1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

if this is the fist pick

Discussion in 'The Bill Nunn Draft Room' started by steel1031, Mar 27, 2014.

  1. SteelCity_NB

    SteelCity_NB Staff Member Mod Team

    5,418
    684
    Oct 23, 2011
    Prediction:

    Mike Evans 2014 stats: 825 yards & 8 TDs
    Derek Moye 2014 stats: 100 yards & 1 TD

    Moye MIGHT turn out to be something but he still has a very long way to go. I know we've debated on this issue before, but we have really only seen a glimpse of Moye so far. It is impossible to say how his career turn out. Will he go back to being cut by every team under the sun or will he finally stake his claim to being a permanent roster player.

    If I am the Steelers, with only a few good Big Ben years left, I cannot gamble on the fact that Moye is going to see the light and break through in a big way. You cannot hope that Moye can be a Top 4 WR on the team. You need to bring someone else in (whether its an Evans, a Jordan Matthews or whoever) and then have Moye force his way into the lineup.
     
  2. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    30,216
    6,300
    Oct 22, 2011
    my premise was not using moye as an every down guy or j brown. we were talking about cooks added to the squad and moye and brown as red zone targets. I'm saying if this is the case we already have taller guys here for that purpose. do we know they can't do this? do we know evans can? both no. evans or any of the new wr's in this draft will never be deep threats either in this league which helps defenses. I still think we will go after Benjamin though. don't know why but just my gut feeling. Benjamin fuller or roby Matthews. I wouldn't be disappointed either way. I'm not very high on ebron or evans.:cool:
     
  3. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    Mike Evans is going to be a VERY GOOD player at the next level and he's obvioiusly highly touted. He's big, has good speed, creates separation and knows how to go get a contested ball. I realize that just because you're a big receiver doesn't guarantee success, but the Ratbirds won the Super Bowl year before last BECAUSE they rode the shoulders of a big receiver all the way to victory. You take Boldin off that team, they don't sniff the BIG GAME!
     
  4. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    30,216
    6,300
    Oct 22, 2011
    might as well draft 3 big ones and throw the ball up for grabs every play too.:facepalm::cool:
     
  5. SteelCity_NB

    SteelCity_NB Staff Member Mod Team

    5,418
    684
    Oct 23, 2011
    To me a great WR corps has to have balance.

    You don't need a tall receiver to be successful, but it definitely helps, all else being equal.

    Now, we won a SB with Cedric Wilson, ARE & Quincy Morgan being our #2-#4. But then again we had a dominant O-line and running attack.

    To me, just look at the Chicago Bears. Cutler is an ok QB but he's not great and not as good as Ben. But because he has Marshall & Jeffrey they are a terror in the red zone. We need to make up Cotchery's 10 TDs and I just don't see where it is going to come from our current WRs.

    I am a statistics and probability guy and I think it's irrational to think that Wheaton + Moye can get to 10 TDs. This draft is stocked with 6'2+ 210+ WRs. Do we HAVE to draft Evans? Nope, but you better go get one of these guys.
     
  6. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    30,216
    6,300
    Oct 22, 2011
    I wouldn't have a problem if they drafted cooks as the replacement for sanders. moore is there for stability if AB were to go down for some reason. I wouldn't have a problem with then drafting a second guy, not to start as cooks can do, but to go against what we have in moye and brown. brown is the longshot here anyway. he's more of a possession receiver. I'm looking at a later proven guy from the college ranks say a jeff Janis, brandon coleman, devin street, or even hoffman. instead of 4 TE's now with heath and spaeth back healthy, add a tall specialty receiver that doesn't have to play the #2 spot. I could see us keeping 6. 2 big, 4 fast, 2 of them vets,2 of them 2nd year, 2 of them rookies.:cool:
     
