1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

James Harrison's appeal denied

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by truckin9999, Dec 16, 2011.

  1. truckin9999

    truckin9999 Well-Known Member

    5,373
    1,119
    Oct 16, 2011
  2. ScottChab

    ScottChab Well-Known Member

    3,575
    0
    Oct 17, 2011
  3. 4EvrH8O'donnel

    4EvrH8O'donnel Well-Known Member

    920
    0
    Nov 18, 2011
    Honestly did anybody expect anything less?

    You can be sure that Rog will be watching James closely in the playoffs and salivating at every hit he makes to see if he can possibly suspend him for a game or 2 in the playoffs.
    JMHO.
     
  4. blair

    blair Well-Known Member

    150
    0
    Oct 16, 2011
    Exactly what was expected. Why do they even have an appeal process?
     
  5. Thigpen82

    Thigpen82 Bitter optimist

    10,523
    1,534
    Oct 17, 2011
    It gives NFL Total Access something to talk about I guess.

    Maybe prolonging the debate about suspensions/"repeat offenders" etc. by challenging the ruling is a good thing? Though I'm not sure I've seen too many people change their minds about it.
     
  6. ScottChab

    ScottChab Well-Known Member

    3,575
    0
    Oct 17, 2011
    If Harrison gets another personal foul flag, he'll be gone for the rest of the season, not a game or 2 in the playoffs.
     
  7. bettissb40

    bettissb40 Well-Known Member

    688
    35
    Oct 16, 2011
    Harrison should know better by now. I know that is his style of football but he belongs to the NFL and must follow their rules. He must sit on his brains. Once, Twice maybe but after that he gets what he deserves. All he is doing now is hurting the team and his bank account. :wizard:
     
  8. Steel Acorn

    Steel Acorn Well-Known Member

    2,709
    250
    Oct 17, 2011
    I'm a little surprised no one has made the argument that this is for Harrison's safety, too. Would you lead with your head if you had recently had your eye socket broken? And isn't he at risk for concussions (at least concussion-like symptoms :hehehe: ) if he continues to tackle this way? Maybe this is really for his own good.
     
  9. rukus4ever

    rukus4ever Well-Known Member

    2,002
    79
    Oct 24, 2011
    What about the argument that because he has hurt his orbital bone he wasn't trying to hit the guy like that because he thought he was gonna be running it (ball was tucked as JH approached)?

    Intent needs to be taken into account with this. And offensive players need to share in the responsibility for H2H and illegal contact penalties.

    Bob Labriola said it on Talkin' Steelers Football on Steelers.com... if the NFL is going to work toward player safety, "...then DO IT. No, 'you can hit this guy, but not that guy.'" And I agree with him. Bob L. referenced the Browns LB that initiated H2H on Mendy.

    Also, offensive players shouldn't be able to duck once the defender has launched themselves. Otherwise, the offensive player is initiating H2H.

    McCoy tucked the ball, became a runner, then pulled up to pass at the last minute. Also, he was outside the pocket. There should be a change in the rules for something like that. If QBs want the protection then they have to stay in the pocket. If they leave the pocket, then it's open season. They're still football players. Sheesh!

    But the league, the "anyalysts" and the commentators don't want to have these kinds of conversations. :thumbsdown:
     
  10. BLACKnGOLDsince72

    BLACKnGOLDsince72 Well-Known Member

    1,062
    7
    Oct 16, 2011
    Did you ever see a running back be effective running through the hole in a straight up position ? Thats why you'll never see the rule apply to RB's. The day they do that we might as well stop watching football.
     
  11. SteelerD

    SteelerD Well-Known Member

    273
    0
    Oct 20, 2011
    The game needs fewer rules, not more
     
  12. snipit73

    snipit73

    1,697
    96
    Oct 23, 2011
  13. mdbates2

    mdbates2 Well-Known Member

    1,359
    1
    Nov 3, 2011
  14. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,550
    10,153
    Oct 16, 2011
    He is a 100% correct. Unfortunately Goodell has changed the game. As Mark Schlereth said, James Harrison is being fined and suspended for playing football.
     
