil in the 2nd, Nick Mangold... hmm, I'm noticing a pattern). But this year, not only do we have so many needs that it's hard to pick a priority, but I'm more weary than sold on the players hovering around #17, and I kind of like the late 1st-2nd round guys. I think trading down could get us safer players, and more of them too.
     
  21. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    27,859
    5,347
    Oct 22, 2011
    we know more about these NT's then a draft pick coming in fresh, i would think. wouldn't they be just as much of a unproven entity? what i do like about what we have at NT is amongst the 3 all of them have played DE also in a 3-4, which makes them versitile. i'm thinking we keep them all and have a rotation of them as the 4th or 5th DE freeing up a spot to add an extra pass rush specialist. maybe like a mingo type player. it would make sense.:cool:
     
  22. numbah58

    numbah58 Staff Member Mod Team

    1,856
    29
    Oct 16, 2011
    The only NT we have on the roster that we know anything about is McClendon. So I'm not so sure we don't add to the mix. I'm not saying that I support a NT in the 1st round but a case could definitely be made for it, IMO.
     
  23. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,233
    100
    Oct 17, 2011
    I agree in that I don't support it but I think a case can be made, but only if you trade down first.
     
  24. numbah58

    numbah58 Staff Member Mod Team

    1,856
    29
    Oct 16, 2011
    I'm really warming up to the trade-down scenario.. I don't see a whole bunch of difference between the players expected to go in our range and the players expected to go late 1st. Add a pick or two and find a good player (Minter, Elam, J. Jones or Moore, Banks or Trufant, Hankins, Lacy, Hopkins), Iater in the 1st seems to be a logical plan to me.
     
  25. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    27,859
    5,347
    Oct 22, 2011
    i think alot of teams feel that way about this draft.

    i think there was way too much emphasis put on these DE/OLB that it got really top heavy with potential moreso then actual results. teams may not feel alot of these guys deserve that high of picks with the boom or bust potential attached. it may adjust itself come draft day.

    teams may see more guys from other positions raise up the boards as safer bets by draft time. we have seen some of this happening throughout. the montgomery's and okafor's and mingo's are settling in where they probably should be. to be honest there are alot of good O-linemen in this draft. it would be a good year to stock up on some.

    i really don't see too many top dog can't miss guys anywhere in this draft. is it because more guys are coming out early?

    :cool:
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!