1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Interesting Article About Ben Roethlisberger

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by TerribleTowelFlying, Jun 20, 2012.

  1. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    22,941
    2,123
    Oct 12, 2011
    I was listening to Greg Linelli earlier and he was discussing this article by Greg Cosell: Cosell Talks: Re-Examining Roethlisberger. I thought I'd share it, since he has an interesting analysis of Ben's progression with pre-snap reads throughout his career, and on Ben as a pocket passer.
     
  2. TheSteelHurtin2188

    TheSteelHurtin2188 Well-Known Member

    5,380
    261
    Nov 30, 2011
    Good read an I agree with the part about when his pre snap read is good he is very good in the pocket.
     
  3. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    28,737
    5,730
    Oct 22, 2011
    good read. i've harped on this for years about the reason he wings it so much. i also think with this line he won't have to leave that pocket as fast. he will have to learn to trust they can keep them off him longer. with the past line his mental clock went off much faster because the rush came at him so quick at times. he had to read on the fly because he doesn't read defenses quick to start with. now i expect he could have as much as 3 more seconds in the pocket to just concentrate on the defense instead of where the rush is coming. he should have a well defined pocket inwhich to work too. not just some resemblence of one that changed every snap, because he didn't know which of them was going to breakdown on this play. now he will have more to think about with the new offense , so this new line couldn't have come at a better time. :cool:
     
  4. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,080
    828
    Oct 16, 2011
    I always like reading Greg Cosell's articles. For those that have Sirius, he's on the Opening Drive with Ross Tucker every Wednesday at around 6:30 am. I enjoy listening to what he has to say, he knows his stuff.

    Ben's never been a student of the game, but if he can ever master the X's and O's like Brady and Peyton, there's no reason he can't be as good as those guys.
     
  5. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,360
    9,378
    Oct 16, 2011
    Great read, thanks TTF :thumbs_up: Man I hope we don't take too much time to get in sync with the new offense, with the improvement of Bens game, we could be scary good. I want to say right out of the gate but probably after about 4 or 5 games, then we start hammering teams :herewego:
     
  6. Aerosteel

    Aerosteel Well-Known Member

    615
    50
    Oct 19, 2011
    In the article he says "I would submit that few quarterbacks have shown as much improvement over the course of their careers as Roethlisberger." "Gradually over time, Roethlisberger has gotten better and better." Hmmm. Sounds like a student of the game to me. Guess you didn't like this article. Doesn't fit your Ben hatin' beliefs.
     
  7. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,080
    828
    Oct 16, 2011
    The article was just fine, so don't put words in my mouth. I even said Ben could be just as good as Brady and Manning, that sounds like a compliment to me, not an insult towards Ben. I don't deny his talent, but to say he's always been a student of the game is wrong. He's improved drastically because he was pretty terrible for the first few years of his career. He's still not great when it comes to reading defences, but yes, he has dramatically improved. I expect Haley will help him get even better and over the next few years, I think we'll see the best Ben we've ever seen.
     
  8. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    I read that article last night on NFL.COM and thought about mentioning it here but I just figured it would start a big fight over whether Ben was "good" or not. It seems that some people on here like him and some people on here despise him. I'm in the LOVE him group so I don't know if that puts me in a minority or not. But I agree with what the article said. People can talk about Brady and Manning and Rogers and Brees all they want to. But put them behind what Ben has had for the last 4 years and tell me who's great.
     
  9. Aerosteel

    Aerosteel Well-Known Member

    615
    50
    Oct 19, 2011
    I don't need to put words in your mouth - I just read your posts. Here is a sampling: "I despise Ben" "It's frustrating for me hating a player so much who is the star of my favourite team" "Besides, as a Ben hater..." "I think he's a gigantic assh**e and always will be" "I hate him with a severe passion" I could go on, but the record is clear. You are a Ben Hater. It taints all your posts. If you are not careful, it will affect everything you do, gnawing away at your soul, eventually consuming your entire existence. Come back to the light while you can. Say this after me. " I love Ben. I really do. He is the best thing to happen to this organization in decades. Ben is a great quarterback. He will win many more Lombardis. I am lucky to watch him play."
     
