Possibly, which is where my point about wear and tear comes in.
Yup. That is why I found it laughable when someone claimed that Warren runs harder. I love the way Warren runs, but no, he doesn't run harder than...
Edmunds is a terrible comparison. He was never good, but they never had a quality option to challenge him. The evidence supports me very well....
I think Warren is more likely to hit plays over 30 yards, but how often does that happen? Harris is more durable, and he does a better job of...
I think Tomlin got the best out of many players and this idea that he isn't even a good coach is just pure nonsense. That said, even good coaches...
Jimmy Johnson played favorites, too. Was he also a bad coach? I think things have gotten out of hand to the point that the inmates are running...
So he wasn't any good, yet they started him in every single game all four of his seasons with the team, consistently giving him more snaps and...
I think they kept the slightly lesser player because he was less likely to go into decline in the next year or two and he didn't run his mouth...
Arguing that Harris's injury made the Steelers right after previously insisting wear and tear on Harris wasn't a factor is moving the goalposts....
I know it looks that way, but it was a function of the schedule. The first half of the schedule was relatively easy. The last four games were brutal.
Playing Holcomb was about being stronger against the run. Of course, he had the most damaging missed tackle of the day, when the Pats went for it...
Way too many of those outside runs were blown up by safeties attacking the line of scrimmage because they had no fear of the receivers.
If that was the argument I made, that would be bad. It isn't and you should know that by now. My argument is that they clearly thought Harris was...
And people think I'm arrogant. Wow. :roflmao:
I thought you were kidding the first time you posted this nonsense, but you actually think your opinion affects how I watch the Steelers. Wow....
And yet he is still only averaging 3.1 yards per carry. Seems that being the lead back is different, which is what I and others have been trying...
This is more apples to apples. We are seeing Warren in the lead back role and facing the same challenges Harris did.
I agree with all of this. Warren is not the problem, but his low average per carry is showing that Harris wasn't the problem, either.
It's okay. Old folks do get confused.
It was on a big pass play. The Bengals did take a 10-0 lead in that game, but the Steelers dominated the second half.
