1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Did Blount and Belichick have a deal in place?

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Blast Furnace, Jan 28, 2015.

  1. contract

    contract Well-Known Member

    2,185
    16
    Jan 11, 2014
  2. contract

    contract Well-Known Member

    2,185
    16
    Jan 11, 2014
    Blount signed here because we offered more money. It was pretty obvious right from the start that he regretted his decision to leave the Patriots.
     
  3. Da Stellars

    Da Stellars Well-Known Member

    8,361
    1,104
    Oct 22, 2011
    What made it weird was NE lost their RB to injury for the year right? Wasn't it less than a month prior to the Blount incident?

    I think they lost Ridley and also Amendola was a little banged up too IIRC????
     
  4. AFan

    AFan Well-Known Member

    3,736
    808
    Oct 24, 2011
    After the Steelers released him, Blount had to to clear waivers. Nearly every team had to pass on him before the Pats could claim him.

    This presupposes that it was 'obviious' that the Steelers would release an RB who quit on his team, which they didn't do that with Mendenhall.

    and lastly, if LaGarette Blount is the virulent cancer that I'm told he is, why wouldn't Steeler Nation applaud his infection of the Patriots?

    I'm sure the tinfoil hat crowd will explain how all this logically holds together.
     
  5. contract

    contract Well-Known Member

    2,185
    16
    Jan 11, 2014
    Comparing Blount to Mendenhall is ridiculous. Mendy was a Tomlin 1st rd pick. Blount was a guy with a history who was signed as a #2 RB.

    And if another team claimed him, why would he care? He still might have gotten more playing time than here playing behind Bell.
     
  6. AFan

    AFan Well-Known Member

    3,736
    808
    Oct 24, 2011
    The point being made by the conspiricists is that Blount and Darth Hoodie had a handshake deal for his return to the Evil Empire after learning all the secrets of the high powered Todd Haley offense. If that is the case, he'd absolutely care if he got claimed by some other team before he could fulfill his evil destiny.
     
  7. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,658
    10,208
    Oct 16, 2011
    Is that really necessary?

    I'm not upset NE got him at all. NE being cheating dirt bags is what I don't like. Even know that wouldn't technically be cheating, its still more underhanded stuff that they are becoming known for.

    No one said it would be a guarantee that he'd get cut for walking out, just that NE may have said, you know if you ever get cut, you have a place waiting for you, wink wink, nudge nudge. If you follow the reports, it wasn't one incident, he'd been rubbing people the wrong way for most of the season.

    We're not talking about UFO's here, we're talking about a lying cheating team that has proven in the past they are sneaky.
     
  8. contract

    contract Well-Known Member

    2,185
    16
    Jan 11, 2014
    That's some conspiracists. Some of us just think he wanted to go back, and Belichick wanted him back, so Blount forced his way off the team.

    If Blount just wanted to get Belichick some info ... they have this thing called email now.
     
  9. biggbunch68

    biggbunch68

    13,844
    2,349
    Apr 26, 2012
    How many teams out there , do you think would have picked him up, knowing his past and the fact that he just walked out on his team, ( hint, the anser is 1 );)
     
  10. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    Blount isn't nearly talented enough for Belichek to give one damn about him while he's on someone else's roster. Of all the players in the league, Belichek picked Blount to tamper with? This may as well be UFO's, it's ridiculous. You're stretching just because it's NE.

    Blount probably did want to go back. Randy Moss also wanted to go back and said how great of a team NE was and how great Belichek was. He did so when he was on the Vikings and he promptly got himself cut because of his public display of affection towards NE. NE, however; didn't resign him.
     
  11. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    There's far less talented players out there with character concerns and they are on rosters. Blount would have been signed by someone else if NE hadn't taken him. He wouldn't have gotten much money or a starting gig, but he would have been picked up
     
  12. AFan

    AFan Well-Known Member

    3,736
    808
    Oct 24, 2011
    Why? He's a bum, a bad person, a locker room cancer. Good riddance. and the only fit for him is a SB team?

    if the Browns had picked him off waivers the howls of laughter would still be echoing. Typical desperate Clowns.
    But he goes back to NE, and suddenly he's valuable. Nefarious means were employed to get him.

    Does this line of thought not strike some of you as delusional?
     
  13. biggbunch68

    biggbunch68

    13,844
    2,349
    Apr 26, 2012
    Then why didnt they? he cleared waivers, they had there chance to claim him
     
  14. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,658
    10,208
    Oct 16, 2011
    Ridiculous and delusional because you guys don't agree? :lolol:

    You guys are awful trusting of a dirty organization.
     
  15. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,658
    10,208
    Oct 16, 2011
    This. If Blount didn't have a job lined up with NE than he got lucky because no one was going to touch a guy with a troubled past that just got cut for walking out on a game. Give me a break.
     
  16. biggbunch68

    biggbunch68

    13,844
    2,349
    Apr 26, 2012
    THATS WHAT I JUST SAID MORE OR LESS!!
     