  10. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,080
    828
    Oct 16, 2011
    The first year Rodgers took over as starter, his line was terrible. We have had a bad line, there's no denying that, but Rodgers, Brady and Manning make their lines look better than they really are because they get the ball out so damn fast. Ben has all the tools to be up there with Brady and Rodgers, but he isn't yet, and you can't blame it on his line. Elite players are always elite regardless of their situation. Ben has to be great every week, and can't have those terrible games like he is known to have every now and then. I think Haley will really help him get a lot better.
     
  11. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    I honestly could understand having a problem with Ben's off the field persona. I really could. I could even understand having a problem with the fact that maybe he doesn't seem as assertive in pursuing the "knowledge" of the game. But when it's all said and done he's tough, he's a winner, and he's got his own way of doing things that work for him and obviously they work really good. Just ask the Ravens, Browns, Bungles, Cardinals, Colts, Broncos, Chargers, Jets, and all the other teams we've beat on the way to the parade in downtown Pittsburgh.
     
  12. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,080
    828
    Oct 16, 2011

    Yeah, I said all those things, so what? I'm still objective, and there's no denying Ben is extremely talented, but he has his downfalls, and the mental side of the game has always been the problem for him. Some players just don't have all the physical tools to get the job done, that's not the case for Ben. The mental side of it is the only thing holding him back from being up there with Brady, Manning, Rodgers and Brees. I really think a couple years with Haley and Ben will be mentioned with those guys. All that's missing is more consistency.

    As for my hatred for Ben tainting all my posts, that's your opinion, and your opinion is wrong, period. I hate Ben as a person, not as a player, there's a difference.
     
  13. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    I agree that Manning and Brady get the ball out fast. I even thought of that when I was typing their names. As far as his "bad Ben" games go Brett Favre was the same way and in my opinion he was great. Barry Sanders spent alot of his time going backwards and getting negative yards but in the end he also went forward alot and was very hard to tackle. I think it would be pretty hard to say that Barry or Brett wasn't elite because they had a flaw in their game.
     
  14. oldschool

    oldschool Well-Known Member

    2,468
    558
    Oct 19, 2011
    But he never said Favre or Sanders weren't elite.

    It's very easy to not like the guy and love the player. It sucks to have to do, but I have been doing it since the GA incident.

    Ben can improve and most likely will. And none of the ever mentioned elite QB's would have as much success as Ben has had with the same o-lines. No way no how...

    Ben was great from the moment he took the field and never losing a regular season game his rookie year and the best PlAYER (not person) we have had since Woodson.
     
  15. BURGH43STEL

    BURGH43STEL Well-Known Member

    2,691
    418
    Oct 23, 2011
    Ben didn't make the transition that he should had based on his talent level. I believe not putting in the necessary work off the field is what kept Ben from making that transition into an all time great. Not making that transition is what kept the Steelers offense from becoming a top 5 scoring unit. People can harp on BA or the Oline all they want but Ben is the player mostly responsible for the success and failure of the offense. It's his job to make up for deficiencies on the offense. Going forward, Ben will be the player that determines if the offense will become a top 5 scoring unit. Will Ben become a more consistent QB or will he remain an inconsistent QB? We shall see.
     
  16. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,360
    9,378
    Oct 16, 2011
    :blink: Shaner, you say the most effed up things when you discuss Ben. He won 27 of his first 31 games, phew, man he was terrible, guy sucked.
     
  17. TerribleTowelFlying

    TerribleTowelFlying Staff Member Site Admin Mod Team

    22,941
    2,123
    Oct 12, 2011
    I think we'll just have to agree to disagree there. There's absolutely no way you can overlook those two enormous factors when looking at overall offensive production.




    PS, and this isn't directed at anyone specifically, let's keep this discussion about football. Thanks.
     
