1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Interesting comments from Chris Carter on Mike and Mike

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by JackAttack 5958, Dec 10, 2013.

  1. freakfontana

    freakfontana

    5,445
    23
    Oct 19, 2011
    i don't know if we game plan vs the opponents , but i know for sure a lot of opponents had a good game plan against the steelers ... :rolleyes:
     
  2. aces4me

    aces4me Well-Known Member

    268
    13
    Jan 2, 2012
    Again Bill might have perfected some techniques the Pats were hardly the only team trying to gain an edge.

    From the internets and therefore absolutely true:

    2. The Dolphins bought game tapes of the Patriots to study Tom Brady's audibles before a MNF game in Dec 2006. Zach Thomas admitted to knowing all Brady's signals from the tape study. The league ruled that such tape study is okay.

    3. Denver Broncos coach Mike Shanahan admitted in 2002 to hiring lip readers to steal signals. He bragged that his lipreaders could get all the signals by the end of the 1st half, sometimes by the end of the 1st quarter.

    4. The Jets were accused of cheating by calling illegal audibles in a game against the Ravens. Brian Billick said that the illegal audibles by the Jets resulted in 3 offside penalties.

    Being the detail obsessed jerk that he is Belichek isn't going to let someone else out do him on the intelligence front.
     
  3. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    I don't think Belichek does anything drastically different than other coaches, it's just that he appears to pay extreme attention to even the smallest details. I remember reading last year how before the Pats/Texans game, the Pats mimicked JJ Watt in practice by holding items up in front of Brady and he had to try to throw around or over them. Tiny details like that can make a big difference. It's also no shock that the Pats kept JJ Watt in check that game and beat them easily.

    Belichek is a huge scheme guy whereas Tomlin has admitted he isn't.
     
  4. aces4me

    aces4me Well-Known Member

    268
    13
    Jan 2, 2012
    I do agree that Belichek isn't doing anything planning or spying wise that isn't done all over. It is just his attention to detail that makes him better at it that most other coaches.
     
  5. bigsteelerfaninky

    bigsteelerfaninky Well-Known Member

    7,235
    366
    Oct 24, 2011
    it also helps when you know what the other team is getting ready to do on Offense or Defense
    Just ask the guy from Houston
     
  6. Steel_in_DC

    Steel_in_DC Well-Known Member

    764
    14
    Jan 27, 2012
    But I think the point that 12to88 is making is that BB is willing to go beyond the pale of what is acceptable or "I'll give this spying thing a try" and makes it a more calculated approach to how he plans for a game. Who knows, but one thing Spygate revealed was how detailed the Patriots got and we will never really know how detailed it may have been because the Fuhrer (excuse me Goodell) confiscated the tapes.

    Anyway - to some extent it even accentuates BB's coaching credentials even more because you recognize how much the guy is thinking about everything. I mean you know the old saying "If you ain't cheating, you're not really trying!" :eek:
     
  7. GB_Steel

    GB_Steel Well-Known Member

    2,131
    117
    Oct 20, 2011
    The Big Three take a lot of heat around here, but maybe our quality control group is lacking? Aren't they the ones who study tendencies in other teams? If our scouting staff is terrible then we have terrible drafts and FA signings, if our QC staff is bad, then our gameplans may also be bad and based on flawed information.
     
  8. aces4me

    aces4me Well-Known Member

    268
    13
    Jan 2, 2012
    I might be wrong about this because I've never been around a football program but I thought the QA group's job was to break down tape into plays and group them by down and distance. I thought tendencies were done by position coaches.
     
  9. GB_Steel

    GB_Steel Well-Known Member

    2,131
    117
    Oct 20, 2011
    I think you're correct.
     
  10. Thigpen82

    Thigpen82 Bitter optimist

    10,523
    1,534
    Oct 17, 2011
    Hang on, I think I'm missing something here.

    Is all of this discussion based on what Brady said in an interview? He mentioned they had a gameplan, and that means that we don't?

    Not sure I follow.
     
  11. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,529
    10,144
    Oct 16, 2011
    Be amused all you want, but I'm not talking about hand signals, you think Goodell destroyed tapes of hand signals? They were tapes of the Rams walk through, believe what you want, but what Belichick was doing was not the norm.
     
  12. bignasty92

    bignasty92 Well-Known Member

    491
    33
    Oct 26, 2011

    Uh yea, I came to respond to the initial question asked and so far all ive read about is the Pat's , Brady, and Bellichek. But oh well continue on. I actually enjoyed reading the debate above. ;)
     
  13. aces4me

    aces4me Well-Known Member

    268
    13
    Jan 2, 2012
    If you think the Pats still had illegal tape of a 2001 walk through in 2007 then I suspect there is no reasoning with you. Bill might be crooked but he isn't stupid. Anything that damning would have been destroyed as soon as possible.
     
