So then they should get rid of the whole team. None of them are making the team any better than they were before they got to Cleveland. Th
Browns were so much better before him?
I'd say Alex smith was above average. He did make pro bowls and have some good seasons. So did romo who did make an all pro team. Cousins is what...
Yeah I agree with that. That isn't even a Debate. And great of a team guy he is he has zero rings. Wr's don't win rings.
1000 yards with a bad qb is a good thing. A guy on the Steelers who was voted team mvp couldn't even get 500. And the browns are now bad because...
He cracked 1000 yards with bad qb play. He got those yards in spite of baker not because of baker.
It wasn't exactly a marquee game. Watch the ratings for the chiefs and ravens in 2 weeks.
I mean he wasn't a terrible qb.
Odell had 1000 yards last yr.
Obj had 1000 yards last yr :shrug:
Off the all tiem top 10 great receivers how many of them ave rings? Not even half. Wrs don't win rings. Judging them by the win loss column...
yeah you’re using 1 game to judge his entire career.
You must didn’t watch those pro bowl seasons he had in ny. Baker is terrible. That’s why he’s bad with the browns
possibly. Think San Fran and rams are options too. Maybe Houston tries too.
lol their cursed. I thought baker would be good and he’s terrible. Kyler Murray is the far better Oklahoma qb.
Easy win for Steelers. Broncos have too many injuries. Steelers-20 Broncos-10
My bet is NE or Seattle gets him.
Baker is a bust. Cleveland just maybe will never get it right.
Edmunds cant cover
28 smh