  18. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,360
    9,378
    Oct 16, 2011

    Especially about the Oline, it's mind boggling that people try to dismiss that, enough with the quick release garbage, we have all seen what happens to Brady and Manning when you get pressure on them, they become very ordinary and even bad QB's. At least Ben still has the ability to play great football under pressure. I'll put Ben in the same elite category as them any day, don't care what anyone else thinks.
     
  19. thorn058

    thorn058 Well-Known Member

    16,389
    4,300
    Oct 19, 2011
    Lets be fair there T.E. They relied heavily on the run game early in Ben's career and limited the amount of the field he had to look at in the first two years at least. That is a well known and documented fact. You have countless videos where Cowher is telling Wiz about taking the handcuffs off, or talking with Ben about the coverage he sees and corrects him when he is wrong. He also used his legs alot more in those early days to gain yardage and not for the "extending" the play as he has become known for. So yes while he was winning games as your stat points out, some of his play was down right ugly and he needed to learn to play at an NFL level. I don't think anyone can throw stones at the end result of his drive to win or his competitive nature but if they gave style points for wins he would be dead last which is why it is good that they don't give out wins based on style.
     
  20. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    42,360
    9,378
    Oct 16, 2011
    Yes, they had a very good running attack, the same running attack that Maddox had and he never put a string like Bens together. I'm not disputing that the running game didn't aid him but what QB doesn't benefit from a good running game? To diminish what Ben accomplished because of the ground attack I feel is not being fair. And to say he was "terrible" his first few years as Shaner did is grossly unfair.
     
  21. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    I can understand alot of people saying that Ben "holds on to the ball too long". Alot of times I scream at the tv myself. But do you think that maybe the reason he did that was because he knew that BA was gonna just stand back and let him play his style and just accept the risk/reward that comes with it. Maybe now with Haley he will be encouraged to just take what the defense gives him and not have to go for the home run. However I have been seeing some headlines on NFL.COM saying that Ben is not gonna "change" and is gonna "play his style" so we will just have to see.
     
  22. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    Also for the people who seem to wish that Ben would be more "conventional" and more of a "pocket passer" I remember a very effective, conventional, pocket passer named Neil O'donnell. He threw really well from the pocket and did win a Super Bowl... FOR THE COWBOYS! I will take Ben anyday over probably every NFL qb in the league right now. He plays Steeler ball. He's tough. He aint pretty. He's not the best "student". He's not trying to be the valedictorian of the NFL. He just wants to win and so do I.
     
  23. D0bre Shunka

    D0bre Shunka Well-Known Member

    3,391
    482
    Jan 24, 2012
    If Ben is not putting in the off season work, or mentally preparing for play, or is just plain not a student of the game then I hope to h@ll he keeps doing it, it's served us well since his arrival.

    What has he done since donning our colors? What does the record say, has he improved or regressed over the years?

    C'mon man!
     
  24. Thigpen82

    Thigpen82 Bitter optimist

    10,351
    1,474
    Oct 17, 2011
    That's not really a great point (though I know it's kind of half serious). O'Donnell didn't throw the game away because he was a conventional pocket passer. He threw it away because... well, God hates us, or something.
     
  25. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    28,737
    5,730
    Oct 22, 2011
    why does ben get all the credit for those early days? we had alot better line then. we had one hell of a defense that always kept games close. we had a good run game too. cowher was happy with a 3 point lead in those days. bringing up maddox has no relevnce. he was not brought in to be the franchise. ben was. cowher never thought of a qb as an important cog in the wheel. he didn't even want ben. winning with maddox and o'donnel shows they didn't need a high scoring offense to win games. ben did have a little more talent then those others did, but we also put one heck of a team around him. he also had some really good qb coaches that tried to teach ben to be a better qb. i still believe to this day that he wouldn't listen to them as much as he should have, because of his ego. bens early successs directly led to his big ego that has held him back in alot of ways. with the talent he has, his worst enemy is himself. while being very talented, he had alot of help to win all those games. he also could have been alot more, with all the help he had. :cool:
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!