Hahahahahajahahaha!

Vega$ probably has a betting line on her making it to the game on time or not.

 

Agreed. Which is why when they typically have success against the Steelers is when they run the ball. Still blows my mind they ran the ball 6 times with their backs.

 

I would say Terry is the most successful. Ben probably was more talented. Well never know though because if the generation gap. Terry played on much better teams than what Ben had.

 

Lamar is and has always been a 1 read guy. If his primary read isn’t there he runs. If you take away his running lanes and his primary read he struggles.

 

Shouldn’t bother you. Be tougher.

 

I for one can't wait to see her outfit.

 

Terry’s superior performance in Super Bowls is what gives him the edge in my mind.

 

There is a new and funny "Pittsburgh Dad" video where he is calling a Ravens fan after their loss on an old-fashioned telephone, rubbing it in.

 

You haven’t seen a Kelce Jersey?

 

Gee. Thanks for the fatherly advice. I’ll run out and buy a Kelce jersey, her new CD and hit the gym.

 

That was enough to make me take a nap

 

shake it off pops

 

You know what really grinds my gears...the endless attention Jack Nicholson gets at Lakers games.

 

he does, but he has an amazing winning record when he starts. and he passed / threw much better this year, grew as a passer. i know most here hate on him, have at it.

we can split hairs all day long.

They are better than us week in and week out, we just match up well vs. them. he has been the league MVP twice,

when was the last time our QB has been one?

 

Dyan Cannon

 

I do understand why there is a debate:

Bradshaw did not lead his team to a Super Bowl until his 5th season. Bradshaw didn't even establish himself as the "franchise QB" until the 1974 season, Noll opened camp with a full QB competition and named Gilliam the starter. Bradshaw only got the job back in week 7 due to Gilliam's poor performance. Bradshaw really only had 1 really good performance in a Super Bowl.

Bradshaw Super Bowls

9/14 96 1TD 0INT (5 33 0TD)

15/24 204 2TD 3INT (5 22 0TD)

17/30 318 4TD 1INT (2 -5 0TD)

14/21 309 2TD 3INT (3 9 0TD)

Ben Super Bowls

9/21 123 0TD 2INT (7 25 1TD)

21/30 256 1TD 1INT (3 2 0TD)

25/40 263 2TD 2INT (4 31 0TD)

Ben lead his team to a Super Bowl in year 2 and while his numbers in that Super Bowl were poor, his Playoff numbers in 2005 were as follows

WC - 14/19 208 3TD 0INT
DIV - 14/24 197 2TD 1INT
CONF - 21/29 275 2TD 0INT

So he went 49/72 680YDS 7TD 1INT in the playoffs leading up to that Super Bowl - in year 2 he carried that team through the playoffs.

From a pure talent perspective Ben is better than Terry and it's really not close. If I had to build a franchise around Terry or Ben I'm taking Ben.

 

I TOTALLY disagree in the strongest terms that Terry only had 1 good Super Bowl performance. Not to be argumentative, but did you watch any of those Super Bowls? The first one(SB IX) he was more or less a game manager and the Steel Curtain defense did its thing. But in Super Bowl X, XIII and XIV, Terry Bradshaw was absolutely money when he had to be. In each of those games, there were inflection points where it was either do or die, win or lose, and Terry came up HUGE every…single…time! He didn’t do it by dinking and dunking down the field, he did it by throwing 40 and 50 yard missiles to Swann and Stallworth at the most critical times in each of those games.

His stat lines may not have always wowed you, but it was a different game back then and he delivered when he had to. He was named MVP of two of those Super Bowls (XIII and XIV) and could have been named MVP of Super Bowl X.

To say he only played well in one of those games is absolutely incorrect. Ben was great but his performance in Super Bowls overall left much to be desired. If you want to start your franchise with him, I understand that. But if you gave me one quarterback to win one Super Bowl, I’m taking Terry Bradshaw and don’t have to think twice.

 

I watched them all. Also, I didn’t say 1 good Super Bowl, I said 1 really good Super Bowl. There is a difference.

 

He had 3 really good Super Bowls and played reasonably well in the other given that he was essentially just asked not to lose the game and let the D and Franco win it. In the other three, he was the primary reason the Steelers won those games. Not to discount the rest of the team’s performance, but the bright lights and big stage were not too much for Terry and he delivered the goods.

 

Well that worked

 

Collin Cowturd was talking about you yesterday.

 

What is that idiot saying?

 

I actually think it's way worse to lose the championship game than the Superbowl. Especially if you're the home team. The Superbowl isn't as much of a "real game" to me because of how few real fans are there. I've been to 2 of them, and they have a way less exciting feel than being at a regular playoff game or maybe even a late season regular season game to get in the playoffs. The Superbowl is all about the week before and the parties. The game is almost anti-climatic.