Sorry, but I’ve not posted that. My point was/is that the Steelers offered Bell a large contract with a relatively low percentage of it...
Dude, take a breath. I’m not a “Bell hater”. When I said I didn’t see the offer as a lowball, it’s because it was $70mm over 5 years ($14mm/year)....
This season, Ben’s home/away/overall ratings are weirdly similar.
No problem, T-Owl! “Not trying to be a jerk” was more than enough disclaimer. :thumbs_up:
I think we’re aggressively agreeing! Designating and accepting a tender are different things in the CBA. There’s at least an argument, however,...
I use NFL GamePass to watch plays, and the NFL Gamebook play-by-play to find when the relevant plays happened.
I’m pretty sure a team can’t put a guy on the roster if the NFL says he’s ineligible to play in the NFL. (And the player agreed to those terms.)
Agreed. I’m just wondering if the artificial nature of camp pumped up his confidence, and the regular season has him crashing back to earth.
I can’t really see it as a lowball offer. The guaranteed money was lower than the typical team would offer, true, but I think it was in line with...
In games, he seems to get caught spying the QB. In training camp, I wonder how much Burns had to worry about the run or other receivers, rather...
Even if he does report, all that stuff can still happen. The only difference is the amount of a franchise tag tender.
It isn’t new. I’ve posted it numerous times.
Prostate cancer a few years back. Wasn’t there a heart attack scare?
[IMG]
After hearing about servicing the missus, I’m wondering if that’s another newfangled expression. :rolleyes:
I posted the rules so people could read it, not as some inscrutable rebuttal. Fwiw, I said in the GameDay Thread that Edmunds chest-bumped...
His absolute deadline to sign the tender is a week from tomorrow: November 13th, 4pm Eastern.
What am I, chopped liver?!
Sorry, I was going by the reports that the Steelers would use the transition tag.
“[Fairwell], SpellCheck”
