1. Hi Guest, Registrations are now open. See you on the inside.
    Dismiss Notice

AFC North power shift

Discussion in 'Steelers Talk' started by SteelCity_NB, Apr 29, 2012.

  1. SteelCity_NB

    SteelCity_NB Staff Member Mod Team

    5,418
    684
    Oct 23, 2011
    I think that a recent trend over the past couple of years cemeted itself yesterday - Watch out for the Bengals.

    The Pittsburgh Steelers had another consistent strong draft, and IMO, is still the class of the AFC North. While we are getting older, Colbert is supplying this team with unbelievable talent. We will remain strong for years to come.

    The Baltimore Ravens, for all their hype, has not drafted all that well over the past few years. Just look at the list of players they have drafted in the top half of the draft over the past couple of years:

    2008:
    Joe Flacco (Not even a Top 15 QB)
    Ray Rice (Homerun here)
    Taveres Gooden (Plays with 49ers)
    Tom Zbikowski (Plays with Colts)
    Oniel COusins (Plays with Browns)

    2009:
    Michael Oher (Average OT at best)
    Paul Kruger (1 start in 3 years)
    Ladarius Webb (Started to show ability last year)

    2010:
    Sergio Kindle (Can't stay healthy)
    Terrence Cody (Good NT)
    Ed Dickson (mediocre TE)

    2011 is a little too early to pick on. Newsome is hailed as one of the better drafting GMs in the league, yet he has stumbled over the past few years, and I think an aging Ravens team will eventually start showing signs of weakness. Now I will say that Courtney Upshaw fell into their lap and that will be a good pick. Osemele should be a pretty good Guard, but other than that, the Ravens has a below average draft.

    I can't say much about the Cleveland Browns other than they continue to shoot themselves in the foot. It doesn't matter who the GM is, they just don't seem to get it.

    The Bengals are a team on the rise IMO. They are young and continue to be fed good young talent through the draft. This was helped by last year's fleecing of the Oakland Raiders in the Carson Palmer trade.

    Over the past few years they have drafted great looking players in Andy Dalton, AJ Green, Jermaine Gresham, Carlos Dunlop, Rey Maualuga & Michael Johnson. I think this past weekend's draft really set the Bengals up for the future.

    1a. CB Dre Kirkpatrick
    1b. OG Kevin Zeitler
    2. DT Devon Still
    3a. WR Mohammed Sanu
    3b. DT Brandon Thompson
    4. TE Orson Charles
    5a. CB Shaun Prater
    5b. WR Marvin Jones
    5c. S George Iloka
    6. RB Dan Herron

    When I look at this list, I can't find a player I disliked going into the draft. I scratched my head on why they passed on a guy like Decastro. However, with t he 3rd round pick they picked up from the Pats, they picked up Brandon Thompson. Thompson had late 1st/early 2nd round grades on him. Thompson + Zeitler probably makes up for passing on Decastro. I think Sanu instantly becomes their #2 WR and I think we will have problems with him.

    If the Steelers had an 'A' draft, then I think you would have to say that the Bengals at a minimum, matched us. I think in 3 years time, it won't be the Ravens that challenge us for the AFC North crown year after year, but rather the Bengals.
     
  2. numbah58

    numbah58 Staff Member Mod Team

    1,856
    29
    Oct 16, 2011
    We'll crush 'em they suck..

    Seriously though, I think you're spot on. The Bengals have drafted very well recently.
     
  3. Thigpen82

    Thigpen82 Bitter optimist

    10,492
    1,515
    Oct 17, 2011
    I agree with you - the Bengals are a team to be very wary of this year. Dalton's learing curve was worringly impressive last year. That team just needs an identity. It also needs a new HC, but that's another topic.

    I tend to agree with you that the Ravens haven't been excellent drafters the last few years, but perhaps your assessment is a little unfair. Flacco, for example, may not be top tier, but he can certainly win. Cody and Webb were both good picks. Their young receiving corps were also surprisingly good against us (which is what we're really concerned with). You're right about Oher - I suppose coming into the league while there's a film out about how great you are does set the bar a little high though. I think where the Ravens fall down in the next few years is the LB and S positions.
     
  4. mdbates2

    mdbates2 Well-Known Member

    1,359
    1
    Nov 3, 2011
    Funny though, how year after year - the "rivals" might change, but the class of the AFCN remains the same. Next up - the Clowns will be on the rise and who will they be challenging for the division title year after year? You guessed it - the Steelers!

    Thanks Mr. Rooney - and Kevin Colbert for making it so!
     
  5. Thigpen82

    Thigpen82 Bitter optimist

    10,492
    1,515
    Oct 17, 2011
    On that note, I can't quite figure out why the Clowns haven't been on the rise of late. All that early picking should have assembled them a better squad by now. I'm not sure it's so much their drafting than how they try and develop players afterwards.
     
