1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Is it time to draft a QB?

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Steelers89, Oct 17, 2016.

  1. cajunyankee

    cajunyankee Well-Known Member

    4,121
    677
    Oct 27, 2011
    To answer your question Landry and Zach are not our future franchise QBs and we won't look to focus on obtaining a franchise QB until Ben is gone and we go 3-13 and draft very high.

    We could do like we did with Landry, take a gamble on a mid rd QB and maybe get lucky like the skins and boys but unless that happens, the above scenario takes place.

    Cajun
     
  2. cajunyankee

    cajunyankee Well-Known Member

    4,121
    677
    Oct 27, 2011

    No

    Cajun
     
  3. JAD

    JAD Well-Known Member

    3,273
    361
    Jan 2, 2012
    I think from next years draft on if there is a franchise type QB that they really like when we pick we should go after him instead of waiting until Ben retires and we go 3-13.

    This may take a couple of years to get the QB they want, but we need to start looking now. I think I heard today Ben only played 16 games a year only 3 times in his 13 year carrie.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. 1SteelHeart

    1SteelHeart Active Member

    39
    0
    Sep 25, 2016

    Haley's plays take way too long to develop. Our line is great when running the ball or quick passes are being delivered. It is time to get an OC who can help Ben rather than get him injured. Tired of Haleys lack of consistent ball control.
     
  5. Clive From PIT

    Clive From PIT I don't often drink...but I'm starting to. Site Admin

    3,103
    944
    Dec 14, 2015
    What happened to the Todd Haley who brought in the quick-release stuff that kept Ben upright and uninjured? Did I dream that?
     
  6. AskQuestionsLater

    AskQuestionsLater Writing Team

    22,869
    5,704
    Apr 21, 2016


    I think Justis Mosqueda of Bleacherreport has a better insight on quarterbacks of the future and how they should be assessed in terms of the financial maintenance.


    "The new conversation around quarterback contracts will be changing soon, judging by the climate of the 2016 season. No longer is the battle trying to acquire a passer at any cost, handing over a blank check when given the opportunity, but to properly value game managers at the position, allowing for cornerstones of team identity to come from the defensive side of the ball."
     
  7. AskQuestionsLater

    AskQuestionsLater Writing Team

    22,869
    5,704
    Apr 21, 2016


    ? This sounds more like vintage Bruce Arians than Todd Haley.
     
  8. 1SteelHeart

    1SteelHeart Active Member

    39
    0
    Sep 25, 2016
    I agree. Arians could move the football between the 20's better than any I have seen, but in the redzone he couldn't get the score. Haley can manage a game very well, but his plays lack structure. The OL coach is amazing and should be given much more credit for the sucess of the running game
     
  9. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    30,002
    7,419
    Nov 14, 2011
    The Jets?
     
  10. AskQuestionsLater

    AskQuestionsLater Writing Team

    22,869
    5,704
    Apr 21, 2016

    Munchak is a Hall of Fame offensive lineman.. so it is no surprise that players like Alejandro Villanueva, Chris Hubbard and BJ Finney can maximize the "next man up" mantra.


    Regarding Haley.. how true. If only Haley just attacked the weak points of defensive concepts like the Wide 9, there is no question that, despite a bad game, Pittsburgh may have ended up winning given Le'Veon's yards on fewer than 15 carries..


    ... on that note.. given the fact that gap containment of the B and C gaps is not only the Wide 9's paradigm of a weakness but Le'Veon Bell's strengths as a runner.., it is quite ambiguous to see Haley abandon the run game early outside that trick play.
     
  11. bigbenhotness

    bigbenhotness Well-Known Member

    21,326
    3,312
    Nov 1, 2014
    That well lol meaning they can sometimes. I don't know I'm reaching
     
  12. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,373
    9,386
    Oct 16, 2011
    Yup, even without the injuries adding up on Ben, I figured next year is the year to draft a QB, if a suitable one is present. I usually don't spend any time watching QB's in the draft but will in this one.
     
  13. AskQuestionsLater

    AskQuestionsLater Writing Team

    22,869
    5,704
    Apr 21, 2016

    I would not personally if I were you. DeShone Kizer is currently your best bet but will be long gone after the fact.



    Mitch Trubisky and Luke Falk are also quarterbacks you should check out.
     
  14. steelers5859

    steelers5859 Well-Known Member

    2,882
    68
    Oct 23, 2011
    We've faced some formidable defensive fronts. Washington, Jets, Dolphins and KC have very good fronts. We usually can't handle them because we don't have any road graders. Just finesse style guards and tackles.
     
  15. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    14,975
    2,356
    Oct 26, 2011
    Yes they may! Why wasn't he given the chance against NE? I created a thread last year questioning why the Landry Jones experiment hasn't ended. Was ridiculed for my thinking. I personally have seen enough of Landry Jones. That ship has sailed. It's time for the Steelers to aquire Ben's replacement.
    When a QB can't protect themselves, its time. It's not about arm strength although it is important, but Favre, Kelly, Marino, Warner all still had the arm to get it done. They just couldn't protect themselves anymore. You will continue to see this played out right before your eyes.
     