  7. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    30,216
    6,300
    Oct 22, 2011
    I wouldn't have a problem if they drafted cooks as the replacement for sanders. moore is there for stability if AB were to go down for some reason. I wouldn't have a problem with then drafting a second guy, not to start as cooks can do, but to go against what we have in moye and brown. brown is the longshot here anyway. he's more of a possession receiver. I'm looking at a later proven guy from the college ranks say a jeff Janis, brandon coleman, devin street, or even hoffman. instead of 4 TE's now with heath and spaeth back healthy, add a tall specialty receiver that doesn't have to play the #2 spot. I could see us keeping 6. 2 big, 4 fast, 2 of them vets,2 of them 2nd year, 2 of them rookies. I also don't see wheaton and moye having to come up with 10 TD's either. not while heath only had one last year. heath is healthy again and will take up a lot of that slack. cotch didn't do that when heath was healthy. :cool:
     
  8. thesteeldeal

    thesteeldeal Well-Known Member

    13,841
    1,898
    Oct 18, 2011
    I like Evans just not at 15. If he was head and shoulders above the rest then I would say grab him while you can. The thing is that this draft is deep in big/tall receivers so I don't see the need to get one so high. I have a hard time seeing anyone in this draft,outside of maybe Watkins unseat AB as our number 1. So basically we are looking for someone to take some of the pressure off of AB. I feel there are a number of talented WRs in this draft that can do that from the 2nd round on down. That is unless of course we trade back and someone then becomes more valuable.
     
  9. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,664
    10,211
    Oct 16, 2011
    Worked for Flacco! Chucked his way to a SB :lolol:
     
  10. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    No, let's just draft a bunch of speedy midgets and let them outrun everybody! :facepalm:
     
  11. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,664
    10,211
    Oct 16, 2011
    It's all good :thumbs_up:

    I just wanted to clarify I wasnt dumping on him, I don't know much about him.
     
  12. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    30,216
    6,300
    Oct 22, 2011
    didn't we win SB's with that type? how many have we won with a tall receiver?:cool:
     
  13. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    I think the point that needs to be made is that we can have a balance. It's nice to have differing skill sets among your receiver group and don't tell me that Moye and Brown have the same skill set that Mike Evans has. Evans will be a top 10 pick in all likelihood and Moye and Brown are both late round draft picks. If a tall receiver is overrated, why do you think Ben keeps clamoring for one. Quarterbacks love 'em!
     
  14. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    Stallworth was 6'2 which was pretty tall by the standards in those days. I do recall that we won a few when he was on the team.
     
  15. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    30,216
    6,300
    Oct 22, 2011
    I think that's what I'm more afraid of. ben liking that. ben likes to go deep. I don't want him to count on that as an offense.

    haley has ben coming around and believing in this thing now and we are finally starting to see what he can do with better protection, and he's deadly. I think cooks or Matthews are the more disciplined #2 capable types out there, but cooks brings a whole couple of different skill sets to the table. there's nothing wrong with getting a big receiver, but I'd hate to see the jump ball become a big part of bens game at this stage. we tried to make AB and sanders deep threats, but they just don't have that second gear like cooks has. add return skills and another guy to take that short game the distance at anytime like AB, and still capable of running good routes to move the chains and he brings a lot more to the offense then chuck and pray.

    the stink birds had other weapons too and a real good defense in the playoffs. they were lucky on many a chuck it up plays. seattle didn't win it that way last year, and boldins new team didn't win it at all.:shrug::cool:
     
  16. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    34,184
    8,395
    Nov 14, 2011
    It works for Calvin Johnson being a jump ball specialist, then why did the Steelers struggle in the redzone?
     
  17. steel1031

    steel1031 Well-Known Member

    3,825
    239
    Oct 16, 2011
    not sure but I think he was talking about recently
     
  18. HinesWardHOF

    HinesWardHOF Well-Known Member

    2,075
    0
    Oct 24, 2011
    hes also 5 ft 9 .... so i guess hes about right for the typical steelers WR...if we every get a 6ft receiver i got his nick name .. "BIG MAN" lol


    HINES
     
  19. steel1031

    steel1031 Well-Known Member

    3,825
    239
    Oct 16, 2011
    tall receivers don't mean success in red zone. I think Arizona, Atlanta both with big wrs were behind us
     
  20. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    30,216
    6,300
    Oct 22, 2011
    yep he was the offense back then. throw it up to the big guy. really jack?:cool:
     
  21. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011
    You asked a question, mac, and I answered it. And Stallworth WAS a big part of the offense then. Your implication is that I want to draft a big receiver and then let Ben play basketball ref all day and throw up jump balls. That's not the case! I would like to draft a big guy with TALENT and Evans fits the bill. And the implication by you and others that a big man makes no difference in the RZ is RIDICULOUS!
     
