how many of newly signed FA's are 'starters'?

did he have everything to do with it? Why I why wouldn't you want to give your young and hopefully up and ccoming QB weapons to work with?

 

Because there is only one ball, and We just signed DJ ....just drafted Pickens, Heyward, Warren, Muth, Najee, and C. Austin. All within the last few years. Who You taking out so the new guys can play???. You can only have so many on the field at one time.
If You want to spend a high draft pick on someone that will only see the field about 10% of the game that's fine...., but I believe We should get true starters for the positions We don't have them at 1st. That's all.

 

What positions don't we have starters? Will a Sean davis, Terrell edmunds, artie burns or Devon bush be our new starter over what we have? Are you taking peterson, wallace, kazee, Neal off the field for an untested rookie? I could see a big TE out of Notre dame or Georgia getting on the field as a huge part of increasing the offensive output.

 

Well since PP...is way old for a CB, and Has been busted with PEDs....let's start there, and since Wallace didn't really shine last year....Well that's two reasons for Drafting a CB high.
Then You have Kazee who has never been a starter here yet, and Neal who is injured all the time.....So there is two reasons for that position. Need I go on???
Like I said ....I agree with other picks, but I'd like to use our High picks on positions We don't actually know We have a starter at 1st. That's all.

 

Actually, Kazee did start four games this past season. He replaced Edmunds against the Raiders, and three other times, they opened with the three-safety look.

Also, he has started 53 games in the NFL, including 15 of them as recently as 2021.

I am concerned that they don't really have a true box safety, but I'm not at all concerned about Kazee being good enough to start in the NFL. He has proven that.

Wallace and Peterson might actually be fine as starters in the short term, but yeah, they definitely need to use at least one premium pick on a cornerback.

 

My thoughts are this is a very deep corner and safety draft. TE is not nearly as deep, at least not in a duel threat type of player as the top two.

 

Not saying they shouldn't have signed him. Never said that.

 

I do know Kazee has started here, and did pretty well when He was completely healthy. I meant as a full-time starter. Many players have started at different positions many times.....that doesn't prove they can hold that position as a full-time starter......if I didn't make that more clear in My comments....My bad.

 

He has proven he can be a full-time starter in the NFL, unless you want to argue that starting 15 games for the Cowboys in 2021 doesn't count as being a full-time starter. He also started 15 games and led the league in interceptions in 2018.

 

Again....I'm talking Here....in our scheme.
Why do You try to turn everything into arguments???
We have not seen Him play a starter role Here. I'm never said He couldn't, and...I never said He could in our scheme.....I said I wasn't sure.

 

Why aren't you sure football mastermind? You should know these things? You're smarter the nfl organizations. These are the type of questions they must know the answer to.

 

You have made comments like this repeatedly

Why is it that if anyone knows more about football than you you ask why the aren’t in the NFL

Maybe they make a living elsewhere in a field they also know more than you

Like business for example

 

I don't turn everything into an argument, but I do find this idea that what players did elsewhere someone doesn't count a little silly.

 

I didn't say me lol as he doesn't know more than me. He thinks he knows more then a team.

 

He your boyfriend or soemthing?,

 

At a boy

If you can’t think of anything intelligent just start babbling

It’s a beautiful day in the neighborhood

 

Like you did when you said I had a boner about burrow right

 

I see you are working on your proper English

Good for you

 

That's the best you can do.

 

That wasn’t proper English.

 

Most definitely not my strong point

n’ at

 

Is that proper English