Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by FosterMorris, Jan 9, 2022.
Way to go TJ!
I wonder if the NFL will look at that and change the recording of that play.
This is for posterity, they should want to get this right.
Dumb luck though for TJ, beat his man right away, easy sack if that wasn’t a low snap.
Damn right. That was a strip sack. No other interpretation possible. Looks like Strahan apologists wanted it this way. The NFL records keeper and Strahan are both living a lie. Too bad for TJ and his legitimate record.
They are going to have to take a long look at because if it stand then it should negate the personal foul call on Heyward the robbed Watt and Heyward of a sack. So on the fumble he is ruled he is a runner no sack, on the penalty Huntley keeps it runs and lower his head to slam it into Cam's shoulder forcing Heyward to look like a helmet to helmet hit and a penalty.
While we are at it why the Ravens didn't get an unnecessary roughing on their last sack of Ben I'll never know. Three guys on him, whistle blows and Raven's player drives Ben into the ground bur no call.
The Steelers have apparently asked the Elias Sports Bureau to review the play on which Watt forced Huntley's fumble, arguing that it should be a sack.
That would mean they would have to take the record from media darling Michael Strahan. Don't expect that record to change anytime soon.
Funny I also read that it will cost millions to Casinos and online Betting books if Watt breaks the record.
So, Bad news is the NFL who is in partnership with 3 betting sites will lose money if Watt is awarded the extra sack.
The National Football League today announced its first-ever U.S. sportsbook partnerships as Caesars Entertainment, DraftKings and FanDuel have reached agreements to become Official Sports Betting Partners of the NFL.
AKA it will cost the NFL and its partners millions of dollars if TJ Watt is awarded that extra sack.
Steelers asked the league to look at the sack. They expect an answer on Wednesday.
Well I guess I know what their answer will be then I guess.
whaaaaa...you want them to take a record from a bi sexual black man and give it to a white man ? you racist biggots !!!
Strahan is bi????
Never heard that one. Maybe the master knows something he's not telling?! Not that there's anything wrong with it.....
he aint admitted to it, but he sure did champion gay marriage like he had a dog in the fight.
I didn't know that, but I haven't really kept up with Him since He left football.
his ex wife during their divorce battle said he was light in the loafers along with being abusive and neglecting the kids. this was before he decided to be a rainbow warrior for the gays.
Yeah I never heard any of this.
Could be a reason for that. Probably all bs.
Yeah I don't know. Like I said. I never have heard anything about this, but 2 be honest I really haven't payed Him any attention since He stopped playing.
Hahahahhahahahahha, I always knew he was a bi product of certain consequences.
it could be...or it could be true. i'm just sayin the talk was out there.
I have read she was a whack job. Probably BS. Almost all ex women usually say two things to dig at their ex. Either they say he had a small dong or he couldn't function as a man. Same Ole same Ole.
Or rumors like the last sentence states
I was also talking about the accusations about being abusive towards his kids.
She got arrested for abuse of her kids I believe. Sounds like projection at its finest.