  6. mdbates2

    mdbates2 Well-Known Member

    1,359
    1
    Nov 3, 2011
    Three words

    Holmgren, Heckert, and Shurmur

    'Nuff said.
     
  7. Lizard72

    Lizard72

    21,812
    1,832
    Oct 23, 2011
    Yup, all that crap about him in GB and Seattle. He got lucky with QB's and RB's
     
  8. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    29,635
    6,026
    Oct 22, 2011
    with weeden added to the mix, dalton and flacco, we will face 3 good qb's 6 times a year in our division. these guys are not bad qb's as much as we get on these teams. good qbacking makes up for alot of evils. the brownies will make some noise. we had a tough time with them anyway for some reason, now they will have an even better offense. no slouches in the afc north anymore. bring your big boy pads. :cool:
     
  9. mdbates2

    mdbates2 Well-Known Member

    1,359
    1
    Nov 3, 2011
    Actually, the Clowns failure starts at the top. Randy Lerner is NOT a football guy - at least not AMERICAN football.

    So, what does he do? He goes for name recognition. Someone tells him that Holmgren is a genius, and he's a well-recognized name. So, Lerner goes and gets him. Lerner doesn't know if Holmgren is a good fit or not for his American Football team. He just knows that the man can talk a good game and has had some success in other cities. So, Holmgren arrives with his own agenda and fat wallet and begins to hire his own cronies to run the organization. Hmmmmm oh look! It isn't working!!

    In the end, Lerner will realize in a few years that Holmgren didn't work out. He'll hire someone else and the whole thing will begin all over again. I guess that's what happens when you give rednecks a little money.
     
  10. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    I'm a fan and not a GM so I tend to take things year to year. Right now I'm more worried about the Ravens than I am the Bungles. True, they had a good draft and have a good defence and an improving offence, but they aren't there yet. The Ravens took the division title away from us last year and I want it back.

    Ravens fans look at our team and think we're old. Fact is, both teams have some young players and some old players and both teams traditionally draft well and develop well. They are transitioning from an older defence to a younger one the same as we are. They are going to continue to be a very strong team, same as every year.

    Cinci is drafting well right now, but can they keep it up long term like the Steelers and Ravens do every single year? We'll see. For now, the Ravens are my biggest concern.
     
  11. mdbates2

    mdbates2 Well-Known Member

    1,359
    1
    Nov 3, 2011
    O.K. I'll give you that Weeden has a lot of name recognition and he was an intriguing choice since he happened to be the oldest first rounder ever. I'm just not certain that it's for sure that he won't be a "slouch". The Clowns STILL didn't give him any weapons and he's certainly not used to the NFL game. He played in a no-huddle with a spread offense in college. It was even noted in the Cleveland media that he's never called a play in a huddle or had to break a huddle and read a changing defense.

    So - it's still too early to say that the AFC North has really good quarterbacks. Heck - what have Flacco and Dalton won? I realize that Dalton's only in his 2nd year, but Flacco certainly hasn't proven anything yet. Truth be told - there's only ONE quarterback in the AFC North who has won a ring - actually two - and we know what team HE plays for.

    :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw: :yeehaw:
     
  12. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    Don't be too quick to count the Browns out. If Weeden pans out, they could make some noise. They have a legit RB in Richardson, a good WR prospect in Little, a good defence that will just continue to get better. They need to add some more pieces, but they aren't as bad as they used to be. They have a lot of good, young players and I suspect they will get it together in the near future. As with all teams, they need a QB. Colt McCoy didn't pan out, but Weeden very well could. Weeden is a very good pocket passer, but his problem is he's got a bit of Blaine Gabbertism in that once the pocket gets a little crowded, he forgets how to play football.

    If they were to get a QB or if Weeden or McCoy eventually pan out, they will need to be taken seriously.
     
  13. mdbates2

    mdbates2 Well-Known Member

    1,359
    1
    Nov 3, 2011
    Are you a Cleveland resident like me drinking the Cleveland media koolaid??

    The IF in "IF Weeden pans out..." is the biggest IF in the draft. The "prospect" in Little is just that - a prospect - and Richardson hasn't had to run through the Raven and Steelers defenses twice a year yet either.
     
  14. shaner82

    shaner82 Well-Known Member

    11,348
    878
    Oct 16, 2011
    Nope, I don't even live in the US. Of course the Browns aren't there yet, I'm not saying they are, but there's no denying they have added a lot of good pieces and that's where building a good team starts. Eventually those good pieces either form a good football team or they don't, but without good pieces there's no building a good football team. The Browns are doing some good things. Even if Weeden doesn't pan out, which wouldn't surprise me, they still have some really good pieces on that team and with a good QB could make some serious noise in the division. They already have a good defence, they just need to build up the offence. Little is a good prospect and Richardson is a phenomenal RB.

