1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

Ben no longer an elite QB ?

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by Real steel, Jan 4, 2015.

  1. bigbenhotness

    bigbenhotness Well-Known Member

    21,634
    3,384
    Nov 1, 2014
    A healthy Bell, some Tackles than can actually outpower a defender and open running lanes, a decent secondary and we can make a SB run.

    Oh and a darn backup RB that can keep leveons legs fresh.

    We need to build around leveon now, he is the future imo.
     
  2. freakfontana

    freakfontana

    5,445
    23
    Oct 19, 2011
    too bad the invested money in gilbert and c.allen ..
     
  3. Rush2seven

    Rush2seven Well-Known Member

    13,743
    2,071
    Oct 17, 2011
    ouch, but true, not so sure about Pennington.
     
  4. PWP

    PWP Well-Known Member

    5,928
    464
    Oct 26, 2011
    -Stafford a 85.7 QB rating a Team can win games with that .

    Bens QB rating is better than these guys , but he also had some years that were worse than the entire list . His QB rating average is a 93. 9 not bad , but with no playoff wins in 4 seasons is he worth 100 Million ? If we could fix the entire Team by not signing Ben and draft a 85. 0 or so type QB of the future we could still win as many games if not more and long term might create a dominate Team again. Just food for thought .
     
  5. PWP

    PWP Well-Known Member

    5,928
    464
    Oct 26, 2011
    1 simple Question. What if we pay Ben the 100 million and we never win another playoff game with him will the signing still be worth it ? I know my answer and the recent information is leading towards he can't .

    All keep saying well if you think 8-8 is bad wait until Ben is gone . Well what difference does the # of wins really count if you don't reach the goal ? One could argue 8-8 is actually worse than 4-12 for a few seasons . At least you get to take a stab at some higher talent in the draft and you have the money to get the players that you need in FA .
     
  6. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,324
    9,646
    Oct 16, 2011
    You're not making it to the SB without a top flight QB, just look at the QB's in the last 10 years who won it. Theres no Trent Dilfers on that list. Its really that simple.

    The cap will be going up, people are making too much of that, the Rats signing Flacco hasn't stopped them from being a contender.
     
  7. PWP

    PWP Well-Known Member

    5,928
    464
    Oct 26, 2011
    However there is a kid named Russell Wilson and he has a shot at another one . The new Rookie caps have made it easier to build a young Team you can try like 4 or 5 different guys for the price of 1 six years ago .

    The bottom line is a Team needs some money to get real FA'S to fill your Team we don't even have true starters at 5 or 6 spots , that's just crazy.
     
  8. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,324
    9,646
    Oct 16, 2011
    Russel Wilson isn't much better than Trent Dilfer?

    Whether they have the cap space or not, the Steelers will never be big spenders in FA's, they have a successful model for building championship teams and the offensive side of the ball is already at that level, just have to finish working on the defense.
     
  9. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    Of the worst qbs that have won it since Dilfer I'd say it would be Brad Johnson, Eli Manning, and then Joe Flacco. Without those guys though the winners have all been really good quarterbacks like Brady, Brees, peyton, Ben, and Rodgers. I think Wilson is a good qb as well. Peyton has lost more Super Bowls than he has won. Ben and Brady have won more Super Bowls than they have lost. Rodgers and Brees have only managed to go to one.
     
  10. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    Russell Wilson is lightyears better than Trent Dilfer. He is also better than Romo, Flacco, and Newton and those guys are all still in the playoffs.
     
  11. thorn058

    thorn058 Well-Known Member

    16,488
    4,333
    Oct 19, 2011
    I agree to a certain extent Blast. I mean when the Ravens gave Flacco that huge payday it was what two years ago? The way they structure deals it is never in the first few years were you feel the crunch it is in the middle to last where money gets tight, just like with Ben's deal. It didn't hurt the first few years but you start adding up big contracts on top of it and it does hurt what you can do. One thing I will give the Ravens credit for and there are a lot of teams in the same boat is that they don't overpay middle of the road talent or become attached to players. It seems like they have replacements scouted a few years in advance and when you have an Ogden with declining skills you already have Oher waiting, Oher gets a few years and probowls on him and you have the next guy waiting. In order to keep using the tried and true formula of building through the draft the Steeelers are going to have it hit dead on target more so in the new age of the salary cap than they have in the past.
     
  12. contract

    contract Well-Known Member

    2,185
    16
    Jan 11, 2014
    You realize that Stafford was a #1 overall pick, right? Unless something goes horribly wrong, we will never be in position to draft that type of prospect ... and he's a good step down from Ben ... and he earns more.
     
  13. contract

    contract Well-Known Member

    2,185
    16
    Jan 11, 2014
    Wilson is NOT better than Romo or Flacco ... Newton is debatable.
     
  14. contract

    contract Well-Known Member

    2,185
    16
    Jan 11, 2014
    Wilson and Kaepernick walked into jobs with stacked teams. We don't have a stacked team, so a young above average QB wouldn't fare as well here. And Wilson will soon sign a huge new contract ... then what? Trade him?

    And you don't seem to consider all the teams with cheap QBs who suck anyway.
     
  15. PWP

    PWP Well-Known Member

    5,928
    464
    Oct 26, 2011
    I am not saying I would trade Ben . I am saying it is smart to consider it . As you stated we have a Team full of holes , my question is how do we fill those holes without money ?