  22. thesteeldeal

    thesteeldeal Well-Known Member

    13,841
    1,898
    Oct 18, 2011
    Calvin is far from a jump ball specialist. It's his size and speed combo that transforms him into Megatron. There isn't a CJ in this draft,they don't come around too often. We struggle in the redzone because of a lack of execution plain and simple. Too many mistakes when there is no margin for error.
    Evans does fit the bill but so do a few other guys. Too much depth at WR in this draft and too many other holes to draft one so early. I don't think his size makes him a must have. I think there are other guys in that size range that are more well rounded and can be had later. I agree that a big WR should make a difference in the redzone but you still have to execute. If we are talking jump ball specialists I feel we already have that guy for the redzone in Moye,why not? Sometimes just having that threat on the outside is more dangerous than the threat itself. If we are looking for a better more complete WR regardless of height I feel we can do better than Evans and later.
     
  23. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    17,067
    5,043
    Nov 4, 2011
    For me the size thing is more about strength and catch radius than jump balls. Jump balls are nice, and it's great to have a guy who can physically beat his man in getting a lob, but routes like slants, digs and curls are all more effective when you have a guy who has the frame, catch radius and strength to wall the defender off, and the hand strength to grab contested passes and secure the football. Those routes are much higher percentage plays than fades and other "jump ball" types of plays. I want one or two guys who have the traits to be successful on those routes - which tend to be Ben's best routes when throwing in rhythm.

    Earlier in this thread I said that IF we think Cooks is another AB, we should get him. That was not a comment on Cooks, but just a remark on how good AB is. I have not watched Cooks enough to give him a fair grade yet, but since AB is the best sub 6' WR in the league (and is a rarity as one of the few sub 200 pounders who can effectively be the "X"), I'm going to say that it's not likely that Cooks is going to be the same type/caliber player. I'm still honed in solidly on Jordan Matthews as a guy who can do everything we need our #2 to do between the 20's, and become a #1 target in the red zone. My dark horse is Jarvis Landry. He may only be 5'11", but he has exceptionally strong hands to win contested plays.
     
  24. thesteeldeal

    thesteeldeal Well-Known Member

    13,841
    1,898
    Oct 18, 2011
    Agreed. I want a technical route runner. That's what makes AB so great. We need a guy with the best size/speed/quickness ratio there is. I agree with you on Matthews I think TTF turned a lot if us on to him. Maybe somehow he is there in the 2nd or in a trade back scenario. Really too much depth to go that early on a WR. We have had a proven track record with them in the later rounds. Not so much when picked early. I think we can continue the trend. If any of the top two CBs are there I think that's where we go. I feel defense is the pick at 15 one way or the other unless one of the top OL fall too far to pass up. I'm on the Donald bandwagon til the wheels fall off. I know...scheme but the more I read up and watch of him I just dream of him and Heyward goin' off. I saw a breakdown somewhere that said he isn't as scheme specific as he seems to be based on his measurables. He played in a 3-4 alignment at Pitt. two seasons ago and racked up 11 sacks........can you say "football" player.
     
  25. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    17,067
    5,043
    Nov 4, 2011
    On Matthews, if he'd had the good sense to run a 4.6 40 like Keenan Allen did last year, he'd probably be there for us at #46. Too bad for us.

    On Donald, I do agree that he'd be a nice sub package player. However, I don't see him having a place in our base defense at all. It's not just 4-3 vs. 3-4, it's one gap vs. 2 gap. Our base defense relies on our down linemen controlling 2 gaps. Now… he is really, really quick off the snap. If he could play OLB in our base defense, and shift inside in sub packages, then we're talking. He has the measureables to be a 3-4 OLB, but somehow I doubt we're going to find any film of him playing from a 2 point stance to see what he can do in that situation.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!