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2016
  16. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,022
    4,612
    Nov 4, 2011
    Totally disagree. A franchise QB can have a 15 year career with one franchise, and will generally keep that franchise relevant for that entire span of time. The players around that QB will come and go, but the franchise QB provides a cornerstone around which to build for the long-run. Occasionally a team built around defense will win it all (see Denver last year), but usually the champions have a franchise QB that's the cornerstone of the franchise. The defense-centric team relies on having a handful of star defenders, and will inevitably lose many of them to free agency after a very brief run as a top-tier unit. Unless they draft extremely well on a consistent basis and replace stars with stars, they fall off pretty quickly. It will be curious to see how Denver fares over the course of the season with a defense-centric identity and a new QB with a first round QB waiting in the wings. My guess is that they'll struggle to compete for the division this year, even though Siemien is probably no worse now than Manning was last season. The handful of defensive losses in the offseason have already started their defense on a downward track. That's why Elway is trying hard to replace the franchise QB as a cornerstone to build around by trading up for Lynch. He understands that the QB is key to being a top team over an extended period of time.

    Of course you do have to build a good team around that QB to avoid ending up like the Chargers, but having that QB is at least half the battle.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. Thigpen82

    Thigpen82 Bitter optimist

    10,359
    1,476
    Oct 17, 2011
    I don't remember the thread, but I find it hard to believe given the amount of anti-Landry sentiment there is around here.

    It's like the times that people post "why does Tomlin never get criticised?", when it's a fairly standard practice around here.

    Mettenberger and Jones are in the same practices, showing the same drills to the same coaches. Maybe Mettenberger has better intangibles in a real game situation. Maybe he comes in late in the game and surprises us all, like Jones did when he took over from Vick. For now, it's not really inconceivable that the coaches would stick to the depth chart they've structured around their knowledge of the team.

    In terms of the OP: it would always be good to pick up potential future QBs. But I fully expect the same charges people are levelling at Jones to be levelled at anyone who gets put in instead of Ben, the first time they show any remote sign of weakness.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  18. Diamond

    Diamond Well-Known Member

    5,790
    469
    May 26, 2012
    Has there ever been a QB criticized as much as jones, based on two game starts and who has only attempted 55 passes in live game action in 4 years, fans seem to think he should be judged against ben and backups with years of experience, he needs game time experience before he can be productive at a top level, 55 passes in real game time isnt going to be a measuring stick to determine if he is going to be a successful pro QB or not, getting these starts till ben gets back will be the determining factor on whether we see improvement from him in game to game action or not, I happen to think he isnt as bad as you all think he is despite his 2 game start 1-1 record which isnt bad considering his limited game experience....
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  19. Diamond

    Diamond Well-Known Member

    5,790
    469
    May 26, 2012

    He's thrown 55 passes in season scheduled game action and youve seen enough of him, I dont think you'll be getting any calls to be a quarterback scout any time soon......
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. SteelHack

    SteelHack Well-Known Member

    2,851
    817
    Oct 21, 2011
    No....I don't think so....It's time to get a good backup.....anyone you draft today...will be up for FA about the same time Ben is getting ready to call it a career.

    That being said...if you feel "THE GUY" is there...you should take him.

    Myself....I really liked Cardale Jones this year....Very Ben like...and would have been a good understudy.......That being said...I would make a run at EJ Manual next season....He has been replaced as the starter...and Cardale is in the wings as the next back up.

    HACK
     
  21. steeler guru

    steeler guru Well-Known Member

    355
    55
    Feb 28, 2015
    Haley's plays don't take too long to develop at all. Haley calls a play and Ben tries to run the play, but if it isn't there, Ben looks elsewhere. If you have both WR's running a hero, it is gonna take a second to see which one gets separation, and if neither shakes loose, Ben has to look for the TE or dump off to a RB.

    You can't question Haley at all, because Haley calls the play, Ben can audible or choose the wrong target in his progression. The safetys probably have more influence than Haley. lol
     
  22. DonKnock

    DonKnock Well-Known Member

    120
    6
    Apr 28, 2016
    I hope we go after Lamar Jackson
     
  23. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    14,975
    2,356
    Oct 26, 2011
    I don't know who or if the Steelers will draft Ben's heir apparent. But I hope their
    choice is sooner rather than later.
     
  24. MeanJoeBlue

    MeanJoeBlue Well-Known Member

    1,251
    464
    Jan 2, 2013
    Sorry to pick on your post, but it reminded me of the discussion on back-up QBs, about why Pittsburgh isn't doing as well as the Patriots or the Cowboys.

    Considering that this team still has talent/depth problems at OLB, TE and CB (although more experience for the young players might take the TEs and CBs off the emergency list in a year or two), spending more picks on QBs probably would have made the situation worse. As long as Ben is around and Jones can become an adequate back-up (not starter), I'd like to see the overall team talent improve before using picks on QBs.

    The skins, boys, and pats have gotten lucky, but they've also spent a lot of (high) picks in order to be lucky.
    As fans, we tend to ignore their failures when they finally get a success.

    In the last 12 years, these are the draft picks spent on QB:
    Steelers: a 4th (Jones), and two 5ths (Dixon, Jacobs)
    Cowboys: a 3rd (McGee), and two 4ths (Prescott, Stanback)
    Patriots: a 2nd (Garoppolo), three 3rds (Brissett, Mallett, O'Connell), and two 7ths (Robinson, Cassel)
    Washington: two 1sts (Griffin, Campbell), a 3rd (Cousins), and three 6ths (Sudfeld, Brennan, Palmer)

    Can you imagine if the Steelers spent a 3rd round pick on a QB (Mallet) who contributed nothing, and was traded 2 years later for a 7th round pick? A lot of fans would be irate, wondering why the team doesn't do things like the Patriots...
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  25. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    14,975
    2,356
    Oct 26, 2011
    Yes I have, I take the eyeball test, that's all I need. I hope Landry wins all the games he plays for the rest of his Steeler career. Then the Steelers aquire a QB and they unload Landry Jones.
     
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2016
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!