1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

How mad would you be with.......

Discussion in 'The Bill Nunn Draft Room' started by mac daddyo, Mar 26, 2019.

  1. steel1031

    steel1031 Well-Known Member

    3,816
    230
    Oct 16, 2011
    Great athlete. Just to me he disappeared alot. I am always nervous of the guys who seem to get their stats against weaker teams. I hope I am wrong and probably am. I didnt watch him every week or anything so maybe if he is the guy he is a stud.
     
  2. steel1031

    steel1031 Well-Known Member

    3,816
    230
    Oct 16, 2011
    I wouldn't be opposed to him at 20 but I dont like giving anything up to go get him. To much value at 20 and to much defensive value in the middle rds to give up those picks. Imo
     
  3. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    18,515
    1,031
    Oct 22, 2011
    We still have the second pick in the third round this year. That is all we would be giving up this year.:cool:
     
  4. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    10,078
    842
    Nov 14, 2011
    Kind of like some of those Bama defensive players that disappear in games :lolol:
     
  5. steel1031

    steel1031 Well-Known Member

    3,816
    230
    Oct 16, 2011
    He is alot like a Christian Miller. That's why Miller is a 3rd round pick
     
  6. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    10,078
    842
    Nov 14, 2011
    Nope he's better, that's why he will be a first round pick.
     
  7. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    7,965
    314
    Oct 26, 2011
    I like this one better.
     
  8. steel1031

    steel1031 Well-Known Member

    3,816
    230
    Oct 16, 2011
    I disagree but hey, it happens. Burns is no where near as good against the run
     
  9. turtle

    turtle

    6,569
    788
    Jan 14, 2015
    and another "How mad would you be with..." scenario

    What if they went offense in both 1 and 2? Say a TE with the 1st and a WR in the 2nd...

    Then with 3A they went Pratt, Long, Coney whoever is available and with 3B they went S with Hooker or Savage.
     
  10. thesteeldeal

    thesteeldeal Well-Known Member

    10,322
    1,148
    Oct 18, 2011
    I'd say they'd be stacked on offense....

    How mad would you be with

    1 TE- Hockenson or Fant
    2 ILB- Ben Burr Kirven or Pratt
    3a WR- Mecole Hardman
    3b S- Amani Hooker
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. turtle

    turtle

    6,569
    788
    Jan 14, 2015
    I'd be good with that...

    Hardman has some wheels, 3a would be great but I bet he goes in the 2nd. Someone will jump in the 2nd for that 4.33

    I could definitely see those position groupings though. TE, WR, ILB, S/CB. In some way for the first 4 picks.
     
  12. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    7,992
    875
    Nov 4, 2011
    Hmm... I still need to watch some film on Burr Kirven. He’s filled up the stat book with tackles, that’s for sure. I vacillate on Fant. He has to be used correctly to maximize his impact. That means more play action than we typically use, and more use of the TE in the slot or split wide than we usually use. I see the potential, but maybe not the fit.

    Hockenson; Pratt; Hardman; Hooker.... yeah that works.
     
  13. thesteeldeal

    thesteeldeal Well-Known Member

    10,322
    1,148
    Oct 18, 2011
    Don't burst my bubble pal....I've been on the Hardman wagon before he ran that " disappointing " 4.33:smiley1:
    I know he's rising fast but I'm hoping his lack of experience and production leads him to falling in our laps.
    He's barely scratched the surface and provides immediate major upgrades at KR and PR. He is more of a multidimensional offensive weapon at the moment but his upside at WR is enticing.
     
  14. turtle

    turtle

    6,569
    788
    Jan 14, 2015
    definitely enticing, him and Moncrief will do some damage on those deep throws
     
  15. thesteeldeal

    thesteeldeal Well-Known Member

    10,322
    1,148
    Oct 18, 2011
    Ladarius Green without the concussion?

    As far as PA? IMO it's paramount to equalize the run/pass ratio. So I would hopefully like to see a bit more of it. I could easily see Fant in the slot. He was used quite frequently in that manner.
     
  16. thesteeldeal

    thesteeldeal Well-Known Member

    10,322
    1,148
    Oct 18, 2011
    Bubble screens, jet sweeps and coming out of the backfield .....oh my!
     
  17. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    7,992
    875
    Nov 4, 2011
    Yeah, Fant can be very productive is used right. Hockenson I like a lot more though. Him and Vance would be a great matchup problem for defenses. They can both block in line, and they can both threaten the defense downfield. It makes it hard for the defense to match up vs. both the run and pass threats at the same time.

    Fant offers more downfield speed, but he’s a lesser blocker, especially in line.
     
  18. thesteeldeal

    thesteeldeal Well-Known Member

    10,322
    1,148
    Oct 18, 2011
    I don't think we could go wrong with either :thumbs_up:
     
  19. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    18,515
    1,031
    Oct 22, 2011
    How about,

    1. Love
    2. Savage
    3. Winovich
    3. Gary Johnson
    4. Gary Jennings :cool:
     
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2019
  20. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    10,078
    842
    Nov 14, 2011
    How about no :lolol:
     
    • Hilarious Hilarious x 1

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!