  14. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    LOL! Actually, the purpose of my post was to stimulate discussion on how much the Steelers actually integrate strategy and scheme into their gameplan. I am of the belief, and Tomlin's own words seem to confirm it, that Tomlin is not very strong when it comes to a) identifying an opponent's weaknesses and tendencies and b) designing a scheme and a gameplan specifically designed to exploit those. Just interested in everyone's thoughts on that. It's turned into a "who's greater, Brady or Belichick?", thread though.
     
  15. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    Based on watching the Steelers and what Tomlin himself has said, he seems to be of the opinion that we're going to line up and do what we do and were going to make the other team stop us, regardless of the strengths and weaknesses of the other team. He doesn't seem to be a big scheme guy. We have our game plan and it doesn't seem to change a whole lot.

    The Patriots seem to be the complete opposite. They drastically alter their game plan every week it seems. They even go as far as to bench or not dress certain players based on what they want to do that week (obviously not their top players).
     
  16. jeh1856

    jeh1856 Im a happy camper

    32,864
    11,714
    Oct 26, 2011
    Remember Belichick spent 5 years as HC in Cleveland without Brady. He was 36-44.
     
  17. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,529
    10,144
    Oct 16, 2011
    I never said anything about them still having that walk through in 2007, they weren't even in the 2007 SB. I said they had taped the Rams walk through (2002 SB) and it was destroyed.
     
  18. Rush2seven

    Rush2seven Well-Known Member

    13,750
    2,081
    Oct 17, 2011
    As for how Belichick will do after Brady, I wouldn't be surprised that they follow each other into retirement.
     
  19. Thigpen82

    Thigpen82 Bitter optimist

    10,523
    1,534
    Oct 17, 2011
    Gotcha.

    In some ways, I think Tomlin and all of the Steelers play to that "we're not scheming" front. Of course there will be the same amount of planning that most teams do. It's like it's our "thing", in a way - we've got the gunslinging QB, the maverick SS, and we used to have the violent madman at LB.

    But I also wish in a way that, if that's our PR face, then we would go out and out for it on the field as well. If we're going to be a 'fundamentals' team, then go with a reduced playbook and execute those plays better than anyone else. Run no-huddle as much as possible. At the moment we seem to be trying to do a few too many things at once. Kind of like what destroyed Kordell Stewart's career.
     
  20. Thigpen82

    Thigpen82 Bitter optimist

    10,523
    1,534
    Oct 17, 2011
    Ssh! Nobody must remember the Cleveland days.

    In the same way, to be fair, that nobody must remember Lebeau's record as a HC.
     
  21. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,529
    10,144
    Oct 16, 2011
    I don't harp too much on the Cleveland days because it was his first gig and a good coach will get better as time goes on. BUT, I suspect that he's going to follow in the footsteps of many legend coaches and have some down years once Brady retires. I don't think Mallet will be the next Brady, I suspect at most, the next Jay Cutler. We'll find out the true measure of Belichicks "greatness" after Brady rides off into the sunset. Assuming he doesn't retire then, like someone else mentioned.
     
  22. Rawsteel73

    Rawsteel73 Well-Known Member

    64
    2
    Apr 28, 2012
    f$$%% the patroits they are cheaters and every victory including super bowls should have asterisks the guys get caught cheating and even on this message board gets props give me a break.we are going to lose a draft pick for something far less egregious than spying on other teams plus a fine once again i say F@#$ the CHEATRIOTS and their tainted legacy that is all
     
  23. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    15,650
    2,482
    Oct 26, 2011
    It saddens me to say this, Bill is
    head and
    shoulders way better than MT
    Not even close. And when TB retires and if Bill is still coaching he will still be successful.You see, I hate the Pats and Ravens
    more than any other teams in the NFL. Because I feel they stand in the way of Steeler success.
     
  24. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,529
    10,144
    Oct 16, 2011
    [​IMG] Originally Posted by aces4me [​IMG]
    If you think the Pats still had illegal tape of a 2001 walk through in 2007 then I suspect there is no reasoning with you. Bill might be crooked but he isn't stupid. Anything that damning would have been destroyed as soon as possible.

    Brain fart, had to refresh my memory of the details, way off on the timeline. No, he wouldn't have kept those tapes for 6 years but I do believe he taped the Rams walk through and that's what I was referring to, not the taping of hand signals.

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs07/news/story?id=3227245
     
  25. aces4me

    aces4me Well-Known Member

    268
    13
    Jan 2, 2012
    Maybe he had them and no one has come forward to talk about it after all this time. Although I tend to believe big secrets don't last long..people want to talk especially when they might get a payday for it. I have no idea what he had, he can't prove it if he didn't and wouldn't admit it if he had so I don't imagine we will ever know.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!