    I am suggesting that maybe the days of bargain basement FA shopping should be over . So it is not crazy to think about the future and what may give us more bites at the apple to rebuild this Team .

    If we go with Ben all our eggs are firmly in that basket , so we need to make sure that is the best overall move for now and long term .

    Not comparing Ben to Wallace but contract wise and cap wise imagine the state of this Team had we signed Wallace . If Ben doesn't win it all then the decision to sign him will look even worse .

    Do you think Ben can carry this Team ? When you sign him that is really the only question you have to answer . His contract will keep us from getting help at other positions and those are just the cold hard facts .It aint pretty . It is what it is ....
     
  16. PWP

    PWP Well-Known Member

    5,928
    464
    Oct 26, 2011
    The model is all but broke . With the shorter Rookie contacts there will be better FA'S hitting the market each season, we will have to learn to play that market or fade into oblivion.

    You say finish working on the Defense . Let's look we need a FS a SS 2 starting CB'S and 2 OLB'S . So even if we extend Ben by the time we get that fixed he will be on his last leg . Ben has took to many big hits in his career his style has cut his career short. 3 or 4 more seasons for Ben at a high level that's my prediction. What if it is only 1 or 2 ?
     
  17. contract

    contract Well-Known Member

    2,185
    16
    Jan 11, 2014
    That's not the only question you have to answer. Again, even mid-tier QBs get franchise QB money, so unless you are prepared to commit to a continual cycle of replacing your starting QB every 4 or 5 years with a younger, cheaper model ... you are going to have to either pay someone. You can't outrun rising QB salaries for long.

    And for the record, I think it would be wise to let Ben play out his current contract and then evaluate whether or not to re-sign him, franchise him, or let him walk.
     
  18. blountforcetrauma

    blountforcetrauma Well-Known Member

    26,597
    1,251
    Oct 23, 2011
    Wilson is a much more accomplished qb than Romo. He is a more complete player than both of those guys I think.
     
  19. PWP

    PWP Well-Known Member

    5,928
    464
    Oct 26, 2011
    That is fair enough. But if you create cap space you can be in play for FA QB'S that hit the market and you would be making a decision on whether to pay the 25 or 26 year old QB as compared to the 32 year old one .

    If a Team really wanted Ben they would have to pay up , I am not saying to just consider giving him away . I would want fair market value to even have the discussion. A starting CB of high caliber and a 1st. round pick would get me pretty excited though .

    To speculate if that happened could Grad lead us as a game manager ? Could we use 1 of our 2 first round picks on a great #2 punch for Bell ? What if we get another CB and a ball hawk at FS and then get Bell a bu in round #2 .
     
  20. Blast Furnace

    Blast Furnace Staff Member Mod Team

    43,324
    9,646
    Oct 16, 2011
    Not remotely. The model seems to have done a good job building the offense. The defense isn't as far off as you think either, just like when I was was beating the drum that the offense wasn't that far off, I've always maintained that the offense was a step ahead of the defense and thats how it played out. Defense will round into shape next year.

    As for Ben, he'll get a 6 year deal likely and he will fulfill most if not all of that and at a high level, I think he just came off his best statistical season. He gets beat up much less and was sacked far less than you predicted this year. He gets rid of the ball quicker and checks down a lot more, he doesn't wait for the big play to develop as much as he used to which is when he used to take those big hits.
     
  21. PWP

    PWP Well-Known Member

    5,928
    464
    Oct 26, 2011
    You are correct Ben did play a lot smarter this year and I am glad for his sake. But most of the teams if not all that are left have some true FA signings. I don't think you can get by with no impact FA'S . I know we build though the draft but we are not hitting like we used to , a back up plan is not a bad approach that's all I am saying . We went into a Football game last week without one and we see how that worked.
     
  22. PWP

    PWP Well-Known Member

    5,928
    464
    Oct 26, 2011
    Oh and to the defense rounding into shape unless we draft CB,FS,CB, and SS and they all hit and start this D will get picked apart again .

    Lots of great Rookie WR'S going into year #2 and another crop of good WR'S coming we are way behind the curve as Teams will be adding more weapons and we can't cover the ones they already have , we will need a lot of work to compete for a championship Flacco torched us with a couple of good WR'S imagine the horror show against Denver or GB teams of that stature.
     
  23. Steel_in_DC

    Steel_in_DC Well-Known Member

    764
    14
    Jan 27, 2012
    Wilson doesn't get the credit he deserves much like Ben didn't in his early years because when you think Seattle you think about their defense. But he does deserve credit because the guy is a playmaker. The guy really impresses me with the way he seems to have a sixth sense on the appropriate times to run vs. pass - and when he runs it is always in a smart way, the guy doesn't take hits. I think Wilson is going to surprise some people and in 3-4 more years we will be putting him in with the upper echelon of QBs.
     
  24. PWP

    PWP Well-Known Member

    5,928
    464
    Oct 26, 2011
    I don't really underestimate him I think he is a good young QB being asked to manage the game and make smart timely plays . He passed for like 3000 yards or so and Ben was close to 5 k . Exactly my point you don't need a gun slinger 5 k QB to win big games .A solid Team and a smart QB is greater than a Great QB with no Team around them ...
     
  25. steelersrule6

    steelersrule6 Well-Known Member

    32,198
    7,866
    Nov 14, 2011
    :this!:
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!