  15. ScottChab

    ScottChab Well-Known Member

    3,575
    0
    Oct 17, 2011
    How in the world do you detemine intent? Ask the player? Say "Well, he had a broken orbital bone so it doesn't make sense that he would do it intentionally"? Offsides penalties aren't intentional... false starts aren't intentional... facemasks and horsecollars may or may not be intentional. It's impossible to take intent into consideration.

    I agree with Labriola's comment. If Goodell truly wants to protect all players, make all H2H contact illegal for both the offense and the defense. No more RBs dropping their heads to blast a defender, no defenders dropping their heads to blast a RB.

    As for your comment about offensive players not being allowed to duck their heads once a defensive player launches themselves... 1) Defensive players aren't allowed to launch themselves and 2) It is a natural reaction to drop your head if you see someone coming at you. There is no way the NFL could ban natural reactions.
     
  16. ScottChab

    ScottChab Well-Known Member

    3,575
    0
    Oct 17, 2011
    And that is the attitude that is going to end his season(s) and/or career prematurely.
     
  17. bigsteelerfaninky

    bigsteelerfaninky Well-Known Member

    7,235
    366
    Oct 24, 2011
    no its not...... its called a real football player
     
  18. ScottChab

    ScottChab Well-Known Member

    3,575
    0
    Oct 17, 2011
    So real football players don't have to follow rules?
     
  19. Romans5:8

    Romans5:8 Well-Known Member

    232
    4
    Oct 17, 2011
    It sounds like you agree with the rules that James is being asked to follow.

    I do not. There was nothing malicious or dirty about James' hit on McCoy. Was it against the rules? Apparently so...which is why I disagree with the rules.

    If you agree with the rules, you are not alone...others share that opinion too. There are also those who disagree. It's really not a question of whether or not real football players have to or don't have to follow rules. It's about what rules they have to follow.
     
  20. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,243
    103
    Oct 17, 2011
    You've already said a number of times Harrison intended to go for McCoy's helmet. That he chose to do so when he didn't have to. That he made the decision. How do you know, since it's impossible to determine his intent?
     
  21. ScottChab

    ScottChab Well-Known Member

    3,575
    0
    Oct 17, 2011
    If it wasn't his decision to drop his head and make contact with McCoy's facemask, whose was it? Ok, maybe he didn't intend to go for his head but he clearly intended to go high. He knew he was on thin ice so going high shouldn't have even been a consideration.
     
  22. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,243
    103
    Oct 17, 2011
    I don't think as much planning goes into this as you think. The only thing we know for sure he decided is to hit the guy, which of course is not a fineable offense and only borderline of being worth a penalty.

    You just conceded that we can't prove he actually went for his head, which is true. So now we're just talking about the general location of where he tackled the guy. Now it's a matter of two inches or so + a bunch of BS from last year that got him suspended.

    The only thing that he really, really did that's different from other players (besides be better and a bigger badass) is the magazine article. So if that deserves a suspension, fine, but be straight about it and do it at the right time. Don't say "No worries" and then screw him over later. Don't pretend it's about what he does on the field, when his on-field actions don't deserve anything resembling a suspension.
     
  23. cory_86

    cory_86 Well-Known Member

    1,213
    2
    Oct 23, 2011
    I don't agree with the rules, but James is stupid (and hurting himself + the team) by not playing within the rules.
    He can't just act like a little kid and stomp his feet and say "I DON'T WANT" and hope he gets what he wants. If he wants to keep playing football in the NFL, he will have to adapt, otherwise he won't be playing much longer in Pittsburgh (maybe the punks in Oakland will take him)

    And yes, i'm losing patience with him. It's true that Goodell and his crusade is stupid but the players have to deal with it, firstly by playing within the rules and if the majority is against those rules, negotiate for rule changes as a group.
     
  24. HugeSnack

    HugeSnack Well-Known Member

    5,243
    103
    Oct 17, 2011
    Works for Tom Brady.
     
  25. cory_86

    cory_86 Well-Known Member

    1,213
    2
    Oct 23, 2011
    so you'd give your kid what he wants just because the spoiled brat next door has success with his foot-stomping? ;)
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!