  17. Ray D

    Ray D Staff Member Mod Team

    11,074
    2,304
    Oct 18, 2011
    It certainly smells fishy. New England jettisoned him last year. Don't let the door hit ya.

    Then he starts flirting with them during the season. Gets cut. They sign him immediately. It's not too hard to see why some are questioning it. Especially given New England's reputation.

    But...

    I think a more simple explanation fits. Blount is a grade A ahole. Got himself cut either deliberately or just as a result of being said jagoff. Bellicheck snatched him up because why wouldn't he? Blount knows his system. He can play right away. And most importantly: the Steelers suddenly look good, and we can milk him for info just in case.

    It's nothing Bill hasn't done before. Even during the season. Signed a player we just released knowing he's playing us soon. (Then release him as soon as the game is over)
     
  18. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    This has nothing to do with trust. Blount isn't particularly talented. He doesn't block well, doesn't catch well and has apparently struggled to understand play books in the past. I highly doubt Belichek wasted 2 seconds of his time worrying about a mediocre player that was on another teams roster. Just because he signed Blount doesn't mean Blount is anything special. Every NE RB looks good, it's been that way for a long time now. They signed Blount because he was available and they were short at the RB position. Ridley was injured and White hasn't panned out at all.
     
  19. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,658
    10,208
    Oct 16, 2011
    Once again, he had Jonas sitting there but he signed Blount and made him the starter. If Blount is that void of talent, why not just go back to Jonas, save yourself some money. And you guys are reading too much into our statements. No one is saying that they stayed up late, plotting and scheming, Blount himself said he kept in contact with players from NE, at any time one of them could passed a message on from BB. You are talking about a coach that will break rules for the smallest of advantages but this he is above?

    It's fishy, you dont have to agree but it is.
     
  20. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    Whoa, I never said Belichek is above tampering. I really don't know if he is or not. I'm just saying, this is a very far fetched scenario you're coming up with. Like Afan said, if any other team in the NFL signed him, many on here would be laughing at them for signing our trash, but because it's NE, it's some big conspiracy.

    Perhaps Blount told NE players he wanted to come back, but why would Belichek waste 2 seconds telling him he'd welcome him back considering he was on another teams roster? If we didn't give him 0 carries, he doesn't flip out and he never gets cut.
     
  21. SteelerJJ

    SteelerJJ Well-Known Member

    8,423
    498
    Oct 16, 2011
    Blounts production for the Pats in 2014-15:


    Week 12 --- 78 yards 2 TD's
    Week 13 --- 58 yards 0 TD's
    Week 14 --- 66 yards 0 TD's
    Week 15 --- 17 yards 1 TD
    Week 16 --- 62 yards 0 TD's
    Week 17 --- 1 yard 0 TD's (didn't play starters much)


    COLTS --- 148 yards 3TD's


    If he is not playing against Indi he is quite average.
     
  22. 86WardsWay

    86WardsWay Well-Known Member

    17,918
    5,260
    Dec 27, 2012
    Gee a Punk Thug and a Cheating Liar.

    Sounds like a perfect match.

    I was actually very excited when the brought Blount into the organization. So much for that thrill.
     
  23. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    Yeah but the team that he done well against had been victimized by that Pats line for literally like 5 games in a row with a backs by committee approach. Indy's front and Seattle's front are two vastly different things. I don't look for Blount to have a good game really. I personally think Seattle has the edge because I believe d wins titles. However, any time the Pats have this "us against the world" mentality they seem to play better. So who knows? It's tough for me because I like both qbs that are playing. I think Wilson is a better man but Tom is a better qb. I also like Seattle's hard hitting defense. I just think it is gonna be a good game basically. Still expect Seattle to win though just because of defense. Do you subscribe to the d wins championships theory out of curiosity?
     
  24. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    44,658
    10,208
    Oct 16, 2011
    It's really not and I'm not the only one that thinks it was fishy. Blount couldn't even answer the questions convincingly, wouldnt even take an expert to tell he was uncomfortable answering those questions.

    If another team signed him why would we suspect anything? But no team did and no team would have, what Blount did is highly frowned upon, add on top of that his troubled past, he'd be unemployed now if not for NE.

    And Blounts leaving the field was the last straw, not the only straw.
     
  25. Lizard72

    Lizard72

    21,872
    1,846
    Oct 23, 2011
    Bell strictly running stats.

    Week 12 --- 204 yards 1 TD's
    Week 13 --- 95 yards 1 TD's
    Week 14 --- 185 yards 2 TD's
    Week 15 --- 47 yards 2 TD's
    Week 16 --- 63 yards 1 TD
    Week 17 --- 20 yards 0 TD's

    Now if you factor in all purpose yards then you have a point, but that's not Blount's game.

    I don't think people are saying he's an all-pro running-back. What they are saying is that he fits a certain mold that teams may have a use for. Also, there was one team out there who could use his particular skill-set after seeing what they had for most of the season....
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!