I'm asking you the question. I'm not supplying the answer and I did not ever suggest that you were saying that Smith-Schuster is incapable of improving. I'm asking you to supply the answer because when you do so, you will be supporting my point. It's a rhetorical tactic and there is absolutely nothing dishonest about it. You and I both know he is not just capable of improving, but likely to do so. I'm not spinning your position. I'm asking a fair question and waiting on you to answer it honestly. On some level, you have to realize that both questions I asked would force you to supply answers that support my argument. I get that you don't like that, but it's not dishonest. My post was accurate and fair. Your response is not. You have repeatedly accused me of dishonesty when It wasn't true.