    The Browns aren't anywhere near the Steelers or Ravens, but I won't completely overlook them anymore. They're quietly building a team over there and with a few more pieces, they could be a contender in this division in a couple years.

    The thing with them is the same with the Bungles, can they do what we've been doing for a very long time, and that's remain competitive every single year. I know we will have the odd down year where we miss the playoffs, but most years we are a Super Bowl contender.
     
  15. Thigpen82

    Thigpen82 Bitter optimist

    10,492
    1,515
    Oct 17, 2011
    Funnily enough, this sounds familiar to what's happened at Aston Villa. The results have been roughly the same, as well.
     
  16. mac daddyo

    mac daddyo Well-Known Member

    29,635
    6,026
    Oct 22, 2011
    weeden being able to see over his linemen will help them. i think he's a better qb then mccoy is and don't forget they play us close and tough. now give them a little more offense and these games will get that much closer. they are still our biggest rivals and remember they have been first pickin the O-line for several years now. if they can keep weeden up and throwing, and richardson running we better bring it against them. weeden and dalton have been on the bigtime stage in college football and have done well, they are not wide eyed kids to this stage, they can play football in the bright lights. receivers will look alot better with a better QB at the helm for these teams. :cool:
     
  17. BFreeZ28

    BFreeZ28 Well-Known Member

    107
    0
    Oct 17, 2011
    Yes it all looks good on paper but its what happens on the field between the lines that matters and the Steelers always manage to get the job done.

    The thing with Cleveland is there always seems to be a significant injury to a Steeler player during a game that really means nothing to them.
     
  18. gpguy

    gpguy Well-Known Member

    3,481
    21
    Dec 19, 2011
    Exactly...a lot of us think the Bengals draft looks good now...but who knows...the players could turn out waaay below what they were hyped to be. But as of now...it LOOKS good, haha.
     
  19. mdbates2

    mdbates2 Well-Known Member

    1,359
    1
    Nov 3, 2011

    The good thing about it is that we don't play them until Nov. 25. They'll be good and beat up by then - and there will be plenty of film on Weeden and Richardson.
     
  20. JackAttack 5958

    JackAttack 5958 Well-Known Member

    13,091
    2,478
    Oct 18, 2011

    They've drafted okay but they're the Bungles. The culture will eventually overcome the talent.
     
  21. SteelCity_NB

    SteelCity_NB Staff Member Mod Team

    5,418
    684
    Oct 23, 2011
    Are people actually genuinely concerned about the Browns selecting Trent Richardson? I was fist pumping when I learned the Browns traded 3 picks away to select a RB. I am confident in our ability to stop the run. It was Cleveland selecting Justin Blackmon t hat had me worried. To tell you the truth, the Bengals selecting WR Mohamed Sanu concerns me more than Trent Richardson.

    I am all for a team trying to run against us to win, because 9 out of 10 times, I think we will win that game. Its the aerial attack that scares me.
     
  22. Wardismvp

    Wardismvp Well-Known Member

    15,577
    2,463
    Oct 26, 2011
    As I stated in another post awhile back, everybody talks about the Rams holding the
    Redskins hostage, well the Bengals made a better deal when they unloaded
    the piece of crap Carson Palmer. The Bengals with this draft, have cemented their rise
    to the top of the division, we can not call them a joke no more. The red head is a winner,
    just like Big Ben, its scares me that they have a possible talent like #7.
     
  23. Steel_Elvis

    Steel_Elvis Staff Member Mod Team

    16,690
    4,880
    Nov 4, 2011
    I too would have been more concerned if they had drafted Blackmon, but Richardson does concern me a bit. I see a complete 3 down back who can hurt a defense in many ways. Ray Rice has had some pretty damaging games against us, and I see Richardson being able to do everything that Rice does, and more. So, yes, a bit of concern there. I also agree with you on Sanu being a concern. It wouldn't surprise me if he has the best career of all the WRs in this draft.
     
  24. mdbates2

    mdbates2 Well-Known Member

    1,359
    1
    Nov 3, 2011
    You ARE kidding right? You're putting Dalton in the same category as Big Ben?

    You are right that the Bengals got an excellent deal from the Raiders - and they MAY have gotten better and MAY challenge - but they're an up and down team. Last I checked, 2011-2012 was a playoff year for them. They are due to be a big disappointment for their fans. Big Red will come back to earth, or something will happen that will derail their season.
     
  25. defva

    defva Well-Known Member

    6,086
    629
    Oct 19, 2011
    Cincy or the clowns organization arent very good.cincy has a better chance but I want to see the play of dalton this season. I thought colt mccoy was gonna be a monster but his second year proved to be the opposite.
     

Share This Page

Welcome to the ultimate resource for Steelers fans. Sign Up Here!